The Theory of Relativity will begin to fall apart in 2016/2017

Status
Not open for further replies.
Daylightstar said:
..... for doing maths on your 'elastic ether', do you have them or not, Bjarne?
Click to expand...
And none of this either.

Doesn't it make you feel strange that you have to run away from stuff, Bjarne?
Don't you feel somewhat fraudulent, with all that trying to impress with mentioning e=mc2 while you know nothing about it?
 
Bjarne said:
It is mathematical nonsense and you know it ..
Click to expand...

No, I don't know that. Can you explain?

Try to calculate the energy of the universe- your get a result based on 75% dark matter we THINK must be there - 10% position energi we know do not exist and 15% energy based on matter that we can be sure is there .. - What a load of rubbish
Click to expand...

Really? Could you show your calculations in some more detail?

Hans
 
MRC_Hans said:
No, I don't know that. Can you explain?



Really? Could you show your calculations in some more detail?

Hans
Click to expand...

The question is only WHAT you can calculate
You cannot calculate anything you say not exist, - energy / mass cannot “hide” somewhere and therefore is your universe rubbish
 
Bjarne said:
It is mathematical nonsense and you know it ..
Click to expand...



This, from the fellow who can't even get the simplest measurement units correct. Bjarne, don't you feel even the least bit of dissonance when you make claims so far beyond your abilities?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
MikeG said:
Yeah, I think Bjarne is closing in on the "declare victory" phase after having his attack shattered by facts. Until you've got some maths, Bjarne, you've got nothing.
Click to expand...

Not just math, he has no actual/correct understanding of the concepts involved; Unless it is a factor of his flawed understanding of /use of English he seems to believe that to raise the water, an amount of water (a mass of water) must disappear into the void as energy.
 
fuelair said:
Not just math, he has no actual/correct understanding of the concepts involved; Unless it is a factor of his flawed understanding of /use of English he seems to believe that to raise the water, an amount of water (a mass of water) must disappear into the void as energy.
Click to expand...

Which is one of the reasons maths is so indespensible: it is universal, and doesn't suffer translation issues.
 
Darwin123 said:
'You' don't increase in mass at all. However, there is an increase in mass in the gravitational field between that connects you with the center of the earth according to special relativity.

The gravitational potential energy isn't really located in your body. It is actually located in the gravitational field between you and the earth. You have to include the energy density of the gravitational field.

Now if an outsider in deep space does work to lift you to the top of the stairs, neither your body nor the matter of the earth has changed. The work has increased the energy of the gravitational field. It is in the gravitational field that all the potential energy is located.

So you don't increase mass. The gravitational field has increased mass.


However, suppose that you climb the stairs on you own volition. Then, you are merely exchanging chemical potential energy of your body for the gravitational potential energy. You lose relativistic mass this way. In addition, you are expiring carbon dioxide and water. So you are losing mass. So if you climb the stairs with only your own energy and resources, then you losing mass.

In neither scenario does you body gain mass.
Click to expand...

I know but I am asking Bjarne about their theory...
 
Bjarne said:
Try to calculate the energy of the universe- your get a result based on 75% dark matter we THINK must be there - 10% position energi we know do not exist and 15% energy based on matter that we can be sure is there .. - What a load of rubbish
Click to expand...
What a load of ignorant rubbish, Bjarne.
If we match the WMAP data to cosmological models then we see that the density of the universe is made of 71.4% dark energy, 24% dark matter and 4.6% ordinary matter.
We have enormous evidence for the existence of matter :eek:!
We have overwhelming evidence for the existence of dark matter.
We have strong evidence for the existence of dark energy.
 
Reality Check said:
What a load of ignorant rubbish, Bjarne.
If we match the WMAP data to cosmological models then we see that the density of the universe is made of 71.4% dark energy, 24% dark matter and 4.6% ordinary matter.
We have enormous evidence for the existence of matter :eek:!
We have overwhelming evidence for the existence of dark matter.
We have strong evidence for the existence of dark energy.
Click to expand...

You have evidence of a big load of rubbish, that’s all you really have, and of course big evidence of collective brain damage
 
Bjarne seems to have given up all pretense of having any special insight into the workings of the universe, and is in full sneer-and-abuse mode. Which is only to be expected from someone who doesn't know any maths, and therefore can't have a proper conversation on the subject of cosmology.
 
MikeG said:
Bjarne seems to have given up all pretense of having any special insight into the workings of the universe, and is in full sneer-and-abuse mode. Which is only to be expected from someone who doesn't know any maths, and therefore can't have a proper conversation on the subject of cosmology.
Click to expand...

Not just not maths, but like you said also no special insights. And apparently not even ordinary insight or even any knowledge no matter how basic.

There's no chance he'll do better than this, he knows it and needs to compensate with more arrogance.
It keeps his cherished fantasy going.
 
Daylightstar said:
Not just not maths, but like you said also no special insights. And apparently not even ordinary insight or even any knowledge no matter how basic.

There's no chance he'll do better than this, he knows it and needs to compensate with more arrogance.
It keeps his cherished fantasy going.
Click to expand...

Honestly Bjarnes is rapidly approaching Jordan Pearce (yeah, the guy behind Spirt 'Science') levels of irrelevance and incoherence in my opinion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom