Yeah, the one that's absolutely tiny and impossible to make out any details to begin with that every debunker uses with zeal to support the official timeline.
If you want one example, look at post #6 in this thread.
So predictable.
Baby - bathwater.
In some images, you can make out those details on the the screen easily.
In some images, you can
almost make out those details on the the screen, but better to corroborate
In some images, you can't read time, logo or captions on screens, but you still have the scene displayed to work with, and you know already how to synchronize the scenes with TV archives.
You previously already accepted the analysis that puts V1546-03 at 9:29, despite the TV clock not being visible:
https://dotmafia.wordpress.com/newl...norman-mineta-testimony-and-the-implications/
In
V1546-04,
-05 and
-06 I think you will agree that the TV clock, displayed on a TV screen that appears about 260x250 pixels and has the clock on a dark background with good contrast, shows 9:30 and 9:31, corroborated by Bush's speech, which was held at that time.
Similarly, the clock is large with sufficient contrast in
V1546-10,
-11 and
-12 and shows 9:33 each time.
In V1546-13, the TV clock is slightly ambiguous to me (more out of focus than the previous ones, I think), so
I did an alanysis of the scene, and found it to be exactly at 09:36:06.
Similarly,
V1546-14 is precisely at 09:36:24 according to
this analysis.
And
V1546-15 is precisely at
09:36:43.
See, we can timestamp TV images quite exactly in many cases, and there is no need to photoshop anything.
