Hillary Clinton Is Not Electable
This article states a lot of the same things, many of us here have said for months. Good read!http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sadiq-samani/hillary-clinton-is-not-electable_b_9115828.html?
Hillary Clinton is Not Electable
Hillary Clinton is not electable. I've never voted for a presidential candidate before. I became a citizen in 2012 (before | after) and the first time I could vote was in the general election that year. I didn't vote for Obama or Romnney. I voted for a candidate in all the local elections, but in the box for President, I wrote myself in as a sign of protest. It sounds childish, but I didn't believe that either candidate represented my values. Even though Obama has made a lot of progress in our country, he is still a military interventionist and both him and Romney took money from millionaires and billionaires. That is unacceptable to me. I wanted to vote for President, but not for those guys.
Looks like a dead heat. Which is a loss for her, and a huge win for Sanders.
Wrong, a dead heat means Sanders has no killer advantage and he's way behind from S Carolina on.
CT forum that way --->>>>... tally-gate)
There was no tally gate but it's a great laugh seeing the right wing echochamber falling for it.
Sanders couldn't win one of the states that favors him demographically the most, and is still trailing by 14 points nationally, and you're declaring victory?Hillary was humiliated. Did you see her speech? She was PISSED OFF.
To the topic of this thread, she's not done YET, but you can see the end from here, and it is going to be UGLY. (Rather like her soul.)
Looks like a dead heat. Which is a loss for her, and a huge win for Sanders.
Wrong, a dead heat means Sanders has no killer advantage and he's way behind from S Carolina on.
To the topic of this thread, she's not done YET, but you can see the end from here, and it is going to be UGLY. (Rather like her soul.)
Sanders couldn't win one of the states that favors him demographically the most, and is still trailing by 14 points nationally, and you're declaring victory?
You bet. Look at where we came from with Iowa. Hillary plus her PACs outspent us seriously there, and we still had a photo finish. We got this.
Hate to break it to you but Clinton already has 384 delegates to Sanders' 29.
Won't matter. We are winning this thing.
By losing to Clinton you are winning?![]()
By losing to Clinton you are winning?![]()
Is this fantasy another joke?Yes. By matching her 1:1 in Iowa and defeating her in NH, we are actually well ahead of the plan that was hatched a year ago, which had a loss in Iowa and a tie in NH as its assumptions. This effort has grown much faster than Sanders and his campaign director thought it would or even could.
The goal is to take this into June and win it there, and it amazingly looks quite doable.
And if anything more happens to Clinton on the email issue, it might not even go that long.
ETA: And we picked up a Superdelegate in SC who had previously endorsed Clinton yesterday, which means for the day, we did match 1:1 even with the coin tosses.
...and if anything was to happen, it would have already...
LOL!
Yes, because that's how investigations go! Charge people before they're finished!![]()
Hate to break it to you but Clinton currently has 384 delegates to Sanders' 29.
Won't matter. We are winning this thing.

Best I can determine, there is still an investigation happening. They are interviewing people.