Hillary Clinton is Done

Status
Not open for further replies.
Skeptic Ginger said:
The election is more than a year off. I'm sure she will.
Click to expand...

Come on Ginger, you're an exceptionally smart woman, does this look like the campaign of a winner?

She and her team have no clue on how to present her, never have. A know nothing community organizer swooped in and easily took it from her. You need to switch to Bernie, he's at least real.
 
Last edited:
TheL8Elvis said:
....
I guess I am just confused how you can overlook the President not thinking about it (if he thought about it all) , but you have a problem when HRC claims she didn't think about what kind of email system there would be ...
​
Click to expand...

What? She made a deliberate decision -- probably a series of decisions -- to create and maintain a unique private email system and pay for it herself. How can she -- or you -- claim she "didn't think about" it? Whether it was smart or legal are other questions. But to claim she didn't think about it is just insulting. And I suspect that after the President received his first email from HC, her address went into his "contacts" list and he might never have even looked at it again. She created her system, he just received emails.

Her story reminds me of her claim years ago that she had no idea how a sheaf of subpoenaed Whitewater documents just mysteriously turned up in the White House residence after being "missing" for two years. The most heavily protected private residence in the world, and a stranger secretly entered and left unseen? "Gee, I dunno, I didn't think about it...."
http://www.nytimes.com/1996/01/06/us/elusive-papers-of-law-firm-are-found-at-white-house.html
 
Last edited:
logger said:
Come on Ginger, you're an exceptionally smart woman, does this look like the campaign of a winner?

She and her team have no clue on how to present her, never have. A know nothing community organizer swooped in and easily took it from her. You need to switch to Bernie, he's at least real.
Click to expand...

Yes I am an intelligent woman and a high information voter. That's why I can look at the actual candidates and not the sound bites marketed to the low information voters. :cool:
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
Yes I am an intelligent woman and a high information voter. That's why I can look at the actual candidates and not the sound bites marketed to the low information voters. :cool:
Click to expand...

Watching Clinton crash and burn AGAIN is not a sound bite. She is simply incapable of winning a national campaign, wouldn't you agree?
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
Yes I am an intelligent woman and a high information voter. That's why I can look at the actual candidates and not the sound bites marketed to the low information voters. :cool:
Click to expand...

is that why you linked the Andrea Mitchell interview in which Hillary humiliated herself about not thinking about her private server as proof that she was "competent"?

:rolleyes:
 
Clearly you don't want to discuss the fact that the president and high level people all knew that she was using a private email server, and didn't have a @state.gov email, and didn't stop her. That's clearly relevant to how not a big deal the administration thought her actions were.

Bob001 said:
What? She made a deliberate decision -- probably a series of decisions -- to create and maintain a unique private email system and pay for it herself. How can she -- or you -- claim she "didn't think about" it? Whether it was smart or legal are other questions. But to claim she didn't think about it is just insulting. And I suspect that after the President received his first email from HC, her address went into his "contacts" list and he might never have even looked at it again. She created her system, he just received emails.
Click to expand...

Based on the current outcomes, do you really think she put a lot of thought into it ???

Surely she can claim she "didn't think about" it? Because all she had to ask is - "am I allowed to control my own email ?" and if she is told yes, then say "OK great, make it happen..."

ETA: there is a whole thread over here about her email if you want to discuss it further. Suffice it to say for this thread, I don't think she's done because of her email.
 
Last edited:
logger said:
Watching Clinton crash and burn AGAIN is not a sound bite. She is simply incapable of winning a national campaign, wouldn't you agree?
Click to expand...
It's always interesting how a candidate that polls better than every single candidate on the right is 'crashing and burning'. If Clinton is doing that badly, what does that say about every GOPer in the clown car?
 
wareyin said:
It's always interesting how a candidate that polls better than every single candidate on the right is 'crashing and burning'. If Clinton is doing that badly, what does that say about every GOPer in the clown car?
Click to expand...
That would be the elephant in the room. The elephant which I've asked again and again if they would address in my thread about Republican candidates. They have mostly ignored it for obvious reasons, the only shot Republicans have at winning is not to promote their candidate over the Democrat but to try to push down the Democrat far enough to elevate whatever clown emerges from their clown car above the Democrat.
 
DavidJames said:
That would be the elephant in the room. The elephant which I've asked again and again if they would address in my thread about Republican candidates. They have mostly ignored it for obvious reasons, the only shot Republicans have at winning is not to promote their candidate over the Democrat but to try to push down the Democrat far enough to elevate whatever clown emerges from their clown car above the Democrat.
Click to expand...

weird, when exactly did she win the primary again? You'd think that would have been in the news, particularly given the terrible campaign she has run to date.

She is behind in New Hampshire, and Joe Biden is likely going to enter the race
 
wareyin said:
It's always interesting how a candidate that polls better than every single candidate on the right is 'crashing and burning'. If Clinton is doing that badly, what does that say about every GOPer in the clown car?
Click to expand...

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...s/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html

In 30 days her lead over the biggest clown in the car dropped from 14+ points to less than the margin of error, and that isn't 'crashing and burning'? You know what they say about a certain river in Egypt.
 
16.5 said:
weird, when exactly did she win the primary again? You'd think that would have been in the news, particularly given the terrible campaign she has run to date.

She is behind in New Hampshire, and Joe Biden is likely going to enter the race
Click to expand...

It's so cute how you pin your hopes on someone who has said he's not going to run. What resident of the GOP clown car can beat her, again?
 
JohnnyG said:
You deny 'crash and burn', I point you to trend, you say I'm the denialist.
LOL
Click to expand...

Crash and burn clearly does not mean 'still beating our best guy', unless one is in denial about the reality of the polls. When one has 'crashed and burned', one is done, not still the winner.
 
wareyin said:
Crash and burn clearly does not mean 'still beating our best guy', unless one is in denial about the reality of the polls. When one has 'crashed and burned', one is done, not still the winner.
Click to expand...

If the elections were in the next few days I would agree, but this far out?

If you don't like 'crash and burn' maybe you might prefer 'SS Hillary Titanic', 'falling like dominoes', or 'crumbling like a house of cards'.

Regardless of the phrase, to think she is still likely to win when she has fallen in each of the four latest polls and loses in the latest one, is not a realistic view of the situation.
 
16.5 said:
weird, when exactly did she win the primary again?...
Click to expand...
I dunno, when exactly did she lose? When did her poll numbers show her losing in the Primary? In the latest poll summary she's ahead by almost 25 points.

State by state the polls are all over the map. (I made a pun :) )

You seem to think the election is over. Voting hasn't even started and campaigning has barely begun. :rolleyes:

It's rather funny you guys have drunk so much Hillary-hater koolaide you think being ahead by 25 points in the Democratic Primary means Clinton is done. And Biden entering the race might have the effect of splitting the Biden/Sanders vote rather than turning the primary to a Biden/Clinton race.
 
Last edited:
16.5 said:
Further, it is not just that she is not transparant, it is that is that she has a sneering contempt for open government and the truth.
Click to expand...

In that case you must despise Walker and the republican legislature in Wisconsin.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom