Kauffer
Master Poster
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2014
- Messages
- 2,382
Amanda was always quick to "drop people in it" IMV. She told police unprompted Laura and Filomena smoked pot, claimed Patrick murdered and raped Mez and volunteered Raff had a past history of "extensive drug use: cocaine and acid", and that "he suffered mental illness via depression".
Amanda to Mignini Mez' body was "covered in vaseline". In her email home, she informs +25 people police asked her whether Mez mentioned "anal sex". In the same email to +25 people Amanda confirms police had asked her to maintain confidentiality.
Maybe Mez did once ask for one of Amanda's condoms. Amanda telling all who will listen about this (one?) incident seems to me a self-serving attempt to depict Mez as some kind of a hypocrite for daring to object to Amanda bringing a string of strange men to the cottage. Rudy claimed Mez called Amanda, "a drugged up tart".
Of course, Amanda is free to be as promiscuous as she likes. However, it can be fairly argued she put her roommates - especially home-alone Mez - in a vulnerable position.
You think Amanda's coerced statements to the police were "unprompted"? Not on this planet.
Guede is your source for what Kercher said about Amanda? That's reliable! According to Guede, Kercher had a date that night with him. What exactly is the problem with Amanda inviting friends to her home? They weren't strange to her and nobody complained. How were her roommates made vulnerable? And why do you describe Kercher as "home-alone"? This is a wilful misrepresentation - as if strangers simply showed up at the apartment at Amanda's behest and Kercher never went out. Fantasy.
One of your greatest problems is a skewed perspective - another is that you make stuff up. Amanda privately revealing that Kercher borrowed condoms from her is not 'telling all who would listen". You only know about it because Amanda's communications were made public. And it can hardly be payback for Kercher objecting to her bringing friends to the apartment, because Kercher did not object. There is no evidence for it.