• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Apollo "hoax" discussion - continuation thread

19 miles off target for an unaimed projectile sent a quarter million miles is pretty good accuracy. Even the garbage from rocket science is impressive.
 
Foster Zygote said:
Cool! I can't wait to hear how it should have made a crater five hundred feet deep, or that it's just airbrushed because rocket's need air to push on.
Click to expand...


"During the impact, much of the energy went into crushing the booster, and only a shallow crater was formed."


Just wait until the 9/11 crowd get ahold of that bit.
 
Horatius said:
"During the impact, much of the energy went into crushing the booster, and only a shallow crater was formed."


Just wait until the 9/11 crowd get ahold of that bit.
Click to expand...


Of course they will handwave away the fact that the Towers fell under an acceleration of approx 9.8m/s2, so parts of the Towers are unlikely to have hit the ground at much more than 250 kph, while the booster would have struck the moon at something approaching 2600 m/s, about 9,300 km/h.
 
smartcooky said:
Of course they will handwave away the fact that the Towers fell under an acceleration of approx 9.8m/s2, so parts of the Towers are unlikely to have hit the ground at much more than 250 kph, while the booster would have struck the moon at something approaching 2600 m/s, about 9,300 km/h.
Click to expand...

Equals 17,000,000 Furlongs per Fortnight, for those who prefer such measurements.
 
Hans said:
http://www.space.com/31503-apollo-16-moon-rocket-crash-site-photo.html?cmpid=NL_SP_weekly_2016-1-04

Moon Mystery Solved! Apollo Rocket Impact Site Finally Found
Click to expand...
Pshaw! An obvious Photoshop fail. If that is the "real" booster, why did it take 46 years to find it? Anyway, space junk doesn't prove that humans walked on the Moon. Or is it a crash site from an experimental mission in which the humans all died while passing through the Van Allen Belt? Enquiring minds want to know. ;)
 
dropzone said:
Pshaw! An obvious Photoshop fail. If that is the "real" booster, why did it take 46 years to find it? Anyway, space junk doesn't prove that humans walked on the Moon. Or is it a crash site from an experimental mission in which the humans all died while passing through the Van Allen Belt? Enquiring minds want to know. ;)
Click to expand...

The space junk was planted by the all seeing aliens to further their vast conspiracy to take over and rule the world overtly that they already rule covertly.
 
dropzone said:
Pshaw! An obvious Photoshop fail. If that is the "real" booster, why did it take 46 years to find it? Anyway, space junk doesn't prove that humans walked on the Moon. Or is it a crash site from an experimental mission in which the humans all died while passing through the Van Allen Belt? Enquiring minds want to know. ;)
Click to expand...

If you take that 46 years and divide it by the square root of the height of the Great pyramid in Egyptian cubits you come out with a number that is the password of the NWO Swiss bank account.
 
Hans said:
If you take that 46 years and divide it by the square root of the height of the Great pyramid in Egyptian cubits you come out with a number that is the password of the NWO Swiss bank account.
Click to expand...

You forgot to say that you need to subtract the number you first thought of!
 
dropzone said:
Pshaw! An obvious Photoshop fail. If that is the "real" booster, why did it take 46 years to find it?
Click to expand...

It ain't like dustin' crops boy!!

Seriously, it is very difficult to find such a small crater even if you have a rough idea where to look

Firstly, they have not been actively searching, they merely found it when the LRO passed over the ares and photographes the general area.

Secondly, the LRO was launched in 2009, so of your 46 years, only the last six have involved the LRO.

Lastly, the crater simply is not visible from the earth, even using the largest telescope. To give you some idea of just how difficult this is, an object on the moon (384 million metres away) the size of a football stadium (about 180m across) will have an angular diameter of 0.09 arc seconds A large telescope about the size of the 5.1 m Hale Reflector at Mt. Palomar has a resolution of 0.05 arc seconds... that make the football stadium barely the size of a piece of grain on a photographic plate or a pixel on a high resolution digital camera.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom