• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Lord Language Resurrection.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let me be frank.

I find the promotion of Hebrew language as a global language nonsense simply because hebrew is not equipped to deal with the modern world. Please provide the Hebrew word for Quark.


I find the promotion of the religiosity of the multitudinous religious texts to be harmful, because not only do they not agree with each other, they all bring harm to people.
Just because we can't find even 100 people in all the world who have read those 4 Books of Books.
I think that I am not only the single man in the world that lives in "To eat only in the 7th Day lifestyle" but I am also a single man in the world that have read 4 Books of Books of all 4 World Religious.
I object to the really bovine claims of internal chemistry creating alcohol and opiates when this is clearly a lie.
Try just the 2nd step of my lifestyle and it will be clear you that it is truth.
I object to the promotion of vodka and alcoholism as a good thing.
I don't make the promotion of vodka and alcoholism as a good thing.
I make the promotion of alkaloids and opiates that will produce your own body when you will live in one of the 7 steps of my lifestyle.
 
Let me be frank.

I find the promotion of Hebrew language as a global language nonsense simply because hebrew is not equipped to deal with the modern world. Please provide the Hebrew word for Quark.
Really, that's not a serious objection. Languages simply borrow or invent new words as they come to require them. The English word "quark" originated as a nonsense word in a literary work, chosen because it was associated with "three", and these particles group in threes.

Or it is the German word for a kind of cream cheese.

But Hebrew speakers are as much entitled to borrow that word, or invent their own, as speakers of any other tongue.
 
I object to the weird health claims which, were one to follow them, would wreck your health.
They will enhance your health.
I object to the proposition that internal fauna can act as a substitute for protein.
But it is really so.
You are object the laws of nature.
Ack. I could go on, but the entire notion is a great steaming pile of welll...***
Rudeness
To me, the OP is irrelevant. Far more important is that no suckers are allowed to give it the idea a moments credence
Their problems that they believe to bad ideas and not believe to my great project.
 
I'm happy to be included in Mr Slipper's little farm, as long as I can be a pig.


You are welcome. In my "To eat only on days with a y in them lifestyle", however, the pigs must read from all four of the world's greatest bacon cookery books each day and wear paper hats.
 
Just because we can't find even 100 people in all the world who have read those 4 Books of Books.
I think that I am not only the single man in the world that lives in "To eat only in the 7th Day lifestyle" but I am also a single man in the world that have read 4 Books of Books of all 4 World Religious.

Try just the 2nd step of my lifestyle and it will be clear you that it is truth.

I don't make the promotion of vodka and alcoholism as a good thing.
I make the promotion of alkaloids and opiates that will produce your own body when you will live in one of the 7 steps of my lifestyle.

Your error on this point has been explained to you. Your body does not produce alkaloids or opiates. Why do you persist when you now know you are wrong?
 
You won't fail
You are right.
I never lose because I never play your social games.
The game that I give to all people when they will implement my projects is the "win - win" game.
It is not your global "0.0000001% winners and 99.999999 losers" game.
So I have 0 chances to loose the game and relatively much more big chance to win the game.
 
Stay on topic please, what about the bankers and LEOs I was talking about.
Besides which I would not call reading a speech which some one else has written highly skilled.

About Bank employees, and especially the top managers my opinions are correct.
About the owners of the banks, they strive to make the most profit as possible, and therefore the purchasing power of U.S. citizens for example at the level of the 1970's.
Only the implementation of my Global Project can take world from negative Area when the total criminal structures have the total global power to the positive Area with zero corruption.
 
You are right.
I never lose because I never play your social games.
The game that I give to all people when they will implement my projects is the "win - win" game.
It is not your global "0.0000001% winners and 99.999999 losers" game.
So I have 0 chances to loose the game and relatively much more big chance to win the game.

Quoting me so completely out of context is nothing short of a lie.
 
Last edited:
About Bank employees, and especially the top managers my opinions are correct.
About the owners of the banks, they strive to make the most profit as possible, and therefore the purchasing power of U.S. citizens for example at the level of the 1970's.
Only the implementation of my Global Project can take world from negative Area when the total criminal structures have the total global power to the positive Area with zero corruption.

That made no sense at all. It looks like google translate is not only altering the language your answers are written in, but it is also removing all parts of the answer that make it coherent.
 
John Edgar Hoover was the director of FBI from 1924 till 1972.
His main method to have the kompromat oppose all criminal elite of USA and by using this weapon to regulate the life in USA.
After him all others USA presidents use the same method but with modern communication technologies.
Only "Lottocracy" can change our false democracy of criminals in the state power for the last 100 years not only ib USA but in all developed and developing countries.

I'm afraid you'll have to run that through another translation machine, maybe a couple more times, in order to raise it to the level of mere gibberish.
 
I'm afraid you'll have to run that through another translation machine, maybe a couple more times, in order to raise it to the level of mere gibberish.
I can tease out the last sentence. "Lottocracy" refers to the practice of drawing lots rather than holding elections to choose candidates for office. NC has referred to this before. It's more commonly known as "sortition" and was practiced, for certain offices of state, by the ancient Athenians.

NC envisages a rather horrible world order. A kind of American-Israeli Empire of "correctly-developing" states centred in Jerusalem, with Hebrew as a compulsory language, and with rulers chosen by lot from a favoured group or political caste.

The state cult would be a syncretic mishmash of the Abrahamic religions, with an added dash of Buddhism. Its religious centre would consist of a Zeppelin-like dirigible gas-filled balloon in the shape of a three-dimensional Star of David, which would contain a Temple, and hover above various constituent cities of the envisaged empire. What manner of religious activities would be practiced there, we have not yet been told.
 
I can tease out the last sentence. "Lottocracy" refers to the practice of drawing lots rather than holding elections to choose candidates for office. NC has referred to this before. It's more commonly known as "sortition" and was practiced, for certain offices of state, by the ancient Athenians.

NC envisages a rather horrible world order. A kind of American-Israeli Empire of "correctly-developing" states centred in Jerusalem, with Hebrew as a compulsory language, and with rulers chosen by lot from a favoured group or political caste.

The state cult would be a syncretic mishmash of the Abrahamic religions, with an added dash of Buddhism. Its religious centre would consist of a Zeppelin-like dirigible gas-filled balloon in the shape of a three-dimensional Star of David, which would contain a Temple, and hover above various constituent cities of the envisaged empire. What manner of religious activities would be practiced there, we have not yet been told.

Cosmo has a fixation with lotteries, Maybe an as of yet revealed gambling addiction.

I propose a lottery to decide what day the lottery is drawn.
 
Cosmo has a fixation with lotteries, Maybe an as of yet revealed gambling addiction.

I propose a lottery to decide what day the lottery is drawn.
In certain religious traditions, most emphatically including the primitive Israelite cult of YHWH from which Judaism later evolved, the outcome of sortition was regarded as an expression of the will of supernatural beings, and was therefore treated with veneration. Elected office bearers are obviously chosen by people; but ones selected by lot are thought to be chosen by the god, and that is more impressive to the primitive mind. Primitive minds think that everything is determined by the decision of intelligent beings, either human, or supernatural.

... (T)he practice of lots was used frequently in ancient Israel.
The primary reason for casting lots was to render an impartial, unbiased decision on important matters. Once they were cast, no one could argue that the decision was the result of human intervention like nepotism, politics, favoritism, and so on. This practice would be the same as throwing dice or flipping a coin we commonly use today. In ancient times, they used varying means to cast lots, depending on the place and local customs, such as coins, polished sticks, cards, dice, and so on.

What is particularly significant is the fact that, in ancient Israel, the High Priest did use from time to time the tradition of casting lots for important, uncertain decisions. It amounted to consulting God for the answer, as Proverbs states "The lot is cast into the lap, but its every decision is from the Lord" (Proverbs 16:33).​
http://www.biblestudy.org/question/what-is-casting-lots.html

Later religions, including of course later Judaism, evolved beyond that, and are more content with election as an expression of rational thought. But NC has reverted to proto-historic primitivism.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom