If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong. Part II

FalseFlag said:
Let's make this easy - easy enough for a skeptic to understand.

Suppose I have no cookies. I ask my mommy for two cookies. My mommy gives me one cookie. I asked for two, but I got one. Did I lose anything? No. I simply did not receive as much as I wanted.

Now, suppose I have two cookies. I drop one, and the dog eats it. Now I have one cookie. I had two cookies, but now I have one. I lost a cookie.

Do you see the difference? Of course you do; it's simple enough for any skeptic to understand. Now, will you admit that you understand this? No. Why? Because you can't. Doesn't it suck to be someone else's bitch?
Click to expand...

So you can show he profited from 9/11. Go for it. I will hand you your ass on a plate showing you are wrong. Go for it. :)

ETA: Your example is so disjointed I can't even think of a way to reply.........
 
Last edited:
Captain_Swoop said:
Didn't he make out like a Bandit?
Click to expand...

No! He continued to pay rent in the millions of dollars on buildings that did not exist after 9/11, and remember, there was a 99-year least he signed before the 9/11 attack. He needed billions to rebuild and lost a court battle with the airlines.
 
skyeagle409 said:
No! He continued to pay rent in the millions of dollars on buildings that did not exist after 9/11, and remember, there was a 99-year least he signed before the 9/11 attack. He needed billions to rebuild and lost a court battle with the airlines.
Click to expand...

'Made out like a Bandit' was the favourite phrase of one of our long time Truthers.
 
DGM said:
So you can show he profited from 9/11. Go for it. I will hand you your ass on a plate showing you are wrong. Go for it. :)
Click to expand...
You are implying Silverstein lost money. Please post your proof.

ETA: Your example is so disjointed perfect I can't even think of a way to reply.........
Click to expand...

FTFY
 
FalseFlag said:
You are implying Silverstein lost money. Please post your proof.



FTFY
Click to expand...

You claim he profited. I'm not taking your shift of proof. He would have been much better off if 9/11 never happened.

I will give you a hint. Something happened in 2006, a deal between SSP and the NYNJPA that proves he could not have made a profit from the insurance payouts and took away all future profit from the tower site (that he would have made it 9/11 never happened)

Do your homework and try to support your claim. I will feed your ass to you on a platter.
 
Last edited:
skyeagle409 said:
Do your homework and then, come back and tell us how much it cost to rebuild the World Trade Center?
Click to expand...
Why? I have already said I'm not going to do your busy work just so you can ignore facts.

You made the claim, you have the burden of proof.
 
DGM said:
You claim he profited.
Click to expand...
Where?

Go ahead and "hand my ass to me". Go ahead and post something I never said. I never said he profited. I only questioned the claim "he lost billions".
How can you consider yourself a credible skeptic if you make such blatant errors?
 
FalseFlag said:
Why? I have already said I'm not going to do your busy work just so you can ignore facts.

You made the claim, you have the burden of proof.
Click to expand...

Just to let you know, whenever a Truther fails to answer the question, it is an indication that he/she is on the ropes.
 
skyeagle409 said:
Just to let you know, whenever a Truther fails to answer the question, it is an indication that he/she is on the ropes.
Click to expand...

In addition to the appeal to lurkers.

Funny how those "lurkers" never turn up, isn't it?

What prevents these "lurkers" from signing up and making themselves known?

Are these "lurkers" real? Who knows. Yet FF appeals to these mythical "lurkers".

After all, it is not difficult to sign up. I have a vision of these mythical "lurkers" being confounded by the concept of a keyboard. That's tricksy magic.
 
DGM said:
You claim he profited..
Click to expand...

FalseFlag said:
Where?

Go ahead and "hand my ass to me". Go ahead and post something I never said. I never said he profited. I only questioned the claim "he lost billions".
How can you consider yourself a credible skeptic if you make such blatant errors?
Click to expand...
Sigh....
FalseFlag said:
One does not lose when one receives more than one had to begin with. Is that so hard to comprehend?
Click to expand...

FF, this is too easy. You'll have to try harder if you want to impress your mythical fan club.
 
FalseFlag said:
Where?

Here:
Click to expand...
FalseFlag said:
One does not lose when one receives more than one had to begin with. Is that so hard to comprehend?
Click to expand...
FalseFlag said:
Go ahead and "hand my ass to me". Go ahead and post something I never said. I never said he profited. I only questioned the claim "he lost billions".
How can you consider yourself a credible skeptic if you make such blatant errors?
Click to expand...

But you did say he profited. I'm not sure how many but the use of "billions" is not out of the park considering how much he could have made if he still had the towers.

FalseFlag said:
Oh, just so you know, your frustration is showing, and the lurkers are amused.
Click to expand...

Show proof the "lurkers are amused" by my post. Yet another claim you can't back-up. :rolleyes:

Axxman300 said:
He still had to replace the buildings, and since the insurance payment came in low he had to finance the difference himself.:thumbsup:
Click to expand...

FalseFlag said:
Proof?
Click to expand...

I gave you this one. Look up the 2006 deal with the PANYNJ. Your laziness is biting you in the ass.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom