Mez pricked numerous times by the point of a knife.
Apart from the starch.
Can anyone prove Meredith's DNA was ever on the knife?
Was the murder weapon ever found? (The knife that matches the wounds)
Both are established facts. As well you know.
Precedent and case law. CPP Art 628 para 2. Penal code.
Mez pricked numerous times by the point of a knife.
I sent a letter to Rudy Guede in prison and he sent me a long reply confessing he did it on his own and describing details that only the real murderer would know. I'm going to post this letter, written by his own hand very soon.
No - Raffaele was responding to being told that Kercher's DNA had shown up on the knife. It had nothing to do with anything else. Just that.
Hmm? They never had that knowledge.
Raff wrote, "When cooking with Mez I accidentally pricked the back of Mez' hand with my knife".
No - Raffaele was responding to being told that Kercher's DNA had shown up on the knife. It had nothing to do with anything else. Just that.
No he was not. It was a note he wrote in his diary, knowing the police were bound to read it.
He did not have access to Lalli's autopsy report, so must have known first hand.
Where does he say "numerous times" like you claimed?
The autopsy report IIRC states there were 147 injuries on Mez' body, 3 deepcstb woundd in neck, 23 nicks and slashes, bruises and shoulder displacement from her arms wrenched backwards rendering loss of use in one arm.
Wrong. Conti and Vecchiotti's report was still valid evidence in the Nencini trial, and shows that the victim's DNA could not be reliably proved to be on the blade. Not only that, but the Rome lab that made the additional test for the Nencini trial explicitly stated that it could not be concluded that the victim's DNA was on the blade on the basis of Stefanoni's uncorroborated single test result.
Not only that, but even if Stefanoni's result was genuine, how does a speck of the victim's DNA prove this is the murder weapon?
Not only that, but even if it was the murder weapon, how does Amanda's DNA on the handle prove that she was the killer?
You (and Nencini) have to overcome 3 levels of proof here - you do not achieve even one level. This (among other nonsense) I think will be central in the Marasca motivation report in quashing the Nencini verdict.
The autopsy report IIRC states there were 147 injuries on Mez' body, 3 deep stab wounds in neck, 23 nicks and slashes, bruises and shoulder displacement from her arms wrenched backwards rendering loss of use in one arm.
Disagree.
Massei and Nencini accepted all the above evidence as proven.
Your saying otherwise does not make it so.
Where did Raffaelle say that she was pricked "numerous times"?
Lalli said that. Raff said he p r i c k e d the back of Mez' hand knowing her DNA would likely be found on his knife, as he did indeed p r i c k Mez hands, chin and neck quite a few times on the night of the murder.
Lalli said that. Raff said he p r i c k e d the back of Mez' hand knowing her DNA would likely be found on his knife, as he did indeed p r i c k Mez hands, chin and neck quite a few times on the night of the murder.
Mez pricked numerous times by the point of a knife.