Here is a a positive hypothesis.
[Nature/Natural Law] can create Algorithmic Cybernetic CODING and de-CODING schemes.
If you can't falsify this positive hypothesis, then you can't claim to know that it is not true.
Well this isn't a Null Hypothesis (lol) so it's not my job to falsify it, "YOU" have to VALIDATE IT....whereby Falsifying the Default Position: The NULL Hypothesis...
Nature/Natural Law
CAN NOT create Algorithmic Cybernetic CODING and de-CODING schemes.
My second hypothesis is that nature/natural law did so at least once in this universe. Life as seen currently on earth is defined by algorithmic cybernetic coding and decoding schemes.
Lets see
THE TEST...? Highlight The Independent and Dependent Variables for us...?
Life could have been created by a superior intellect on Europa while life emerged on earth by unguided processes. Or vica versa. Life could have been generated by unguided processes on earth but was created by a a Master designer on earth. Or quite possibly life could have been generated by unguided processes on both planets.
And Anna Nicole could have married for Love and had Pol Pot as her Florist.
life emerged on earth by unguided processes.
Really?? Well, SHOW...
1. Functional DNA/RNA/Proteins NEVER spontaneously form "naturally", outside already existing cells, from Sugars, Bases, Phosphates, and Aminos, respectively.
It's Physically and Chemically IMPOSSIBLE.
That's just the Hardware!
To refute, Please show a Functional 30 mer- RNA or Protein (most are 250 AA or larger) that formed spontaneously "Outside" a Cell/Living Organism, CITE SOURCE! The smallest "Functional" DNA (Genome) is a little over 100,000 Nucleotides... so that ain't happenin !
Conclusion from the Grand Poobah's of OOL Research...
"We conclude that the direct synthesis of the nucleosides or nucleotides from prebiotic precursors in reasonable yield and unaccompanied by larger amounts of related molecules could not be achieved by presently known chemical reactions."
Gerald F. Joyce, and Leslie E. Orgel, "Prospects for Understanding the Origin of the RNA World," p. 18 The RNA World, R.F. Gesteland and J.F. Atkins, eds. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1993.
Then the WOOLLY Mammoth in the Room...
2. How Did Stupid Atoms Write Their Own Software....? In other words, show how Ink/Paper/Glue Molecules can Author Technical Instruction Manuals/Blueprints...?
You have not provided evidence that cybernetic codes could not have been created by unguided processes given a very long time.
Well isn't it the Acme of foolishness to even attempt to provide evidence for the Absence of Something (Argument from Complete Ignorance)?? Your appeal here is Non-Sequitur, on Steroids.
In fact, you have not provided a formal definition of cybernetic processes.
It's "
INFORMATION"... informs or instructs; the basis of all
communication. It's neither Matter or Energy; it's Semiotic.
The shape of any fractal structure can be interpreted as a code.
Fractals aren't CODES.
Codes communicate MESSAGES/instructions . Do fractals send you messages?? Please post the medium and the messages they send you...?
CODES:
"We repeatedly consider the following scenario: a sender (say, A) wants to communicate or transmit some information to a receiver (say, B). The information to be transmitted is an element from some set X . It will be communicated by sending a binary string, called the message. When B receives the message, he can decode it again and (hopefully) reconstruct the element of X that was sent.
To achieve this, A and B NEED TO AGREE on a code or description method BEFORE communicating." {emphasis mine]
Grunwald, P., Vitanyi, P ; Algorithmic Information Theory; p. 10, 14 Sept 2005
http://www.illc.uva.nl/HPI/Algorithmic_Complexity.pdf
I claim that the formation of a snowflake is a 'cybernetic process'.
Snowflakes send you messages/instructions also?
Microscopic order (the flake is a six fold symmetric fractal) is created from a microscopic state (the water vapor is randomly distributed triatomic molecules).
We're not discussing mere "order" here, we're talking about Functional Sequence/Specified Complexity...
There are 3 Types of Complexity 1) random sequence complexity (RSC), 2) ordered sequence complexity (OSC), or 3) Functional Sequence Complexity (FSC)."
Random (RSC): fgskztosbclgdsk.
Order (OSC): hhhhhhdddddduuuuuu: Crystals, Snow Flakes, Sand Dunes, Fractals.
Functional Sequence Complexity (FSC): "It Puts The Lotion in the Basket", Sand Castles, The Genetic CODE, Barbecue Grills, Indy Cars, Hyper-NanoTech Machines and Robots (Kinesin, ATP Synthase, Flagellum, Cilia....ad nauseam) et al.
So RSC and OSC = "Nature" construct, "Shannon Information".
FSC = Intelligent Design Construct.
"In brief, living organisms are distinguished by their
specified complexity. Crystals are usually taken as the prototypes of simple well-specified structures, because they consist of a very large number of identical molecules packed together in a uniform way. Lumps of granite or random mixtures of polymers are examples of structures that are complex but not specified. The crystals fail to qualify as living because they lack complexity; the mixtures of polymers fail to qualify because they lack specificity"
Leslie E. Orgel, The Origins of Life: Molecules and Natural Selection, pg. 189 (Chapman & Hall: London, 1973
"The attempts to relate the idea of order...with biological organization or specificity must be regarded as
a play on words that cannot stand careful scrutiny. Informational macromolecules can code genetic messages and therefore can carry information because the sequence of bases or residues is affected very little, if at all, by [self-organizing] physicochemical factors".
H.P. Yockey; "A Calculation of Probability of Spontaneous Biogenesis by Information Theory"; Journal of Theoretical Biology 67, 1977; p. 390.
You angles in the fractal shape are a code.
Yea, if you're on shrooms.
regards
