RE: clintonemails.com: Who is Eric Hoteham?

Status
Not open for further replies.
sunmaster14 said:
Really? How do you know it's false? I don't have proof, but I would bet a lot of money that it's true actually.
Click to expand...

Maybe some hiliting will help make it clear how I know:

The_Animus said:
From what I understand the latest info basically says that Clinton claimed 30k of her e-mail were personal and contained no classified info so she deleted them but now based on the DOJ's own submission, they did in fact have classified information on it.

So she lied, and deleted information she knew she wasn't supposed to.
Click to expand...
 
The_Animus said:
Tony are you actually paying attention to what is going on anymore? Or have you given up on that in favor of straight trolling?

From what I understand the latest info basically says that Clinton claimed 30k of her e-mail were personal and contained no classified info so she deleted them but now based on the DOJ's own submission, they did in fact have classified information on it.

So she lied, and deleted information she knew she wasn't supposed to.

Is that the kind of thing you support?
Click to expand...

You are conflating a couple things and drawing conclusions that not everyone has drawn.

Of the 30K emails she thought were not work related, I believe there was a difference of opinion on some of them but now I can't find where I read that, only that the server was with the FBI, they weren't scrubbed, merely deleted and the FBI was recovering them.

Of the 30K that were turned over, some were deemed classified. But that also is not unusual as people have different opinions and the same difference of opinions were made about Colin Powell's emails and he said it was ludicrous too.

You really should wait for the FBI's report before drawing your premature conclusions.
 
Fudbucker said:
I wasn't talking about the chance, I was making a point that if it happens, presumption of innocence is irrelevant. Clinton's campaign would come to a screeching halt. We've never had a general election where one of the candidates was indicted.
Click to expand...

Well I'm not sure that's true either but there is no benefit arguing the point.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
You are conflating a couple things and drawing conclusions that not everyone has drawn.

Of the 30K emails she thought were not work related, I believe there was a difference of opinion on some of them but now I can't find where I read that, only that the server was with the FBI, they weren't scrubbed, merely deleted and the FBI was recovering them.

Of the 30K that were turned over, some were deemed classified. But that also is not unusual as people have different opinions and the same difference of opinions were made about Colin Powell's emails and he said it was ludicrous too.

You really should wait for the FBI's report before drawing your premature conclusions.
Click to expand...

wrong. For some reason you keep confusing the emails that Hillary turned over in paper form to State and that were ordered released, with the 30.000 emails that Hillary did not turn over and that were deleted, but there are indications that the FBI may have been able to recover some of them.

I don't think i can make this any clearer
 
Tony Stark said:
Has Hillary confessed?

lol
Click to expand...

Moving the goalposts is a logical fallacy. It does nothing to make your hypocrisy go away. If you believe he confessed then it should have been all the easier to convict right?

Keep on trollin Tony
 
Last edited:
The_Animus said:
Moving the goalposts is a logical fallacy. It does nothing to make your hypocrisy go away.

Keep on trollin Tony
Click to expand...
Ignoring the huge difference between someone who has confessed and someone who hasn't is highly dishonest and really quite pathetic. But if that's how you want to roll, no skin off my back.
 
Tony Stark said:
Ignoring the huge difference between someone who has confessed and someone who hasn't is highly dishonest and really quite pathetic. But if that's how you want to roll, no skin off my back.
Click to expand...

So if he confessed, has he been charge or convicted yet? Why not Tony?
 
The_Animus said:
Powerful political types can sometimes do illegal things but not get charged or convicted? :jaw-dropp

Hmmm :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Sure, but it doesn't mean they did those things just because some people really, badly want them to be destroyed.

And anyone can get away with committing a crime.
 
Last edited:
Tony Stark said:
Sure, but it doesn't mean they did those things just because some people really, badly want them to be destroyed.

And anyone can get away with committing a crime.
Click to expand...

I got it Tony. You have one standard of evidence, being charged and found guilty, for those you like such as Clinton, but a different standard of evidence for those you don't such as Bush.

Tony Stark said:
Has Hillary been indicted yet? lol
Click to expand...

Tony Stark said:
So when do you think Hillary is going to be indicted. LOL.
Click to expand...

Tony Stark said:
Has she been indicted yet? LOL
Click to expand...

Tony Stark said:
So guilty until proven innocent? Even though she hasn't even been charged?
Click to expand...

Tony Stark said:
W is without any doubt whatsoever a war criminal.
Click to expand...

The_Animus said:
So if he confessed, has he been charge or convicted yet? Why not Tony?
Click to expand...

Tony Stark said:
Because he was the *********** President of the United States.
Click to expand...

;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom