Hillary Clinton is Done: part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Has this been posted yet?

Trump Helps Democrats As 9% Of Michigan GOP Will Vote For Clinton If Trump Wins
According to the new Monmouth University Poll, “If Trump emerges as the GOP nominee, 7-in-10 Michigan Republican primary voters (71%) say they would get behind him in a general election against Hillary Clinton. However, 9% would actually vote for Clinton.
Click to expand...

Reading the GOP media you would think differently:

Michigan Shows Trump Could Redraw Electoral Map vs. Clinton
But if Tuesday’s primary results in Michigan are any indication, Trump, who has been underestimated at every turn of this campaign, should be taken seriously. Between his comfortable victory fueled by blue-collar white voters, and Hillary Clinton’s defeat thanks to her vulnerabilities with that same group, it’s possible that a November matchup between the two front-runners could drastically redraw the electoral map.
Click to expand...

This is what I was looking at when I saw those contradictions:

CARL BIALIK on 538
There are a few possible explanations for the huge polling miss in the Michigan Democratic primary: For instance, if a significant number of Clinton supporters stayed home out of complacency or crossed over to the Republican primary to oppose Trump, that may have contributed to Sanders’s shocking win. We might get more explanations from pollsters soon — I’ve emailed several who showed Clinton ahead by 10 percentage points or more to ask why they think the polls were so far from the voting results.

Here’s another possible explanation: The most recent Michigan polls in our database stopped contacting voters Sunday, the night of the last debate, held in Flint, Michigan. Although many thought Clinton performed better than Sanders in the debate, perhaps voters felt differently. After many pollsters missed Ted Cruz’s Iowa win and suggested that Clinton would win Iowa easily — she won so narrowly that some call it a tie — several pollsters told us a lesson they learned: “Keep on contacting voters as late as possible.” But it’s up to poll sponsors to pay to contact voters until the final days of the race, and none did so in Michigan.
Click to expand...
 
Just watched last nights Late Show w/Stephen Colbert.
I get the feeling, over these last months, he doesn't like HRC!
His guest the Attorney General, was asked about HRC claiming nothing would come of her being investigated(which she most certainly is). Loretta Lynch didn't play that tune.
She did explain that many career law enforcement officials were involved, though.
That is one HUUUUUGE, vast right wing conspiracy!:rolleyes:
 
Cleon said:
I wonder if at Nixon's funeral anyone hailed his great courage and transparency during the Watergate scandal festival.
Click to expand...

You can bet he was hailed for all his foreign relations successes not mentioning a dozen horrid things he'd done. And no doubt Ronnie was praised for his fight against the commies without mentioning all the damage he's also done in that ignorant battle against the Red Scare.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
She was trying to be nice at a funeral, it was hardly an evil mistake. Stupid, yes, evil no.
Click to expand...

Stupid AND evil. If she didn't know better, she should have. And her non-apology was pathetic.

Either she did this with full knowledge of what she was saying, or she has a mental deficit from her concussion which needs to be addressed.
 
BenBurch said:
Either she did this with full knowledge of what she was saying, or she has a mental deficit from her concussion which needs to be addressed.
Click to expand...
Yes. It couldn't possibly be because she misremembered Nancy Reagan as being a nicer person than she was - at a funeral of all places!

Obviously she is senile and/or mentally deficient. ******* retard! :mad:

Stupid AND evil...
Click to expand...
I agree 100%.

Stupid - because she should have had a prepared speech and used a teleprompter.

Evil - because CLINTON.

There's only one way for Hillary to save herself now - she has to come out as a lesbian!
 
Clinton has more than 1.5 million votes than Sanders has at the moment. Some caucuses remain uncounted as they don't have total votes, just total delegates so Sanders has a few more votes not showing up here. Still Clinton has a large margin of actual votes.
 
http://www.commondreams.org/news/20...ence-shows-sanders-literally-right-behind-her

Mrs. Clinton accused Mr. Sanders of distorting her record and said the Vermont senator, who has made a single-payer health care system a signature part of his campaign, had not always been such an advocate on the issue.

She said she has "a little chuckle to myself" when she thinks about the current debates over health care. "I don’t know," Mrs. Clinton said. "Where was he when I was trying to get health care in ’93 and ’94?"

