Hillary Clinton is Done: part 2

[Axiom_Blade]

That is no more evidence of paid shills than the people pathologically determined to attack Clinton for any and all matters, or those who defend Trump, etc.

You mean...no more evidence of paid shills, except the evidence that everybody accepts at this point?

Exit polling suggests peoples' problems with Clinton are:
1. Not that she's not progressive, but that she's not progressive enough. Clinton's pitch is realistic incremental change, not wholesale reform.
2. She's not honest and trustworthy
3. She's too close to Wall Street

That's funny, because those look like the same problems that people have with Donald Trump.

 

[PhantomWolf]

You mean...no more evidence of paid shills, except the evidence that everybody accepts at this point?



That's funny, because those look like the same problems that people have with Donald Trump.

Anyone that claims that Trumps ideas are "realistic incremental change" needs a padded room.

 

[Slings and Arrows]

Correct The Record

Correct The Record will invest more than $1 million... to push back against attackers on social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, and Instagram.

The task force will begin to push out information to Sanders supporters online, encouraging them to support Hillary Clinton.

The task force currently combats online political harassment, having already addressed more than 5,000 individuals who have personally attacked Secretary Clinton on Twitter.

http://correctrecord.org/barrier-breakers-2016-a-project-of-correct-the-record/

Paid shills tweeting Hillary's political propaganda. Just another day in the life of crooked Hillary Rodham Nixon.

 

[Fudbucker]

And once again, of course you can believe this to be the case, and you can say why you believe it to be the case, and you can argue your point. Belief is not evidence. "Why not" is your speculation. It is the contention that it is evidence that I am arguing about.

I thought you were implying it was crazy to even consider the idea.

 

[BobTheCoward]

Paid shills tweeting Hillary's political propaganda. Just another day in the life of crooked Hillary Rodham Nixon.

Point to one of these paid shill tweets.

 

[Slings and Arrows]

Point to one of these paid shill tweets.

"having already addressed more than 5,000 individuals who have personally attacked Secretary Clinton on Twitter."

Hillary's surrogate, David Brock, openly admits that more than 5,000 tweets have come from his paid shills.

 

[varwoche]

"having already addressed more than 5,000 individuals who have personally attacked Secretary Clinton on Twitter."

Hillary's surrogate, David Brock, openly admits that more than 5,000 tweets have come from his paid shills.

Do you actually not realize how transparent this evasion is? Topped off with an unattributed quote no less.

Try harder, or something.

 

[Slings and Arrows]

Do you actually not realize how transparent this evasion is? Topped off with an unattributed quote no less.

Try harder, or something.

It's not an unattributed quote; just scroll up to my last comment. It comes directly from David Brock's website:

http://correctrecord.org/barrier-breakers-2016-a-project-of-correct-the-record/

 

[dudalb]

This actually shows a fundamental lack of understanding of the political system that the US Founding Fathers put in place. They recognised that any system where a President could change it with wholesale reform would be inherently unstable, and worse, would be highly susceptible to tyranny.

As such they designed the US system with so many checks and balances that the only way to change things is via slow increments and a consensus between all of those involved.

Those that want wholesale reform should consider the dangers this creates for when a President who is the opposite of their position comes in. What would prevent them doing a equally large "wholesale reform" in the other direction? Such a thing creates chaos. The US System is designed to be stable and orderly.

Although is has had many bumpy places,the only time the US system of checks and balances totally broke down was in the 1850's over slavery,and The Civil War..the worst bloodbath in American History .

And it is even more dangerous when in order to make "reforms",you give one person or a small group complete and total power. The Enabling Law that allowed this in Weimar Germany was a main cause of it's demise.

 

[dudalb]

Hillary Clinton and her surrogates have taken a page straight out of Vladimir Putin's playbook: paid shills spreading propaganda throughout social media.

Donald Trump probably debated over whether to call her Crooked Hillary or Sleazy Hillary; but in this particular case, Hillary Rodham Nixon would be suitable (or should that be pant-suitable?).

Pssst, hey keep quiet about Putin, he and Trump are good buddies,from the way they praise each other.
And Russia Today, Putin main shill in the US,has been bending over backwards to praise Trump. Do try to keep up.
I am beginning to think that you really don't follow what Trump says or does much.

 

[Slings and Arrows]

Inside Russia's pro-Putin troll factory

An army of Internet trolls is using cyberspace to promote Russia and wage war against opposition groups and the West.

Based in St. Petersburg, the agency was staffed predominately by young people, many of whom were unable to find jobs elsewhere.

They were given targets such as President Obama, Europe or Ukraine, and ordered to celebrate two characters: Putin and his defense minister Sergey Shoygu.

Most of them do the work unconsciously and write what they're dictated.

The trolls were paid between 40,000 and 50,000 rubles (about $750) per month.

http://money.cnn.com/2015/09/03/news/russia-troll-factory-putin/

I stand by my earlier claim, crooked Hillary Rodham Nixon and her lackey David Brock have borrowed a page right out of Vladimir Putin's playbook.

 

[BobTheCoward]

"having already addressed more than 5,000 individuals who have personally attacked Secretary Clinton on Twitter."

Hillary's surrogate, David Brock, openly admits that more than 5,000 tweets have come from his paid shills.

It doesn't say how they were addressed. It could or could not be attributed. That is my point. You would have to produce the response to one of these 5,000 people to actually know if it falls under paid shilling.

 

[BobTheCoward]

I stand by my earlier claim, crooked Hillary Rodham Nixon and her lackey David Brock have borrowed a page right out of Vladimir Putin's playbook.

You linked to a story where a reporter actually got employment by the organization and reported what actual content was being directed? And then you come here and post assertions as facts based on one press release. Seems like you are taking a page out of the Russian playbook.

 

[The Big Dog]

It doesn't say how they were addressed. It could or could not be attributed. That is my point. You would have to produce the response to one of these 5,000 people to actually know if it falls under paid shilling.

That is absurd for reasons I have already explained.

Brock admitted there were thousands of posts, certainly you can find one that was properly attributed.

Oh well, we know that there is no depth that Hillary and her Cabal won't sink to where they will not be cheered on by her supporters.

 

[Belz...]

Let's just say that Hillary fanboys and Hillary haters are equally ideological and irrational.

 

[Belz...]

"Most of them do the work unconsciously"

What, they're in the Matrix or something?

 

[The Big Dog]

Let's just say that Hillary fanboys and Hillary haters are equally ideological and irrational.

Well, at least you have found a way to feel superior to both.

 

[Belz...]

Well, at least you have found a way to feel superior to both.

Well, inasmuch as I am not an ideologue or a fanatic, yes. I didn't mean to hurt your feelings.

 

[BobTheCoward]

That is absurd for reasons I have already explained.

Brock admitted there were thousands of posts, certainly you can find one that was properly attributed.

Oh well, we know that there is no depth that Hillary and her Cabal won't sink to where they will not be cheered on by her supporters.

I have not made a claim in either direction. You have, and it is your responsibility to provide evidence.

Also, I am not a supporter. I'm as deontological libertarian as they come.

 

[Slings and Arrows]

That is absurd for reasons I have already explained.

Brock admitted there were thousands of posts, certainly you can find one that was properly attributed.

Oh well, we know that there is no depth that Hillary and her Cabal won't sink to where they will not be cheered on by her supporters.

I spend a lot of time over at Twitter, especially on the Bernie Sanders threads; which are the threads David Brock said he was spending over a million dollars to target.

So far, I have yet to see a single tweet that openly admits it came from David Brock's propaganda machine.

There are thousands of pro-Hillary tweets that sound just like they could have been written by David Brock, but none that give attribution.