Hillary Clinton is Done

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hillary Clinton Is Not Electable

This article states a lot of the same things, many of us here have said for months. Good read!http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sadiq-samani/hillary-clinton-is-not-electable_b_9115828.html?

The punchline:

Hillary Clinton is Not Electable

Hillary Clinton is not electable. I've never voted for a presidential candidate before. I became a citizen in 2012 (before | after) and the first time I could vote was in the general election that year. I didn't vote for Obama or Romnney. I voted for a candidate in all the local elections, but in the box for President, I wrote myself in as a sign of protest. It sounds childish, but I didn't believe that either candidate represented my values. Even though Obama has made a lot of progress in our country, he is still a military interventionist and both him and Romney took money from millionaires and billionaires. That is unacceptable to me. I wanted to vote for President, but not for those guys.

This kind of thinking is why we ended up with president Bush instead of Gore. It not only sounds childish, it is childish.
 
Looks like a dead heat. Which is a loss for her, and a huge win for Sanders.

Wrong, a dead heat means Sanders has no killer advantage and he's way behind from S Carolina on.

Trophies for everyone!

A clear win would have been great! (for either side)

That isn't what happened.

Preseason's over!

(If we can get past coin-flipping and tally-gate)
 
... tally-gate)
CT forum that way --->>>>

Oh, and you might want better evidence than some anonymous comment on CSPAN coverage that was on the air live as it happened. There was no tally gate but it's a great laugh seeing the right wing echochamber falling for it.


:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Hillary was humiliated. Did you see her speech? She was PISSED OFF.

To the topic of this thread, she's not done YET, but you can see the end from here, and it is going to be UGLY. (Rather like her soul.)
Sanders couldn't win one of the states that favors him demographically the most, and is still trailing by 14 points nationally, and you're declaring victory?
 
Looks like a dead heat. Which is a loss for her, and a huge win for Sanders.


Not even close. Hillary is still polling thirty points ahead in South Carolina. Sanders needed a commanding win to sway southern voters. He didn't get it. He can win NH and maybe a couple other New England states, but he can't win the nomination.


Wrong, a dead heat means Sanders has no killer advantage and he's way behind from S Carolina on.

+1


To the topic of this thread, she's not done YET, but you can see the end from here, and it is going to be UGLY. (Rather like her soul.)


-1
 
By losing to Clinton you are winning? :confused:

Yes. By matching her 1:1 in Iowa and defeating her in NH, we are actually well ahead of the plan that was hatched a year ago, which had a loss in Iowa and a tie in NH as its assumptions. This effort has grown much faster than Sanders and his campaign director thought it would or even could.

The goal is to take this into June and win it there, and it amazingly looks quite doable.

And if anything more happens to Clinton on the email issue, it might not even go that long.

ETA: And we picked up a Superdelegate in SC who had previously endorsed Clinton yesterday, which means for the day, we did match 1:1 even with the coin tosses.
 
Last edited:
I find the email thing way over played. The country is sick to death of it, and if anything was to happen, it would have already. Same with Benghazi.
 
Yes. By matching her 1:1 in Iowa and defeating her in NH, we are actually well ahead of the plan that was hatched a year ago, which had a loss in Iowa and a tie in NH as its assumptions. This effort has grown much faster than Sanders and his campaign director thought it would or even could.

The goal is to take this into June and win it there, and it amazingly looks quite doable.

And if anything more happens to Clinton on the email issue, it might not even go that long.

ETA: And we picked up a Superdelegate in SC who had previously endorsed Clinton yesterday, which means for the day, we did match 1:1 even with the coin tosses.
Is this fantasy another joke?
 
Best I can determine, there is still an investigation happening. They are interviewing people.

Here's a former State Department Inspector General who assesses the apparent wrongdoing in the email business. But he contends a Democratic administration won't press charges at all, or at worst will take a plea-bargain to some small misdemeanor charge. He also notes the interesting fact that the State Department did not even have an Inspector General, who would have been monitoring this kind of (alleged) misconduct, during Clinton's entire term as SecState.
http://nypost.com/2016/01/31/this-was-all-planned-former-ig-says-hillary-state-dept-are-lying/
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom