Brexit: the referendum


So, not this then:

.......We've only been a member of the EU for 40 odd years. We have plenty of evidence (at least a millenium) of how things are outside the organisation. There are also 170 odd countries which aren't in the EU, and their experience is good evidence of what life could be like outside the EU..........although clearly it would take a little research to weed out the irrelevant information.
:rolleyes:
 
A quick glance: The Leeds City Council bit is being a bit naughty.

I see where you are coming from, but it shows that it isn't a massive employer.

Would it be better to say that it is less than six times the number employed by the Houses of Parliament?

Given the need for translators, and the number of countries it serves, that seems pretty reasonable to me.
 
I see where you are coming from, but it shows that it isn't a massive employer.



Would it be better to say that it is less than six times the number employed by the Houses of Parliament?



Given the need for translators, and the number of countries it serves, that seems pretty reasonable to me.


The person is playing a silly trick. Or maybe he's genuinely stupid, I don't know - I've never met him.
He's trying to make it sound as if Leeds Council employees equals number of Leeds City Councillors, or people who make decisions affecting Leeds. Whatever his reasons he should remove the misleading statement.

"Employees", in the true sense, The EC wins obviously. (52,000?) over Leeds 15,000.

Just a nitpick but thank you for not tarring and feathering me.

Regarding actual voting members:
UK Parliament: about 650
EC: 28(?)
Which is better than the other, 650 or 28, I'm not qualified to say.
But I get your point.
 
A quick glance: The Leeds City Council bit is being a bit naughty.

There are more than a few which are a bit naughty. How about "We actually left a free trade zone (EFTA) to join the EU"........which is just nonsense. We left the EFTA to join the EEC, which was quite a different beast from the EU.
 
The person is playing a silly trick. Or maybe he's genuinely stupid, I don't know - I've never met him.
He's trying to make it sound as if Leeds Council employees equals number of Leeds City Councillors, or people who make decisions affecting Leeds. Whatever his reasons he should remove the misleading statement.

"Employees", in the true sense, The EC wins obviously. (52,000?) over Leeds 15,000.

Just a nitpick but thank you for not tarring and feathering me.

Regarding actual voting members:
UK Parliament: about 650
EC: 28(?)
Which is better than the other, 650 or 28, I'm not qualified to say.
But I get your point.

I make the European Commision at about 23k, from here Page 2

http://ec.europa.eu/civil_service/docs/europa_sp2_bs_sexe_x_age_en.pdf
 
There are more than a few which are a bit naughty. How about "We actually left a free trade zone (EFTA) to join the EU"........which is just nonsense. We left the EFTA to join the EEC, which was quite a different beast from the EU.

Yep, I noticed that but decided to keep quiet.
I'm sure there are more naughties but in all honesty I couldn't give a crap.
There will be naughties from both sides, such is life unfortunately.
 
We have plenty of evidence to understand the current situation but the issue for me is that their just doesn't seem to be any positive argument for leaving that arises from evidence.

How many millions of pounds per.day.is our net contribution to EU funds?
 
It really wasn't worth trying to have a sensible conversation on this subject, was it. I shouldn't have started the thread.

Which descriptive term did you object to: pigheaded or buffoon?

I see he descended to insulting the leader of the opposition's suit and tie in PMQs today.
 
How many millions of pounds per.day.is our net contribution to EU funds?

How much do we make in return by being members, in terms of ease of trade, freedom of movement and so on?
 
And if we can't negotiate that they can remain?

I'd be slightly surprised if we couldn't come to some arrangement but this to me sounds like the same mantra used by the Yes campaign in the recent Scottish independence referendum and which I mention above i.e. "everything will be the same but better because".

I really do not think things will be or even could remain the same for our many ex-pats in the EU if we exited the EU, and I have a very hard time imagining why things would be better for them if we exited the EU.

They may end up directly bearing one of the many costs we will incur if we decide to leave the EU.

The issues for expats are very simple at present most of us do not need work permits to work in our jobs in the EU or retain our residency or gain the equivalent work permits if we are self employed. There is no clarity from anyone in any embassy if we will need them if the UK vote is to leave. To apply for a work permit as a non EU citizen normally needs
1. The employer has to prove that he cannot find the same skills from the existing national population in a country.
2. The permit has to be granted before the person has a right to residency.
3. And every time we change jobs we would need to go through the same process again.
At present due to the refugee and immigration crisis in the EU work permits are very hard to come by in many EU countries. The Vienna treaty does not cover this as we have no acquired right as we have never needed work permits in the first place. Therefore at present there is a lot of uncertainty for the 2.2 million expats but on the other hand if we left the UK less than 15 years ago we do a get a vote and on that basis I suspect that many of us will vote to stay in on the basis that we know what rights we are voting for rather than the uncertainty of what may happen in what will no doubt be a set of difficult negotiations if the vote is to leave.
 
At present due to the refugee and immigration crisis in the EU work permits are very hard to come by in many EU countries. The Vienna treaty does not cover this as we have no acquired right as we have never needed work permits in the first place.

Didn't Brits need work permits prior to its joining the EU? It was my understanding that the 'acquired right' started in 1973.
 
In what way does being in the EU help us "tackle" multinationals?

In what way does the inability to tax multinationals properly have any impact on our sovereignty?



We've only been a member of the EU for 40 odd years. We have plenty of evidence (at least a millenium) of how things are outside the organisation. There are also 170 odd countries which aren't in the EU, and their experience is good evidence of what life could be like outside the EU..........although clearly it would take a little research to weed out the irrelevant information.

What sovereignty have we lost and what would we gain if we left and what practical changes would that result in?
 
The person is playing a silly trick. Or maybe he's genuinely stupid, I don't know - I've never met him.
He's trying to make it sound as if Leeds Council employees equals number of Leeds City Councillors, or people who make decisions affecting Leeds. Whatever his reasons he should remove the misleading statement.

"Employees", in the true sense, The EC wins obviously. (52,000?) over Leeds 15,000.

Just a nitpick but thank you for not tarring and feathering me.

Regarding actual voting members:
UK Parliament: about 650
EC: 28(?)
Which is better than the other, 650 or 28, I'm not qualified to say.
But I get your point.
I agree that the Leeds city Council comparison is misleading for the reasons you mention, but why are you then comparing the European Commission with the UK Parliament? That's like comparing the UK cabinet (22?) with, say, the European Parliament, which has 750 voting members.
 
Didn't Brits need work permits prior to its joining the EU? It was my understanding that the 'acquired right' started in 1973.

No you only get the acquired rights if it has been continuous in the period so in the case of work permits this right was in fact cancelled by our joining the EU and the fact that we no longer need them. There may be an argument if you have worked for the same employer since 1972 and had a work permit then but for most of us that will not hold. Also work permits are country specific whilst other visa in the EU are schengen based.
 
Last edited:
No you only get the acquired rights if it has been continuous in the period so in the case of work permits this right was in fact cancelled by our joining the EU and the fact that we no longer need them. There may be an argument if you have worked for the same employer since 1972 and had a work permit then but for most of us that will not hold. Also work permits are country specific whilst other visa in the EU are shengen based.

I see, cheers. Well, that could be rather dramatic. I imagine it will be one of the arguments put forward by the "stay" campaign.
 

Back
Top Bottom