• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Lord Language Resurrection.

Status
Not open for further replies.
In certain religious traditions, most emphatically including the primitive Israelite cult of YHWH from which Judaism later evolved, the outcome of sortition was regarded as an expression of the will of supernatural beings, and was therefore treated with veneration. Elected office bearers are obviously chosen by people; but ones selected by lot are thought to be chosen by the god, and that is more impressive to the primitive mind. Primitive minds think that everything is determined by the decision of intelligent beings, either human, or supernatural.

... (T)he practice of lots was used frequently in ancient Israel.
The primary reason for casting lots was to render an impartial, unbiased decision on important matters. Once they were cast, no one could argue that the decision was the result of human intervention like nepotism, politics, favoritism, and so on. This practice would be the same as throwing dice or flipping a coin we commonly use today. In ancient times, they used varying means to cast lots, depending on the place and local customs, such as coins, polished sticks, cards, dice, and so on.

What is particularly significant is the fact that, in ancient Israel, the High Priest did use from time to time the tradition of casting lots for important, uncertain decisions. It amounted to consulting God for the answer, as Proverbs states "The lot is cast into the lap, but its every decision is from the Lord" (Proverbs 16:33).​
http://www.biblestudy.org/question/what-is-casting-lots.html

Later religions, including of course later Judaism, evolved beyond that, and are more content with election as an expression of rational thought. But NC has reverted to proto-historic primitivism.

This is why I love this forum, I learn something with each visit.:thumbsup:

Now for your next challenge, Figure out the floating zeppelin temples and Robot judges.
 
This is why I love this forum, I learn something with each visit.:thumbsup:

Now for your next challenge, Figure out the floating zeppelin temples and Robot judges.


Easy.
The floating Zeppelin temples deliver water filters to people who the robot judges have deemed worthy.
I think I get a farm and some pigs if I can keep my foreskin, and we have to read four books whilst eating raw chicken.
If we wear paper hats the Zeppelin temples will not kill us.
 
Easy.
The floating Zeppelin temples deliver water filters to people who the robot judges have deemed worthy.
I think I get a farm and some pigs if I can keep my foreskin, and we have to read four books whilst eating raw chicken.
If we wear paper hats the Zeppelin temples will not kill us.

The only missed part is the ESSENTIAL giant poop which s to rid yourself of all the evil.
 
What you mean?
"Fake jews" - give your definition please.
It is not fagin's definition. It is your definition.
You have to understand that among the real Jews can't be the alcoholics.
We drink wine 4000 years, and during that time all alcoholics have long gone extinct according the Darwin theory.
"Fake Jews", that is not "real Jews", are any Jews who are alcoholic and not extinct, according to your definition.
 
These are strange sources of inspiration as regards modern political projects.

Nothing strange.
The idea to be the person of all 4 world Cultures I took from Kublai Khan - the greatest world ruler of all Asia and almost all Europe for about 40 years.
According Marco Polo he was Buddhist and Christian (his mother was christian) and he had many muslims that assisted in important deals.
It means that he knew Koran too.
If the top world ruler is 4-cultural it means that his nephews - the rulers of almost all nations of Asia and Europe have to be 4-cultural.
But it was not so.
His nephews were or christians, or buddhists, or muslims as their nations.
And it is the main reason why his greatest empire in the world history was destroyed after his death.
The idea 4-cultural education for everybody I took from Kublai Khan experience.
How nice! Does that mean that my observations about nationality and language are untrue? You appear to be one of the few remaining British Israelites, and if so, you should consult a doctor at once!
Remind me what observations you mean.
Proponents of British Israelism claim numerous links in historical linguistics between ancient Hebrew and various European place names and languages. As an example; proponents claim that 'British' is derived from the Hebrew words 'Berit' and 'Ish', and should therefore be understood as 'Covenant Man'. These words have other roots and this interpretation of the Hebrew is incorrect.
"Britain" - means "Union".
It is from Holy Language word
ברית
"Brit", that means "union".
So "Britain" is synonymous of the word "Union".
So we can use in English those 2 words with the same sense.

"Alliance" the synonym of those words too.
 
Definitely another vodka soaked breakfast occurring again here.

I've understood none of today's gibberish.

ETA: I'm British and live in this Great Britain of which you speak, is a robot judge going to wave a sharp instrument near my boy-bits in this Utopia? Cos if so I'll short circuit him by pouring vodka mixed with filtered water in his eyes.

You have to understand that there are many great meaning-units in this thread.
Please don't mix them and most of them will be clear you.
 
Beer in Europe is probably much older than that

Beer may have been known in Neolithic Europe as far back as 5,000 years ago, and was mainly brewed on a domestic scale.

You have just given it a resounding accolade! According to you, wine drinkers are not alcoholics because the consumption of wine kills off so many of those who drink it, that the wine drinking populations' gene pool now contains only those individuals who have a special immunity to the fatal effects of that fluid.

That sort of beverage is not attractive to me. You should therefore drink beer, and then you would continue to exist, and pass on all manner of genetic material to the next generation. In this way great numbers of alcoholics at least manage to remain alive, even if they may be disadvantaged in other respects.

We here in Scotland are living (I will not say "walking") proof of the truth of what I say.

If you can't live without beer you are beer-alcoholic.
If you can't live without wine you are wine-alcoholic.
If you can't live without vodka you are vodka-alcoholic.
It is the statistical that the separate nations who drink wine thousands years - Jews, Armenians, Georgians have very little percentage of alcoholics.
This fact can be explained very good using the Darwin theory.
 
Really, that's not a serious objection. Languages simply borrow or invent new words as they come to require them. The English word "quark" originated as a nonsense word in a literary work, chosen because it was associated with "three", and these particles group in threes.

Or it is the German word for a kind of cream cheese.

But Hebrew speakers are as much entitled to borrow that word, or invent their own, as speakers of any other tongue.

GOD RESURRECTED LANGUAGE TO EVERY GOD BELIEVER!
 
Nothing strange.
The idea to be the person of all 4 world Cultures I took from Kublai Khan - the greatest world ruler of all Asia and almost all Europe for about 40 years.
You want your Americo-Israeli empire to resemble the Mongolian occupation of China? Dear Heaven, that's the best yet!
"Britain" - means "Union".
It is from Holy Language word
ברית
"Brit", that means "union".
So "Britain" is synonymous of the word "Union".
So we can use in English those 2 words with the same sense.

"Alliance" the synonym of those words too.
I have quoted
As an example; proponents claim that 'British' is derived from the Hebrew words 'Berit' and 'Ish', and should therefore be understood as 'Covenant Man'. These words have other roots and this interpretation of the Hebrew is incorrect.​
Yes, the words "alliance" and "covenant" in this context mean the same thing. In French, the word "alliance" is used to translate the Biblical expression. Genesis 15:18

In the same day the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates
En ce jour-là, l’Eternel fit alliance avec Abram, et dit: Je donne ce pays à ta postérité, depuis le fleuve d’Egypte jusqu’au grand fleuve, au fleuve d’Euphrate​

However, the notion that "Brit" of "Britain" is from the Holy Language word ברית is utter nonsense. As I have stated, this was a feature of the ludicrous insanity regurgitated by the British Israelites.
 
You are welcome. In my "To eat only on days with a y in them lifestyle", however, the pigs must read from all four of the world's greatest bacon cookery books each day and wear paper hats.

Here you want to say that reading the Tanah, the Tripitaka, Bible, and Qur'an is the teaching for pigs, but not to the people.
 
Your error on this point has been explained to you. Your body does not produce alkaloids or opiates. Why do you persist when you now know you are wrong?

And why I am in a light pleasant creative drunk euphoria 6 days a week without alcohol and drugs!?
Everybody who will not eat more than 12 hours will feel this effect "to be drunk without drinking vodka".
 
And why I am in a light pleasant creative drunk euphoria 6 days a week without alcohol and drugs!?
Alcohol and drugs are poisons which cause your brain to malfunction. The fact that the symptoms of this malfunctioning feel pleasant does not make them a good thing. If you're getting similar symptoms to those produced by alcohol then your brain is malfunctioning, probably because it's not getting the nutrients it needs to function correctly.

Everybody who will not eat more than 12 hours will feel this effect "to be drunk without drinking vodka".
I usually eat my last meal at 5 pm and my first meal at 8 am, so I don't eat for 15 hours almost every day. I do not feel this effect.
 
Quoting me so completely out of context is nothing short of a lie.

You have to understand that 99.99999....% of so called winners in the end of their life or after their death became losers.
Only the authors of scientific discoveries are winners for ever but I am not sure that in every case.
Newton - Einstein classic example.

Our criminal society pays $ 10000000 a year to a football player and only $ 1000000 to Nobel prize winner for his new scientific law discovery once in his life.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom