Once again I will clarify a few points. NJR above is psychic
actress Noreen Jean Renier. Ms. Renier was born Noreen Jean Uzdavinis in Massachusetts in 1937 and is not French. She has not showcased any paranormal abilities according to researchers who tested her at Southern Oregon College and began her career as a professional
actress. Here, she fails to note that the lawsuit against me was in 1985. The location was where she lived at the time in the community of Phoenix Oregon. It had a population of less than 1900 residents in 1985. The small county courthouse which ruled against me had a jury of just six people --- not the traditional 12. And Ms. Renier had immediate family members in the community --- and many neighbors and friends. I found out later that before the case began Noreen Renier had spread commentary against me that was printed in the local paper -- a paper which failed to notify me of the stories nor sought my comments just days before the trial began. Later the same newspaper actually turned over my 'Letter to the Editor' without printing it and handed it to Noreen Renier instead!
Never does Noreen Renier admit this small Oregon courtroom in 1985 was her one and only win against me, nor that the 6-member jury awarded her less than 10% of what she asked --- and that amount after payment for her years of legal costs was reduced to about $4000. Nor has she ever admitted on her own website or here of the many lawsuits I filed later years against her in state courts (Oregon, Washington, Tennessee, Virginia, and Florida) where she failed to replicate her results. Nor does she like to cite the many federal courtrooms where I won rulings against her --- and with far larger financial wins ordered with payments made to me.
Absent too is any mention that five federal court judges ruled in my favor and agreed with the ruling from an earlier federal court that Noreen Renier was not a credible witness and had misled that federal court --- and again with all of those courts ruling in my favor. That actually came after a U.S. District Court in Seattle had also ruled in my favor with a ruling that Noreen Renier had breached an earlier Florida State settlement agreement with me --- and ordered her to pay more than $41,000 to me directly.
Indeed later when she ultimately declared bankruptcy with me as her principal creditor (though she also owed one of her attorneys more than $26,000 according to court records), that bankruptcy court appointed a Court Trustee who collected assets from her and paid them to me --- including copyright and related assets from the sale of her books. One of her publishers initially froze publication of her first book and then dropped re-publication altogether after a court ruled multiple chapters were clear breaches of earlier court settlement rulings.
Want the facts? --- this forum is filled with historical files about Noreen Renier, and my comments. Or you may wish to examine a website that has existed for more than ten years. Ms. Renier and her many attorneys (she's already been before six courts in Florida over the past year) have failed to showcase any errors or unsupported facts from what I understand against the following websites: See
https://www.globalnetresearch.com/statements.html and also
https://www.globalnetresearch.com/findings.html and if you are interested in why a U.S. Bankruptcy Court cited Noreen Renier as faiing to be credible, read
http://www.globalnetresearch.com/NoreenRenierBankruptcies.html A quick overview of any of these sites will highlight comments by six federal judges who ruled in my favor against Noreen Renier, and police and law enforcement officials, eye-witnesses, and also previous Renier supporters, interested parties, and comments from global researchers and investigators.
Ms. Renier can showcase little but 30-50 year old comments from either deceased parties (remember she claims to talk with the dead), or persons and groups investigators have repeatedly been unable to locate. I believe many of her cited supporters have never existed at all. The website in the links above has currently about a 40x larger viewership worldwide than her own. At 82 years old I am quite surprised that Noreen Renier believes she can obfuscate and change history. She has long been exposed in courtrooms for what she is --- and her performance in 1985 ultimately began a very steep downhill slide that has lasted for more than 35 years. She joins dozens of other psychic
actresses who fabricate events and stories for the naive.
John Merrell ("Sherlock" since 1982)
