what evidence you have for your claim?
The Bible, do you need more?
Surely this can't have been a serious question; you must have already known that the Bible doesn't count as evidence to most people here. So the "question" must have really been something else in disguise. Irony? But then irony for what purpose?
Anyway... it continued...
You are putting the bible though into this special category. A good skeptic will ask why yours should be in this special category.
Because I've personally seen lives change as has my own. The others not so much.
No. That has not happened by reading the Bible. I know what's in it, and there's just simply no chance that anybody's life was changed by reading
that. Zip. Zero. Zilch.
What can happen and could have happened would be someone's life getting changed by help from other people in their lives, who were Christians... maybe charitable help for an unlucky/downtrodden person, maybe help by example or by wise advice to cause a change in a self-defeated person's own behavior, maybe help through membership in a group for someone who had nobody to turn to before... but
human help, in any case. And that help might even have largely taken religious forms or been, to one extent or another, religion-inspired. But then, those helpful Christians would not have been doing it because of the Bible; most of modern Christianity, particularly the benevolent parts, is not at all based on the Bible and has little contact with it at all. It's a bit mysterious why they even still talk about that book at all when they clearly have almost nothing to do with, nor anything in common with, its contents, in any way at all.
BUT let's just skip all of that for the moment...
Even if we were talking about a book that could seriously change someone's life because (s)he read it... that still would not mean that it was a useful source of accurate facts about reality. A book can be inspiring or contain good advice or such and still make in accurate claims about the world.
