Hillary Clinton is Done: part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
DavidJames said:
Just so we're clear. To the best of my knowledge someone reported they found certs were not purchased. Unless you can provide direct evidence that NO encryption was present, the best you can say no evidence has been found that the servers were encrypted. I know to the HDS folks among us that's a distinction w/o a difference. To those with technical knowledge, the difference is significant.

Just to remind. I manged a team of system admins who supported fortune 100 web sited, department stores, insurance companies, professional sports leagues, etc. Many of which, at some point, were using self signed certs as a temporary/interim encryption solution until signed ones were obtained.
Click to expand...


"Venafi, a Salt Lake City computer security firm, has conducted an analysis of clintonemail.com and determined that 'for the first three months of Secretary Clinton’s term, access to the server was not encrypted or authenticated with a digital certificate.'”

Reference:
Hillary Clinton’s email access was unencrypted, vulnerable to spies (March 11, 2015)
 
Last edited:
Slings and Arrows said:
"Venafi, a Salt Lake City computer security firm, has conducted an analysis of clintonemail.com and determined that 'for the first three months of Secretary Clinton’s term, access to the server was not encrypted or authenticated with a digital certificate.'”

Reference:
Hillary Clinton’s email access was unencrypted, vulnerable to spies (March 11, 2015)
Click to expand...

This has already been debunked in the clinton email thread.

Do you have evidence access to the server was not encrypted or authenticated ? IF you do , you would be the first one.
 
CNN is reporting that the FBI will seek no charges. AG is expected to follow that recommendation but won't decide today.
 
Travis said:
CNN is reporting that the FBI will seek no charges. AG is expected to follow that recommendation but won't decide today.
Click to expand...

Not quite accurate:

"The meeting signals the investigation is coming to an end, and sources tell CNN the expectation is Clinton will not face charges."

CNN is reporting that they've heard there will be no charges. They reported the same thing in May.
 
Fudbucker said:
Not quite accurate:

"The meeting signals the investigation is coming to an end, and sources tell CNN the expectation is Clinton will not face charges."

CNN is reporting that they've heard there will be no charges. They reported the same thing in May.
Click to expand...

And it looks like they were just as right then as they are now.

In contrast, where are the sources (non-Fox News) that are claiming there WILL be charges? Aside from all the brilliant legal minds in this thread, of course...

This is the part that is killing me (in laughter). Read this thread and we have those who act as if it is all obvious and clear that there was some serious corruption and legal problems. What are they going to say when the FBI says, "There's nothing there..."?

Oh, I know what they'll do. They hang on any little crumb they can and pretend it's a bakery. "The FBI didn't claim that rainbows come out of her butt. See? She is the most corrupt candidate ever!!!!!!"
 
pgwenthold said:
And it looks like they were just as right then as they are now.

In contrast, where are the sources (non-Fox News) that are claiming there WILL be charges? Aside from all the brilliant legal minds in this thread, of course...

This is the part that is killing me (in laughter). Read this thread and we have those who act as if it is all obvious and clear that there was some serious corruption and legal problems. What are they going to say when the FBI says, "There's nothing there..."?

Oh, I know what they'll do. They hang on any little crumb they can and pretend it's a bakery. "The FBI didn't claim that rainbows come out of her butt. See? She is the most corrupt candidate ever!!!!!!"
Click to expand...

Talk about killing me, you are gloating on the basis that Hillary might not get indicted for committing a felony while she ran the State Department a day after she had a three hour meeting with the FBI.

Hillary 2016' not a convicted felon yet!
 
Travis said:
CNN is reporting that the FBI will seek no charges. AG is expected to follow that recommendation but won't decide today.
Click to expand...


Unidentified sources have told CNN that no charges will be brought. My guess would be that Clinton propagandist David Brock is the source.

We have to wait for FBI Director James Comey to release his official recommendation. Until then, it's just the Clinton spin machine spreading disinformation.
 
If true: My bold prediction. Just like with Benghazi, HDS sufferers will not accept the results. Let the excuses begin (some have already surfaced)
 
pgwenthold said:
And it looks like they were just as right then as they are now.

In contrast, where are the sources (non-Fox News) that are claiming there WILL be charges? Aside from all the brilliant legal minds in this thread, of course...

This is the part that is killing me (in laughter). Read this thread and we have those who act as if it is all obvious and clear that there was some serious corruption and legal problems. What are they going to say when the FBI says, "There's nothing there..."?

Oh, I know what they'll do. They hang on any little crumb they can and pretend it's a bakery. "The FBI didn't claim that rainbows come out of her butt. See? She is the most corrupt candidate ever!!!!!!"
Click to expand...

The FBI might very well not recommend charges. That doesn't mean they can't issue a scathing report that politically damages Clinton. That's already happened once with the State Department IG's report, where we now know Clinton lied when she said her email practices were allowed.
 
16.5 said:
Talk about killing me, you are gloating on the basis that Hillary might not get indicted for committing a felony while she ran the State Department a day after she had a three hour meeting with the FBI.

Hillary 2016' not a convicted felon yet!
Click to expand...
What a strange world you live in. Even Petraeus wasn't convicted of a felony.

Honestly, you should get that HDS checked out by a professional.
 
DavidJames said:
If true: My bold prediction. Just like with Benghazi, HDS sufferers will not accept the results. Let the excuses begin (some have already surfaced)
Click to expand...

This reminds me so much of the Amanda Knox haters. Clinging to any thread to imprison a woman without reason for a burning hate inside them that they can't even rationalize.
 
Fudbucker said:
The FBI might very well not recommend charges. That doesn't mean they can't issue a scathing report that politically damages Clinton.
Click to expand...
Meanwhile how is that fraud trial going for Trump, you know the candidate involved in an actual trial rather than the fantasy one the Clinton haters have been indulging in for a year plus?
 
Garrison said:
Meanwhile how is that fraud trial going for Trump, you know the candidate involved in an actual trial rather than the fantasy one the Clinton haters have been indulging in for a year plus?
Click to expand...

Isn't it interesting that they want Hillary strung up for an IT mistake and want to make President a man who defrauded thousands of students?
 
acbytesla said:
Isn't it interesting that they want Hillary strung up for an IT mistake and want to make President a man who defrauded thousands of students?
Click to expand...

It's an amazing disconnect, they talk about 'crooked Hilary' while Trump is on trial. They call Clinton corrupt, while Trump has a history of shady business deals. They want the contents of Hilary's speeches, while Trump won't publish his tax returns. Double standards barely covers it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom