Huh? Go ahead and show a case where "Information" is present and there is no sender and receiver....?
Yes, it's Functionally Sequence/Specifically Complex.
You only have 2 choices as to "How" we are here: Nature (Unguided) or Intelligent Design (GOD - Guided). The Laws of Physics, Chemistry/ Biochemistry, Information; and the tenets of Specific Complexity, Irreducible Complexity, and Common Sense Rule Nature out...Laughingly so. If you summarily rule one of the choices out.... where does it leave you?
Based on the Law of Non-Contradiction--- two things that are contradictory can't be responsible @ the same time (or do you disagree?). This is not a False Dichotomy (Bifurcation Fallacy) because there is no THIRD CHOICE. Now if I summarily refute Nature (Unguided) the choice MUST BE ID. YOU MAY THEN conjure thousands of possibilities under ID; however, it has ZERO to do with the tenets of first postulate.
It's not merely "complex"; again, it's Functional Sequence/Specifically Complexity that is the compelling factor of the matter.
There are 3 Types of Complexity 1) random sequence complexity (RSC), 2) ordered sequence complexity (OSC), or Functional Sequence Complexity (FSC)."
Random (RSC): fgskztosbclgdsk.
Order (OSC): hhhhhhdddddduuuuuu: Crystals, Snow Flakes, Sand Dunes.
Functional Sequence Complexity (FSC): "It Puts The Lotion in the Basket", Sand Castles, The Genetic CODE, Barbecue Grills, Indy Cars, Hyper-NanoTech Machines and Robots (Kinesin, ATP Synthase, Flagellum, Cilia....ad nauseam) et al.
So RSC and OSC = "Nature", "Shannon Information".
FSC = Intelligent Design Construct.
"In brief, living organisms are distinguished by their specified complexity. Crystals are usually taken as the prototypes of simple well-specified structures, because they consist of a very large number of identical molecules packed together in a uniform way. Lumps of granite or random mixtures of polymers are examples of structures that are complex but not specified. The crystals fail to qualify as living because they lack complexity; the mixtures of polymers fail to qualify because they lack specificity". {emphasis mine}
Leslie E. Orgel, The Origins of Life: Molecules and Natural Selection, pg. 189 (Chapman & Hall: London, 1973
"The attempts to relate the idea of order...with biological organization or specificity must be regarded as a play on words that cannot stand careful scrutiny. Informational macromolecules can code genetic messages and therefore can carry information because the sequence of bases or residues is affected very little, if at all, by [self-organizing] physicochemical factors".
H.P. Yockey; "A Calculation of Probability of Spontaneous Biogenesis by Information Theory"; Journal of Theoretical Biology 67, 1977; p. 390.
1. You can't even get the Physical Molecules, "Functional" (DNA/ RNA/ Proteins) "Naturally":
a. Functional DNA/RNA/Proteins NEVER spontaneously form "naturally", outside already existing cells, from Sugars, Bases, Phosphates, and Aminos, respectively.
It's Physically and Chemically IMPOSSIBLE!
That's just the Hardware!
To refute, Please show a Functional 30 mer- RNA or Protein (most are 250 AA or larger) that formed spontaneously "Outside" a Cell/Living Organism, CITE SOURCE! The smallest "Functional" DNA (Genome) is a little over 100,000 Nucleotides... so that ain't happenin.
Then the WOOLLY Mammoth in the Room...
b. How Did Stupid Atoms Write Their Own Software....? In other words, show how Ink/Paper/Glue Molecules can Author Technical Instruction Manuals/Blueprints...?
2. "millions of years"?? Please Scientifically Validate...Post the Formal Scientific Hypothesis then Experiment that confirms your claim...?
Please highlight the "Independent Variable" used in the TESTS....?
Can you validate that there is no "Interference", as you say?
Does that Rule Out HIS presence.
Validate that HE'S "Long Gone"....?
Original Design?? Are you saying it was different 'then' than now?
regards
!
