911myths on Mineta, Cheney and Clarke

[Axxman300]

The last VCR is being made this month. The time will come when no one will know what those black lines mean, and this picture will be accepted as a historical document representing truth instead of fraud.

We've already established your ignorance of photography with the wide-angle lens issue earlier in this thread.

That black line of the TV is there because it's a CRT, the photographer set his lens speed to capture natural lighting, and what is on the screen is the CRT refreshing the image. Any non-moron who took a picture of a television between 1949 and 2007 usually got the same black line.

You can read more here (well, not you as we all know you don't bother fact-checking):

http://digital-photography-school.com/how-to-photograph-an-image-on-a-tv/

Most VCRs by 2001 had 4 heads allowing for a clean image when the footage was paused. Anybody single male in the western world could tell you 4-heads took watching porn to the next level.

Either way, you continue to fail.

 

[Wolrab]

Cheney didn't change his shoes. That set of legs was retracted into his carapace.

 

[Jrrarglblarg]

The last VCR is being made this month. The time will come when no one will know what those black lines mean, and this picture will be accepted as a historical document representing truth instead of fraud.

[qimg]https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/394/19730266319_8f9f691112_b.jpg[/qimg]

I doubt this is the first picture in the National Archives that does not represent the truth. How many other documents are forgeries and frauds? What is our real history, when the documents representing it are fake?

The black line on the tv? That has nothing to do with VHS. Whoever told you that was your enemy.

That's an artifact of cathode ray tv scanning frequency as sampled by a camera shutter. If I thought you were capable of learning I'd waste time teaching you how to calculate the shutter speed from the width of the bar.

 

[Gamolon]

The time will come when no one will know what those black lines mean,

http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/question336.htm

 

[Elagabalus]

The black line on the tv? That has nothing to do with VHS. Whoever told you that was your enemy.

That's an artifact of cathode ray tv scanning frequency as sampled by a camera shutter. If I thought you were capable of learning I'd waste time teaching you how to calculate the shutter speed from the width of the bar.

Dare I ask why FF thinks the black line is significant?

You can also check the shutter calibration on your camera.

http://rick_oleson.tripod.com/index-135.html

https://books.google.com/books?id=A...wopage&q=check shutter speed tv screen&f=true

 

[FalseFlag]

No, but then again, I was not a politician with lots of money to afford lots of shoes.

This made me laugh, for real.

There is no way that even you can say this with a straight face.

 

[FalseFlag]

Evidence shows that he's here to waste people's time and insult them, period.

Proof? Please provide credible proof to support your claim.

 

[FalseFlag]

The black line on the tv? That has nothing to do with VHS. Whoever told you that was your enemy.

I'm not talking about the line that goes all the way across the screen. I'm talking about the two small black lines at the bottom right hand corner of the screen. This issue has already been discussed.

 

[MileHighMadness]

Proof? Please provide credible proof to support your claim.

FF...when are you going to provide evidence to support your claim? Oh sorry, I forgot, you don't have any. vbg

 

[FalseFlag]

Are you honestly telling me you don't see the irony of this statement?

I see what is there. Two reasonable people can see the same thing, admit they see the same thing, and then come to two different, reasonable conclusions.

That is not what happens on this forum.

Skeptics refuse to see what is clearly there. They deny it. What happens here is totally different.

 

[cantonear1968]

I see what is there. Two reasonable people can see the same thing, admit they see the same thing, and then come to two different, reasonable conclusions.

That is not what happens on this forum.

Skeptics refuse to see what is clearly there. They deny it. What happens here is totally different.

And you feel you're the reasonable one in this conversation?

That's interesting.

What has lead you to this conclusion?

 

[skyeagle409]

Skeptics refuse to see what is clearly there. They deny it. What happens here is totally different.

Well, explain why no CD explosions are heard in the following video.


WTC 7 Video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A

 

[Jrrarglblarg]

I'm not talking about the line that goes all the way across the screen. I'm talking about the two small black lines at the bottom right hand corner of the screen. This issue has already been discussed.

Can you provide a link to a higher res version of the image? I zoom in and it becomes moosh, so I really have no idea what "two small black lines" you are talking about.

It also seems like very weak tea, if this is your level of evidence for 9/11 shenanigans, an image arifact you don't understand and someone changing shoes at some point in a workday.

Sorry, I'm not seeing your VHS artifact.

 

[Bitca]

Can you provide a link to a higher res version of the image? I zoom in and it becomes moosh, so I really have no idea what "two small black lines" you are talking about.

It also seems like very weak tea, if this is your level of evidence for 9/11 shenanigans, an image arifact you don't understand and someone changing shoes at some point in a workday.

Sorry, I'm not seeing your VHS artifact.

Here's the original: https://www.flickr.com/photos/usnationalarchives/19730266319/in/album-72157656213196901/


It's showing ABC at about 9:31, which you can see at archive.org

It appears he's talking about the timestamp and temperature in the lower right.

 

[FalseFlag]

FF...when are you going to provide evidence to support your claim? Oh sorry, I forgot, you don't have any. vbg

What claim do you want me to prove?

 

[FalseFlag]

Here's the original: https://www.flickr.com/photos/usnationalarchives/19730266319/in/album-72157656213196901/


It's showing ABC at about 9:31, which you can see at archive.org

It appears he's talking about the timestamp and temperature in the lower right.

Thank you for posting this again, even though it has already been discussed.

 

[beachnut]

Shoe claim as idiotic as CD and thermite. Dumbed down for the 9/11 truth cult members

When CD and thermite were not idiotic enough... up comes the superior insanity of Cheney Shoes.

9/11 truth, the movement which exposes the ignorance of the 9/11 truth believers to be overwhelming.

With no evidence, 9/11 truth reduced to nonsensical claims toddlers can debunk; and off topic. Doubt the failed followers of 9/11 truth have a clue what the OP was about.

 

[FalseFlag]

When CD and thermite were not idiotic enough... up comes the superior insanity of Cheney Shoes.

If I do something, I do it right. I make no exception for insanity. My motto is, "Go big, or go home."

With no evidence, 9/11 truth reduced to nonsensical claims toddlers can debunk.

If "Cheney Shoes" is so simple to debunk that toddlers can do it, then you should have no problem pointing out the stitching on the soles of the shoes Cheney is wearing in his office. Please point it out on all of the pictures where the soles are visible. The stitching should be pretty easy to spot, considering it's white or off-white. Go ahead, please show me.

 

[skyeagle409]

If I do something, I do it right. I make no exception for insanity. My motto is, "Go big, or go home."

If you suggest that CD explosives were used, then you can pack your bags and head for home because it would have been impossible to properly prepare the WTC buildings for explosive demolition and not attract lots of attention and complaints.

 

[Andy_Ross]

Standard Conspiracy Theory.
Pick some obscure detail, claim it is sn important 'smoking gun' and ignore everything else.

Remember, the objective isn't to win anything or convince anyone, it's just to keep the thread churning.