{Sigh} That didn't take long.

...
It probably won't interest you in the least, but I think there's an enormous amount of evidence showing that most of the mess currently in the ME and being exported around the world has its origins in USA screwing the place up.
Shades of gray.
Plus, history did not begin 1949 or so.
The US wasn't the only state actor screwing the ME. The Saudis have never been exactly guardian angels ever since they took control of Mecca, and less so since oil was found.
The British and French screwed before the US.
And the Ottomans before them.
And the Crusades before them.
And Mohammed's horde's before them.
And the Romans before them.
Etc. etc.
Bomb bomb bomb the New Kingdom of Egypt! :mad:
 
Shades of gray.
Plus, history did not begin 1949 or so.
The US wasn't the only state actor screwing the ME. The Saudis have never been exactly guardian angels ever since they took control of Mecca, and less so since oil was found.
The British and French screwed before the US.
And the Ottomans before them.
And the Crusades before them.
And Mohammed's horde's before them.
And the Romans before them.
Etc. etc.
Bomb bomb bomb the New Kingdom of Egypt! :mad:

What is amusing is that the poster we are discussing piously insists he is not Anti American....but he blames the US for everything wrong in the world today.
 
Paul Craig Roberts is at it, too. Very prolific blogger.

Another Paris False Flag Attack? (Nov 13) (What's the name again of this law that states that every headline that is a question can be answered "No"?)

The Matrix Extends Its Reach (Nov 14) - "Whether or not the Paris attacks were a false flag operation for the purpose of obtaining these results [border closings, appeasement of anti-immigrant political parties], these results are the consequences of the attacks."

French Security Left Blind During Paris Attacks (Nov 15) "I have received a report from European security that there was a massive cyber attack on French systems 48 hours prior to and during the Paris attacks." Then PCR speaks of some state being behind that, insinuates attackes were therefore a false flag. But then chickens out: "I am unable to reveal any further information." Yeah. Right. Shmock!

Food For Thought: The Found Passport (Nov 15)
 
What has always fascinated me about Conspiracy Theorists, especially the ones who think that this sort of thing has been going on for hundreds of years, is where is the ENDIF?

Is there an ultimate goal, and if these sort of so-called false flag events can be pulled off so flawlessly to trick the 7 Billion people on this mudball, how is it that the "ultimate purpose", whatever that is, cannot or has not been achieved?

I know this has been said thousands of times before, but how can the PTB be so clever, and so stupid at the same time? "They" are clever enough to do anything and manipulate any event, but can never get to the end of the game. It seems to be like the road to Brigadoon. You can't get there from here.

Norm
 
The big problem is that there is not a lot of solid information yet about the attacks in Paris. There was a huge blast in Beirut that day too.

Notice that there's been little cell-phone video footage released. The French police are sorting through it all instead of posting it to whip up public sentiment. All those kids at that concert, none of them had a phone? I doubt it.

Before people can whine about false flags they should wait to see what the flag actually is.
 
The big problem is that there is not a lot of solid information yet about the attacks in Paris. There was a huge blast in Beirut that day too.

Notice that there's been little cell-phone video footage released. The French police are sorting through it all instead of posting it to whip up public sentiment. All those kids at that concert, none of them had a phone? I doubt it.

Before people can whine about false flags they should wait to see what the flag actually is.

The very name, Eagles of Death Metal, says it all! Further, the entire band 'escaped!' They were in the center of it all, right out in the open, even spotlighted. Yet none of these gunmen could shoot these evil perpetrators of drugs and sexual license.

This has CIA written all over it!!
 
The cluesforum scum can't make up their minds. Firstly, when footage emerges of the moment the attack inside the Bataclan starts we have one of them opining:

The video seems interrupted too soon, though, or cut short at the wrong time, because the following moments could have been much more interesting. The spectator should have panned away, and scream could have begun to be heard, for example. But if it's fake, the shots could be the consequence of a dubbing job, of course. Or maybe the guy runs away but they're shooting blanks, I don't know

Yeah, how dare they not consider the needs of a bunch of retards by not risking their life.

Then on the next page we have footage and an image of a blood covered venue strewn with the bodies of actually slaughtered people, to which we get:

Agreed. Is it supposed to be a photo taken by a surviving concertgoer sitting in the balcony? No one is going to the aid of the victims, and at least one officer has his rifle raised, which would imply that the crime scene has not yet been secured. But if that is the case, why would they be taking a cellphone photo at that moment, instead of hiding/playing dead, trying to get the attention of the officers, or receiving medical attention? Why are there five police just standing there clustered together, on the opposite side of the balcony, if there is still a potential threat? Shouldn't they be spread out, minimizing their bodily exposure, and clearing the other rooms, instead of posing for a cellphone photo?

and


What is this guy doing wandering around filming with his cell phone amidst a shootout? Why are there no police securing the crime scene? Where is the SAMU? Shouldn't the place be surrounded with emergency personnel at this point?

So, stopping filming and running for your life is deeply suspicious, and actually filming is deeply suspicious.

If you're a moron.
 
All those kids at that concert, none of them had a phone? I doubt it

Someone that is not complete moron would understand that in this situation everyone would be busy dying, running away or taking cover. Taking photo in this situation is like big "shoot me" arrow hovering over you.
 
Paul Craig Roberts is at it, too. Very prolific blogger.

Another Paris False Flag Attack? (Nov 13) (What's the name again of this law that states that every headline that is a question can be answered "No"?)

The Matrix Extends Its Reach (Nov 14) - "Whether or not the Paris attacks were a false flag operation for the purpose of obtaining these results [border closings, appeasement of anti-immigrant political parties], these results are the consequences of the attacks."

French Security Left Blind During Paris Attacks (Nov 15) "I have received a report from European security that there was a massive cyber attack on French systems 48 hours prior to and during the Paris attacks." Then PCR speaks of some state being behind that, insinuates attackes were therefore a false flag. But then chickens out: "I am unable to reveal any further information." Yeah. Right. Shmock!

Food For Thought: The Found Passport (Nov 15)

And in 2015 Conspriacy Loons are STILL Obssesed with "The Matrix".?
That is SO 2003.
 
They don't even look that alike. The only thing they have in common are their shared gender, brownish hair and the same grief pose.
 
and yes, the twoofers are spotting "crisis actors", ie, people who look vaguely like other people at other events.

http://www.rawstory.com/2015/11/des...omen-to-prove-that-paris-attacks-were-staged/



This crisis actor nonsense finally annoyed me enough to make another comic....


full.png
 
Usual suspect Kevin Barrett gets right to work on the horrific Paris attacks.

Another French false flag?

Almost every really big, spectacular terror attack turns out, after extensive critical examination, to have been the usual state-sponsored false-flag stuff. There is no reason to think this one will be any different.

The first question, as always, is: Who gains? And the answer, as always, is: Authoritarian insiders. Zionists. Militarists. Islamophobes. New World Order-Out-Of-Chaos freaks
.


http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/11/13/charlie2/

Disgusting.

Is there any possible terror attack where the (wink) "Zionists" (wink) don't stand to gain?
 

Back
Top Bottom