Merged New telepathy test: which number did I write ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here's another post that speaks of something dripping with sarcasm, just to help you out understanding the expression "Drip drip drip ....." as applicable to sarcasm to mean "dripping with sarcasm".
Ashles was commenting on one of Michel's utterly worthless 'choose one of four numbers and I'll pick the answers I like' tests. So yes, the post is dripping with sarcasm, as anyone who didn't have a problem understanding reality would have immediately recognised.
Hilite by Daylightstar
 
Look Michel H, you currently present yourself as a mentally unhealthy individual who pretends to kiss girls in an online porn chat and fantasizes that this is doing science.
 
Of course, it indicates the sarcasm dripping from the statement you quoted.
I am referring here to the beginning of post #1950 of this long thread (just to make sure we're talking about the same thing here).

I don't want to be nasty, but I suspect you may have a little problem yourself understanding the true meaning of the word "sarcasm".

So here are a few sarcastic quotes:
"Some cause happiness wherever they go; others whenever they go." - Oscar Wilde
Read more at http://examples.yourdictionary.com/examples-of-sarcasm.html#aJfudgUbKbWSIez8.99
"I never forget a face, but in your case I'll be glad to make an exception." - Groucho Marx
Read more at http://examples.yourdictionary.com/examples-of-sarcasm.html#aJfudgUbKbWSIez8.99
"The trouble with her is that she lacks the power of conversation but not the power of speech." - George Bernard Shaw
Read more at http://examples.yourdictionary.com/examples-of-sarcasm.html#aJfudgUbKbWSIez8.99
"I didn't attend the funeral, but I sent a nice letter saying I approved of it." - Mark Twain
Read more at http://examples.yourdictionary.com/examples-of-sarcasm.html#aJfudgUbKbWSIez8.99
"What's on your mind, if you will allow the overstatement?" - Fred Allen
Read more at http://examples.yourdictionary.com/examples-of-sarcasm.html#aJfudgUbKbWSIez8.99
 
I am referring here to the beginning of post #1950 of this long thread (just to make sure we're talking about the same thing here).
...
In that post I was milking you with sarcasm for all it's worth :D

...
I don't want to be nasty, but I suspect you may have a little problem yourself understanding the true meaning of the word "sarcasm".
...
That is not being nasty at all, it's an incorrect statement :thumbsup: :D

E.T.A.: Let me add the link to that post #1950
 
Last edited:
Look Michel H, you currently present yourself as a mentally unhealthy individual who pretends to kiss girls in an online porn chat and fantasizes that this is doing science.
Yes, because I have read a good author:
I am hearing Michel H's thoughts. All of them.
...
So, from now on, I know what I am doing.

And I don't think I am presenting myself "as a mentally unhealthy individual", though, of course, constantly hearing nasty voices in one's head trying to convince you to end your life doesn't help, as far as mental balance is concerned.
 
Yes, because I have read a good author:

So, from now on, I know what I am doing.

And I don't think I am presenting myself "as a mentally unhealthy individual", though, of course, constantly hearing nasty voices in one's head trying to convince you to end your life doesn't help, as far as mental balance is concerned.

As I said, yes, you currently present yourself as a mentally unhealthy individual who pretends to kiss girls in an online porn chat and fantasizes that this is doing science.

Your claim of hearing voices does not remedy this situation, as you well know.
Perhaps you need to chat with Kathryne more often.
 
... I don't think I am presenting myself "as a mentally unhealthy individual", though, of course, constantly hearing nasty voices in one's head trying to convince you to end your life doesn't help, as far as mental balance is concerned.

Michel, did you intend that to be ironic, sarcastic, or both, or neither?

Perhaps compare it with "... I don't think I am "a physically unhealthy individual", though, of course, having a broken leg doesn't help, as far as keeping my balance is concerned".
 
Michel, did you intend that to be ironic, sarcastic, or both, or neither?

Perhaps compare it with "... I don't think I am "a physically unhealthy individual", though, of course, having a broken leg doesn't help, as far as keeping my balance is concerned".
Suppose you meet someone in the street who, for no reason, starts insulting you? Does this means you're "mentally unhealthy"? You will surely agree that the answer to this question is "No".

Now suppose someone starts insulting you using telepathy (which sometimes seems to appear like a kind of "telephone inside your head"). Does this means you're "mentally unhealthy"? No, because of just the same reason as in the example above: it is actually an aggression, and you're not responsible for it.
 
.......suppose someone starts insulting you using telepathy (which sometimes seems to appear like a kind of "telephone inside your head"). Does this means you're "mentally unhealthy"?......

Yes. Yes it does, Michel. Those voices are generated by your own brain, and there is no such thing as telepathy. Those voices generally mean you have mental health problems. Here, read this, and this, and this.
 
Yes. Yes it does, Michel. Those voices are generated by your own brain, and there is no such thing as telepathy. Those voices generally mean you have mental health problems. Here, read this, and this, and this.
People who hear voices in their head generally cannot supply evidence, testimonies indicating they are "telepathic", they "broadcast their thoughts (or mental processes)". But I can, see for example:
I am seeing a 4 very clearly. It's almost as though I had written it myself.
or
I am hearing Michel H's thoughts. All of them.
...
This means I am "special", even if this is very hard for you to admit, because it is neither pleasant nor comfortable to you, it shakes your worldview.
 
Last edited:
Yes, you are special, Michel, but not in the way that you think. You are in the 5% to 10% of the population who suffer from auditory hallucinations. Did you read any of the links in my previous post? My world view is unchanged. Your inability to understand that people are taking the piss out of you when they pretend to answer you seriously (even when they tell you directly that this is what they are doing) is something that you should discuss with your mental health practitioner.
 