The answer: “Literally, standing right behind her,” a Sanders spokesman, Mike Casca, said on Twitter, posting a photo from a 1994 news conference that shows Mr. Sanders next to Mrs. Clinton when the then first lady spoke about the White House’s proposed health care overhaul.
Click to expand...

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/06/bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-119082

In February, Sanders requested a meeting with Hillary, “to bring in two Harvard Medical School physicians who have written on the Canadian system,” according to the records of the administration’s task force. Those physicians were Stephanie Woolhandler and David Himmelstein, leading advocates for single-payer health care.

They got their meeting at the White House that month, and the two doctors laid out the case for single-payer to the first lady. “She said, ‘You make a convincing case, but is there any force on the face of the earth that could counter the hundreds of millions of the dollars the insurance industry would spend fighting that?’” recalled Himmelstein. “And I said, “How about the president of the United States actually leading the American people?’ and she said, ‘Tell me something real.’ ”
Click to expand...
 
Sadly Animus, Clinton is right. And you forget that a lot of that money will go to the Congress, not the POTUS. It doesn't mean Clinton is on the take. It means she's taking a realistic position given the state of US politics today.

Sanders would not be able to overcome that just because it's what he wishes the country was like today.

I said this before and I'll say it again, Sanders himself says he can't accomplish his goals unless there is a voter uprising. His uprising isn't strong enough. You can ignore that, believe the movement is there, look out over a sea of Sanders supporters at a rally on a college campus, but at the end of the day, if the movement was indeed rising up, Sanders would not be losing the election at this stage.

It's not the DNC conspiracy to limit debates, it's not the news media's lack of coverage, it's not the money in politics (he has plenty), it's not the superPACs, there are several supporting Sanders from the Kochs that want to defeat Clinton to a union PAC or two.

It's that the movement isn't materializing.
 
Hillary Feels the Bern!

Hillary Clinton spent much of her Saturday speaking in St. Louis

Of course she couldn't help but take the opportunity kick sand at senator Sanders, Attempting to dismiss his concerns and dedication to Health Care.
She alleged, “I don’t know where he was when I was trying to get healthcare in ’93 and ’94.”

Really!?

picture.php

http://uproxx.com/news/clinton-sanders-right-behind-her-1990s/2/

not to mention:

picture.php

https://twitter.com/jeneps/status/708726520768901121/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc^tfw

Following on the heels of the Nancy Reagan revisionist history episode with regard to HIV, what is going on with HRC? is it just the strain of the campaign?
 
Trakar said:
Hillary Clinton spent much of her Saturday speaking in St. Louis

Of course she couldn't help but take the opportunity kick sand at senator Sanders, Attempting to dismiss his concerns and dedication to Health Care.
She alleged, “I don’t know where he was when I was trying to get healthcare in ’93 and ’94.”

Really!?

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=839&pictureid=10610[/qimg]
http://uproxx.com/news/clinton-sanders-right-behind-her-1990s/2/

not to mention:

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=839&pictureid=10611[/qimg]
https://twitter.com/jeneps/status/708726520768901121/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc^tfw

Following on the heels of the Nancy Reagan revisionist history episode with regard to HIV, what is going on with HRC? is it just the strain of the campaign?
Click to expand...

Maybe she's adopting Trump's campaign tactics, just say whatever B.S. pops into your head at a given moment and go with it.
 
Mike! said:
Maybe she's adopting Trump's campaign tactics, just say whatever B.S. pops into your head at a given moment and go with it.
Click to expand...

So perhaps she is going for the Trump support, because she doesn't think she'll win over much of the Sanders support?
 
Mike! said:
Maybe she's adopting Trump's campaign tactics, just say whatever B.S. pops into your head at a given moment and go with it.
Click to expand...

The truly scary thought is that this is really the quality of her memory. She apparently really believed that she had been under sniper fire in Kosovo, for example.

And then we see her forgetting the AIDS crisis of the 1980s and praising Nancy Reagan for her role in it when she was really an impediment to progress, and we see her forgetting that she actually praised Sanders for his help during her attempt to get health care reform.

And there are other things.

Like she said that ALL of her Grandparents immigrated to America, which was not true at all, being only true of ONE of them.

She claimed that she was critical of the Iraq war before Obama was, which wasn't at all true.

And I am sure there are other things she has misremembered.

If this is the state of her memory then that is troubling in the extreme.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom