Merged New telepathy test: which number did I write ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
No, not as far as I remember. However, the doctor I saw in September (you can view him here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfXO4_Zab6E) said something like "I use Freud's work, so I take telepathy seriously". He also said that I should not be forced to consult a psychiatrist against my will.

We're talking about the doctors during your hospitalization in a psychiatric horspital, not youtube doctors.

How did they try to convince you to take 'their' medication?

How come you have trouble remembering a diagnosis but remember the name for medicine offered to you but which you have rejected?
The medicine you claim was offered to you can be used in treatment of schizophrenia.
 
Last edited:
We're talking about the doctors during your hospitalization in a psychiatric horspital, not youtube doctors.

How did they try to convince you to take 'their' medication?

How come you have trouble remembering a diagnosis but remember the name and for medicine offered to you but which you have rejected?
The medicine you claim was offered to you can be used in treatment of schizophrenia.
I remember the medication that was proposed to me in 1995 (more than 20 years ago) because I was struck by the commercial name: Impromen.
There is nothing wrong for the doctor I met in his office to have a video on youtube. The important issue for me is to be protected from toxic pseudo-medications that are not appropriate for telepathy, and to have my still hypothetical telepathic specificity fully and honestly recognized, without cheating.
 
I remember the medication that was proposed to me in 1995 (more than 20 years ago) because I was struck by the commercial name: Impromen. ...

So you were not struck by a diagnosis at all?
How did they try to convince you to take Impromen?
 
I am generally not impressed by incompetence and I don't remember the details after more than 20 years.

But you claim to remember that they tried to convince you to take medicine.
How can you remember that but none of the details, especially the reason for the medicine?
In addition to that, the remembering of the name of the medicine is not subject to such limitations.

Did they offer you some 'sweets', 'vitamins', 'exotic fruits'?
 
But you claim to remember that they tried to convince you to take medicine.
How can you remember that but none of the details, especially the reason for the medicine?
In addition to that, the remembering of the name of the medicine is not subject to such limitations.

Did they offer you some 'sweets', 'vitamins', 'exotic fruits'?
No, but I do remember a big piece of cheese, this is one of the things that has remained in my memory. I also talked about telepathy with a roommate, I remember that he said, somewhat strangely: "I hear you when you talk, but I don't know it's you (who's talking)" (I had probably asked if he had sometimes an impression of perceiving my thoughts).
 
No, but I do remember a big piece of cheese, this is one of the things that has remained in my memory. I also talked about telepathy with a roommate, I remember that he said, somewhat strangely: "I hear you when you talk, but I don't know it's you (who's talking)" (I had probably asked if he had sometimes an impression of perceiving my thoughts).

Medication induced disassociation, a side effect. You in your own fragile condition were unable to deal with this appropriately.
Instead you latched your own psychosis onto another person experiencing a side effect from medication.

Of course, you could not possibly have known .....
 
Last edited:
... Ideally Michel should get the doctor to participate in this thread, some guidance as to the best way to help him from a qualified heath professional who knows him personally would be much appreciated. If, after reading what happened in all the previous "tests", the doctor thought it was worth trying again under their supervision I'm sure they are many posters here who would be happy to do so. ...
This is an interesting suggestion.
Although I disagree with the first part of your post:
Given Michel's propensity to misconstrue obvious sarcasm and even outright mockery as support, his interpretation of what this doctor said is suspect. ...
,
and also with the last part:
... In the meantime the conclusion that there is nothing to be gained by participating seems inescapable.
 
This is an interesting suggestion.
...

To you, sure. But it's not a good suggestion. You should not be assisted in your quest to redefine your decades old, un-remedied psychiatric problems as telepathy problems and prevent you from getting the necessary attention.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom