Hillary Clinton is Done: part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Skeptic Ginger said:
Once again I cannot figure out your disconnect. :boggled:

I've seen two charts, this is one of them. Clinton is down there on the bottom with Carson and Trump lying the most.

All of the Democrats are more truthful than all of the Republicans except Jeb Bush. You lumped them altogether.

The other had a similar result.
Click to expand...

Why didn't you check the actual site I was talking about? If you didn't, why do you comment on what I said?

And all that to not actually disagree with me, which is odd. It's almost as if you want to disagree.
 
Argumemnon said:
Why didn't you check the actual site I was talking about? If you didn't, why do you comment on what I said?

And all that to not actually disagree with me, which is odd. It's almost as if you want to disagree.
Click to expand...

Why didn't you notice the rest of us were talking about the bar graphs? You could have asked.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
Well this is odd. Silver has updated his prediction but after adding in the CBS/YouGov poll that had Sanders up 2, instead of lowering Clinton's chance of winning, he upped it 1% to 52%.
Click to expand...
And now with one more poll (Emerson) showing Sanders up by 8%, Silver flipped his prediction to 69% chance of Sanders winning.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
Why didn't you notice the rest of us were talking about the bar graphs? You could have asked.
Click to expand...

Because I'M THE ONE WHO BROUGHT POLITIFACT UP, Ginger. ME. Geez, pay *********** attention. I brought it up as a counter-example, and you apparently decided that I wasn't talking about the very website I mentioned. You made the error of not reading my post, and now you want to blame me for that.
 
Argumemnon said:
Because I'M THE ONE WHO BROUGHT POLITIFACT UP, Ginger. ME. Geez, pay *********** attention. I brought it up as a counter-example, and you apparently decided that I wasn't talking about the very website I mentioned. You made the error of not reading my post, and now you want to blame me for that.
Click to expand...
Sorry to break it to you, but you were not the one that brought it up. This is part two of a very long thread on Clinton and the lie that she's dishonest has been refuted with the evidence including the bar graph citations more than once.

But I see now why you have such disconnects all the time, you have tunnel vision in this thread.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
Sorry to break it to you, but you were not the one that brought it up. This is part two of a very long thread on Clinton and the lie that she's dishonest has been refuted with the evidence including the bar graph citations more than once.

But I see now why you have such disconnects all the time, you have tunnel vision in this thread.
Click to expand...

:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
Sorry to break it to you, but you were not the one that brought it up. This is part two of a very long thread on Clinton and the lie that she's dishonest has been refuted with the evidence including the bar graph citations more than once.

But I see now why you have such disconnects all the time, you have tunnel vision in this thread.
Click to expand...

:rolleyes:

She openly lied yesterday, and not only did polifact say it was "half-true" they also had their claims totally wrong.

She is a pathological comprehensive congenital liar and has been so for 25 years.
 
Politifact isn't always accurate. It rated false Sanders statement that almost all the polls suggest he is a stronger candidate against the Republicans than Clinton.

I can't say I've seen every poll but I've seen several and Sanders always did the same or better than Clinton vs GOP.
 
The_Animus said:
Politifact isn't always accurate. It rated false Sanders statement that almost all the polls suggest he is a stronger candidate against the Republicans than Clinton.

I can't say I've seen every poll but I've seen several and Sanders always did the same or better than Clinton vs GOP.
Click to expand...

She claimed she "all" her emails were out there, despite releasing about half.

So they ruled it "half true."

Mind blown.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
Sorry to break it to you, but you were not the one that brought it up.
Click to expand...

Sur I did. Right here:

Argumemnon said:
Let's not call each other stupid just yet.

How about the politico page comparing the candidates? Based on that she doesn't seem more dishonest than any other politician.
Click to expand...

Again, pay attention.

This is part two of a very long thread on Clinton and the lie that she's dishonest has been refuted with the evidence including the bar graph citations more than once.

But I see now why you have such disconnects all the time, you have tunnel vision in this thread.
Click to expand...

Again, PAY ATTENTION: I was not saying she is dishonest, but LESS dishonest than a lot of people claim.

Do you even read posts before replying?
 
Argumemnon said:
Because I'M THE ONE WHO BROUGHT POLITIFACT UP, Ginger. ME. Geez, pay *********** attention. I brought it up as a counter-example, and you apparently decided that I wasn't talking about the very website I mentioned. You made the error of not reading my post, and now you want to blame me for that.
Click to expand...

And this is not to your credit. Politifact's cherry-picked and biased ratings have no probative value whatsoever. Hillary Clinton is dishonest because she has told whopper after whopper for 25 years, and she does it almost automatically and reflexively. Yes, maybe Donald Trump is worse by some metrics, but to tell you the truth, I think his lies are not nearly as damaging because he is so transparent, and he lies about completely unimportant stuff. His lies are more like farts. Yeah, they smell bad, and they're sort of rude, but they go away after a few minutes. A Hillary Clinton lie is more like making a doody in somebody's sock drawer and covering up the smell with air freshener.
 
sunmaster14 said:
And this is not to your credit.
Click to expand...

I never said it was. If Ginger just responded that it's not a reliable site and why, I would've been fine with it because, as I said before, I find it highly odd that this particular site paints her as relatively honest when everybody and their mother distrusts her.

My problem is that Ginger apparently didn't read my post and was arguing against a strawman.
 
Argumemnon said:
I never said it was. If Ginger just responded that it's not a reliable site and why, I would've been fine with it because, as I said before, I find it highly odd that this particular site paints her as relatively honest when everybody and their mother distrusts her.

My problem is that Ginger apparently didn't read my post and was arguing against a strawman.
Click to expand...

Your problem is that you were apparently unaware of a topic that had been discussed in the thread already. It's really as simple as that.
 
The_Animus said:
Politifact isn't always accurate. It rated false Sanders statement that almost all the polls suggest he is a stronger candidate against the Republicans than Clinton.

I can't say I've seen every poll but I've seen several and Sanders always did the same or better than Clinton vs GOP.
Click to expand...

You need a link because my guess is you are distorting what they specifically said was false.

Yes it's true Sanders has polled well against the GOP candidates so far. But contrary to yours and a couple other people's denial, those polls don't reflect what we all know is going to happen with a Sanders nomination, he'll be pummeled on raising taxes and wanting a welfare state.
 
16.5 said:
:rolleyes:

She openly lied yesterday, and not only did polifact say it was "half-true" they also had their claims totally wrong.

She is a pathological comprehensive congenital liar and has been so for 25 years.
Click to expand...

Then you should become a very happy man when she becomes the President on January 20, 2017.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom