truethat
Banned
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2007
- Messages
- 13,389
Please explain why you find that to be so? I see more and more non-American actors in US TV shows and Hollywood movies for example. And seemingly about every 3rd film I watch has central London in it.
Exactly, they star in American shows and in HOLLYWOOD movies because England doesn't produce much very successfully on their own. The fact that you wrote this thinking it shows "English leads culturally" just demonstrates what I mean. For a country that's been around as long as England has you'd think they'd been leading in innovations in science, technology, medicine and culture. But they aren't.
This Brexit vote is an indication of how out of touch with reality they are. They really think they can go it alone?

Good luckAnother article pointing out the dire future for England.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thin...university-students-are-being-sold-a-lie.html
Teenagers are illiterate, those with higher level education are often majoring in junk degrees that are utterly useless and will not help them get a job. We have the same gripe here in the States but the difference is, tax payers aren't paying for some liberal media illiterate's degree. We pay for them ourselves.
So now that the country is turning how the heck is it going to work out when you have no real infrastructure and have basically alienated your allies by being arrogant xenophobic ijits!?
Only an Englishman would equivocate "culturally innovative" with "actors on television shows in Hollywood." Sigh.
When a sizeable chunk of today’s students leave, they discover they’ve been sold a pup. Graduate with a Bachelor’s in a soft subject from a low-rent uni and you jump a couple of places in the line for a call-centre job. You’d have been far better off spending the last three years working because by now, you’d probably be a manager in the call centre and you’d have a decent car, not £40,000 in student loans.
The taxpayer would have been better off, too, as tuition fees do not represent the whole cost of the course and people in work pay tax. It’s a dreadful lose-lose situation.
So, what are we going to do?
We should start by facing the facts. When people are worrying about our health service and worrying about not paying teachers enough, we cannot afford the luxury of sending 50% of our people to university. We also have a huge dearth of technically qualified people. People that industry (you know, that stuff we’re supposed to be encouraging) desperately needs.
We also have a higher percentage of people in tertiary education than both the OECD and EU average – and more than Germany and the US. Yet we are way down the league tables when it comes to numeracy and literacy amongst 16 -24 year olds; the OECD has England 22nd for literacy out of 24 countries.
The solution’s pretty obvious, isn’t it? Admit that our great educational leap forward hasn’t worked very well. Recognise we’re not delivering what the economy wants and that we’re deluding large numbers of university-goers - and decide that we’re going to stop.
Last edited: