Hello FalseFlag, welcome to the forum. I don't know if you've followed my posts here but I'm a 99% convinced (that there isn't a reason to question the broad, so-called 'official' narrative of 9/11) poster. I still consider myself to be 'on the fence' but with my legs very much dangling over one side. I hope you don't stop posting as there aren't enough posters here who will tolerate even 0.000000000000000001% of doubt about any aspect of the 'official' narrative without flying into sarcasm, group-think (note how many posters refer to the forum in the first person plural, implying that we are of one mind like 'The Borg' - 'convince us', 'that's not what we are saying' etc...) and insults.
For the benefit of people like me, who try not to indulge in these things, could you outline precisesly what it is you are claiming with each statement backed up by what evidence you believe supports it. You may have already done this but since this thread has degenerated into a lot of insults I've pretty much gone into 'skim-read mode' and may have missed it. Thanks.
By thy way, I'm referring to your claims about the photographs and the 9/11 timeline etc..., not whether posters here are in the NSA (Oystein beat me to it!)
For the benefit of people like me, who try not to indulge in these things, could you outline precisesly what it is you are claiming with each statement backed up by what evidence you believe supports it. You may have already done this but since this thread has degenerated into a lot of insults I've pretty much gone into 'skim-read mode' and may have missed it. Thanks.
By thy way, I'm referring to your claims about the photographs and the 9/11 timeline etc..., not whether posters here are in the NSA (Oystein beat me to it!)



