Skeptic Ginger
Nasty Woman
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2005
- Messages
- 96,955
Regardless that this is about Bernie supporters, I'm pretty sure Sanders believes in the CT. It's fine to point out the disadvantage when most of the top DNC members are well known Clinton supporters. I think that's a valid issue.... It seems I can't click on any article lately on Hillary without running into a giant pile of "DNC is conspiring to crown Shillery the new queen!" type nonsense. They act like Hillary is somehow the ultimate villain on the stage. They first complain that the debates were scheduled wrong. Then, when Bernie failed to win over anyone new in them, they complained the questions were rigged. One guy on social media claims that the debates have been run from the outset to be huge Hillary commercials. Which is strange since the original conspiracy is that no one was going to watch them.
But for Sanders to claim it's hurting his campaign when his whole premise is he doesn't need the establishment because he has the people's support, is a contradiction.
There's no question the media coverage this go round sucks big time. But it's been Clinton scandals (that so far have faded because they amounted to nothing but GOP smear campaign) followed by Trump day and night. Sheesh, MSNBC is running a 'Trump, The Man' special tonight, hosted by Chris Matthews.
Who, by the way, has a well documented history of negative feelings toward Clinton and positive comments on Sanders. Matthews was caught with Tom Delay years ago, with his mike on, making sexist comments about no one liking bossy women and they were referring directly to Clinton.
Matthews was also an Obama supporter when Obama ran against Clinton. The point being, Sanders has media supporters, they aren't all pro-Clinton. Sanders got a fair amount of coverage when his crowds were making the news. His union endorsement got coverage. Maybe he needs to do more newsworthy stuff like Trump.
The point is, if Sanders is blaming the DNC and the corporate media, I think his case is a lot weaker than the people making excuses would like it to be.
We're back to my issue with Sanders. He's got the right ideas, but the public is just not behind him in big enough numbers to accomplish what he's trying to accomplish. Hopefully, should he lose the primary as it currently appears he will, it won't cause all his supporters to give up. If the momentum keeps growing, maybe by the time Warren is ready to run for President, more progress can be made.
Maybe the pressure on Clinton, or the support for that matter because I'm not convinced she's in bed with Wall Street, will give her more incentive to push harder against the corporatocracy.
She wasn't that different from Obama. I still think we could have used her added experience the last 8 years and Obama would now make a better President. Both of them are incredibly intelligent....For me it is all becoming a bit much. I don't really see Bernie as that different from Hillary who is, however, very different from the long line of sentient wet hippopotamus farts that is the GOP candidates. Really I don't. In the same way I didn't see her as that different from Obama in 2008. Bernie, I think, has become more myth than man. I think many have lost sight of their similarities having gotten lost deep in the jungle of hyperbole.
Last edited: