Hillary Clinton is Done: part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
16.5 said:
That is absurd for reasons I have already explained.

Brock admitted there were thousands of posts, certainly you can find one that was properly attributed.

Oh well, we know that there is no depth that Hillary and her Cabal won't sink to where they will not be cheered on by her supporters.
Click to expand...
No evidence yet for your claim that there are paid shills operating on this forum.
 
Slings and Arrows said:
I spend a lot of time over at Twitter, especially on the Bernie Sanders threads; which are the threads David Brock said he was spending over a million dollars to target.

So far, I have yet to see a single tweet that openly admits it came from David Brock's propaganda machine.

There are thousands of pro-Hillary tweets that sound just like they could have been written by David Brock, but none that give attribution.
Click to expand...
Anecdotal observations of an extreme partisan. How very convincing. :rolleyes:
 
Slings and Arrows said:
I spend a lot of time over at Twitter, especially on the Bernie Sanders threads; which are the threads David Brock said he was spending over a million dollars to target.
So far, I have yet to see a single tweet that openly admits it came from David Brock's propaganda machine.

There are thousands of pro-Hillary tweets that sound just like they could have been written by David Brock, but none that give attribution.
Click to expand...

Then it won't be hard to quote where he said that , and that list of threads, will it ?
 
varwoche said:
Anecdotal observations of an extreme partisan. How very convincing. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...


"Anecdotal?"

Not quite. I have been monitoring those threads for months. If thousands of tweets had attributions, I would have spotted them. So far, there hasn't been even one.

"Extreme partisan?"

Well, no more than anyone else around this neck of the woods.
 
Brock/Clinton PAC Ghost Write OpEd for Sanders foe

A few days before the Georgia primary, influential Atlanta Mayor Kasim Reed published a column on CNN.com praising Hillary Clinton and ripping her opponent, Bernie Sanders. Reed attacked Sanders as being out of step with Democrats on gun policy, and accused him of elevating a “one-issue platform” that ignores the plight of the “single mother riding two buses to her second job.”

But emails released from Reed’s office indicate that the column, which pilloried Sanders as out of touch with the poor, was primarily written by a corporate lobbyist, and was edited by Correct the Record, one of several pro-Clinton Super PACs.
Anne Torres, the mayor’s director of communications, told The Intercept this week that the column was not written by the mayor, but by Tharon Johnson, a former Reed adviser who now works as a lobbyist for UnitedHealth, Honda, and MGM Resorts, among other clients. The column’s revisions by staffers from Correct the Record are documented in the emails.
Click to expand...

https://theintercept.com/2016/05/06/hillary-super-pac-draft-oped/

As of this morning, the article still does not reflect the PAC's involvement.

No attribution. How Orwellian can you get?
 
Last edited:
In other news, Clinton is so done that she only needs 155-160 (depending on your source) of the 1,083 remaining delegates.

Add this to the failure of the FBI investigation to turn up anything yet, and Clinton is about to "done" herself into becoming the next POTUS.
 
Mader Levap said:
Except it is not. Something failed somewhere, long before Trump. He is result, not cause.
Click to expand...

The major issue with the US system currently is that one party has decided that it is unwilling to take part in the consensus process, but rather is playing a game of "If you don't give me everything I want, then you aren't compromising at all."

Trump is a result of a lot of issues, but that fact that he was able to get to the nomination is a reflection of the removal of safeguards against such populists over the past few decades because of a push to make things more democratic.

In fact it's having the opposite effect. Now small, but vocal, populist movements are having a greater effect on the system than the quieter majorities.
 
Argumemnon said:
So basically she needs to net a third of California and nothing else and she still wins?
Click to expand...

She just needs slightly under 15% of the remaining delegates. If she can pull all of the remaining Supers, that drops to just under 6% of the pledged ones.
 
PhantomWolf said:
She just needs slightly under 15% of the remaining delegates. If she can pull all of the remaining Supers, that drops to just under 6% of the pledged ones.
Click to expand...

She's 155 short of 2383. There are 153 as of yet undeclared superdelegates (715-562). If they want to tell Sanders it's time to shift gears, they could give her the win tomorrow as she'll surely get more than 3 of W Virginia's 37 delegates.

I suspect out of concern over appearances and because it might offend Sanders' supporters they won't, but they could.
 
16.5 said:
Gee why am i surprised that Hillary's supporters have ignored this bombshell proof?

:thumbsup::D:thumbsup:
Click to expand...

Good find. It still doesn't say they are failing to attribute on forums, but I'm fine calling it a solid inference. Facts are our friends.
 
16.5 said:
https://theintercept.com/2016/05/06/hillary-super-pac-draft-oped/

As of this morning, the article still does not reflect the PAC's involvement.

No attribution. How Orwellian can you get?
Click to expand...


Excerpt from the article:

"Correct the Record is the Super PAC founded by David Brock, a Republican-turned-Democratic strategist who controls a number of pro-Clinton campaign entities and websites.

"In April, Correct the Record caused a stir when it announced plans to spend $1 million to build a “digital task force” dedicated to “pushing out positive content to Hillary supporters online to counter negative attacks and false narratives.”

"Super PACs were intended to be independent entities, explicitly prohibited from coordinating directly with campaigns. Correct the Record, however, has tested the limits of campaign finance law and openly coordinates with the Clinton campaign."

-----

Wouldn't surprise me at all if Hillary Rodham Nixon selects mudslinger-for-hire David Brock as her VP running mate -- sleazy and sleazier.
 
Last edited:
Slings and Arrows said:
Excerpt from the article:

"Correct the Record is the Super PAC founded by David Brock, a Republican-turned-Democratic strategist who controls a number of pro-Clinton campaign entities and websites.

"In April, Correct the Record caused a stir when it announced plans to spend $1 million to build a “digital task force” dedicated to “pushing out positive content to Hillary supporters online to counter negative attacks and false narratives.”

"Super PACs were intended to be independent entities, explicitly prohibited from coordinating directly with campaigns. Correct the Record, however, has tested the limits of campaign finance law and openly coordinates with the Clinton campaign."

-----

Wouldn't surprise me at all if Hillary Rodham Nixon selects mudslinger-for-hire David Brock as her VP running mate -- sleazy and sleazier.
Click to expand...

Want a Sig.bet on that?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom