Skeptic Ginger
Nasty Woman
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2005
- Messages
- 96,955
For pete's sake, get a room, you two.
No thanks, he's not my type, too uptight.
**It's a joke before the mods accuse me of insulting Damion.
For pete's sake, get a room, you two.
Which conclusion are you talking about?
ETA: If it is the coffee => sex thing, please see my comment above.
You asked a question that requires your interpretation to be true.
You seem to be bouncing back and forth, here. Was this encounter likely #2, as you state in the first quote, or likely #3 as you allege in the second quote?
No idea who said that.I think it sets women's lib back a half century to act like we don't like sex as much as the next guy or to call us whores if we do.
Very well, please mentally replace 'allege' with 'imply'. The point stands, though. In the first quote, you bet that the situation is #2, yet in the second quote, the situation is implied to be #3. You are being inconsistent.My question does not allege anything. It posed to determine where someone stands in a case where both parties understand that sex is on offer.
Anyone who fears the possibility that someone might not take no for an answer, I would suppose.As long as you take no for an answer, who cares?
Very well, please mentally replace 'allege' with 'imply'. The point stands, though. In the first quote, you bet that the situation is #2, yet in the second quote, the situation is implied to be #3. You are being inconsistent.
In the manner which Watson claimed was done, that isIt was not intended to distinguish between #2 and #3, but feel free to answer the question both ways.
Q1: "Would you personally consider it polite to ask for coffee (not sex) from someone to whom you've never spoken a word, after encountering them in an enclosed space, at 4am, in a country that is foreign to them?"
Q2: "Would you personally consider it polite to ask for coffee in hopes of sex from someone to whom you've never spoken a word, after encountering them in an enclosed space, at 4am, in a country that is foreign to them?"
Q3: "Would you personally consider it polite to ask for coffee by which you mean sex from someone to whom you've never spoken a word, after encountering them in an enclosed space, at 4am, in a country that is foreign to them?"
And how is your agreement here consistent with your thinking it's a social faux pas for a guy to test the water?No idea who said that.
ETA: Of course, I agree with this statement. But then so does Rebecca.
Anyone who fears the possibility that someone might not take no for an answer, I would suppose.
It doesn't, though.
Would you personally consider it polite to ask forcoffeesex from someone to whom you've never spoken a word
And how is your agreement here consistent with your thinking it's a social faux pas for a guy to test the water?
It was polite, politely declined and politely retracted.
.So a guy acts perfectly polite and it's his fault the girl finds it creepy?
I never said it was a faux pas to test the waters, in general.
Even under the particular conditions which obtain here, I never said it was a faux pas for just one sex.

You've been pushing quite hard for agreement that it is not polite, yet it's also not a faux pas?
Reread what I wrote, especially the last four words.