People who hear voices in their head generally cannot supply evidence, testimonies indicating they are "telepathic", they "broadcast their thoughts (or mental processes)". But I can, see for example:

or

This means I am "special", even if this is very hard for you to admit, because it is neither pleasant nor comfortable to you, it shakes your worldview.

That was outright mockery. That you are unable to detect that is another common symptom.
 
Oh really. The joke's on you. There is no such number . It is a myth that was begun by the precursors of the sex industry in ancient Pompeii ...
LXIX doesn't seem to work as well, though.

(although I guess it does look a little like "licks")
 
... Did you read any of the links in my previous post? ...
Yes, of course, I read your links (I always do, for all links provided in this thread).

Here are a few links of a different kind, you might be interested in:
1) Here is a youtube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7dDMfSFfLY , which has been viewed more than two million times. At about four seconds in this video, you can hear Dr. Hennacy Powell (a psychiatrist) say: "I have seen evidence of telepathy in many people" (this video may also be found on Dr. Powell's personal website: see http://dianehennacypowell.com/consciousness/telepathy-project/ , it's at the top of this webpage). Some excerpts from Dr. Powell biography are:
Diane Powell, M.D. is an author, public speaker, researcher and practicing psychiatrist. She has spoken in venues that vary from international scientific conferences to news and talk shows ... She feels honored to have trained and worked with some of the best minds of the century, including several Nobel laureates. ... Biophysics and neuroscience captivated her attention as an undergraduate at Ohio State University. While taking classes, she worked in neurochemistry, biophysics and neurophysiology laboratories and published an academic article in neurochemistry. The lab work helped her realize she wanted to understand human consciousness, which meant going into medicine rather than graduate school.

While attending Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, she was taught by giants in their fields. Vernon Mountcastle and Sol Snyder taught her neuroscience and Alan Walker was her anatomy instructor. Hamilton Smith oversaw her microbiology lab. She co-published research on the genetics of Alzheimer’s Disease with Marshal Folstein and did neuroscience research in Joseph Coyle’s laboratory. After receiving her medical degree in 1983, he stayed at Johns Hopkins to complete postdoctoral training in medicine, neurology, and psychiatry.

In January 1987 she trained for six months at The Institute of Psychiatry in London, England with Sir Michael Rutter, who was knighted for his work on autism. In July 1987, Dr. Powell joined the faculty of Harvard Medical School where she taught neuropsychiatry, and gained experience in cross-cultural psychiatry and mind-body medicine. She moved in July 1989 to engage in molecular biology research at the University of California at San Diego during the Human Genome Project.
2) This is the wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mental_Radio of the book "Mental Radio" by Upton Sinclair (who won a Pulitzer prize). Some excerpts:
Mental Radio: Does it work, and how? (1930) was written by the American author Upton Sinclair and initially self-published. This book documents Sinclair's test of psychic abilities of Mary Craig Sinclair, his second wife, while she was in a state of profound depression with a heightened interest in the occult. She attempted to duplicate 290 pictures which were drawn by her brother. Sinclair claimed Mary successfully duplicated 65 of them, with 155 "partial successes" and 70 failures. ... The German edition included a preface written by Albert Einstein who admired the book and praised Sinclair's writing abilities.[2] The psychical researcher Walter Franklin Prince conducted an independent analysis of the results in 1932. He believed that telepathy had been demonstrated in Sinclair's data. Prince's analysis was published as "The Sinclair Experiments for Telepathy" in Part I of Bulletin XVI of the Boston Society for Psychical Research in April, 1932 and was included in the addendum for the book.
Here is Einstein's preface:
wXorhqH.png

This preface may be read online here: https://archive.org/stream/mentalradio005537mbp#page/n15/mode/2up (like the whole book).
I have a paper copy of this book (I bought it at Waterstone's "the English bookshop" in Brussels in 2001). This copy, published by Hampton Roads, has a "publisher's note", which says:
Mental Radio describes the imaginative and highly successful research in mind-to-mind communication carried out by ... Upton Sinclair ...and his psychic and very discerning wife Mary Craig.
 
...

Here is Einstein's preface:
[qimg]http://i.imgur.com/wXorhqH.png?1[/qimg]
This preface may be read online here: https://archive.org/stream/mentalradio005537mbp#page/n15/mode/2up (like the whole book).
I have a paper copy of this book (I bought it at Waterstone's "the English bookshop" in Brussels in 2001). This copy, published by Hampton Roads, has a "publisher's note", which says:

A somewhat sobering treatment of this preface can be found here:
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2005/jul/14/3
 
I liked this para:
Curiously enough, when Einstein was asked, years later, about his beliefs in the telepathic experiments of Dr JB Rhine, then studying parapsychology at Duke University, he stressed his scepticism in strictly scientific terms. All of Rhine's experiments had reported that psi-forces did not decline with distance, unlike the four known forces of nature - gravity, electromagnetism, the strong force and the weak force. "This suggests to me a very strong indication that a non-recognised source of systematic errors may have been involved," Einstein wrote

(Not re the book M is talking about, but psi in general.)


A non-recognised source of systematic errors. What a line!
 
I liked this para:
Curiously enough, when Einstein was asked, years later, about his beliefs in the telepathic experiments of Dr JB Rhine, then studying parapsychology at Duke University, he stressed his scepticism in strictly scientific terms. All of Rhine's experiments had reported that psi-forces did not decline with distance, unlike the four known forces of nature - gravity, electromagnetism, the strong force and the weak force. "This suggests to me a very strong indication that a non-recognised source of systematic errors may have been involved," Einstein wrote

(Not re the book M is talking about, but psi in general.)


A non-recognised source of systematic errors. What a line!

Excactly :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom