I had a thought that the thread might focus on the single issue of the bleach receipts for a bit.
Vixen seems to be under the impression that receipts exist showing the purchase of bleach by Sollecito and/or Knox sometime within a day or so of Kercher's murder. He/She seems to base this on Richard Owen's reporting.
The claim has been made by several people is that no such receipts were found by the police. This claim is based on:
1. Photographs of the actual receipts found by the police. Link:
http://www.injusticeinperugia.org/receipts.html
2.The fact that receipts for the purchase of bleach would have been significant as evidenced by the fact that the prosecution put on the stand a witness to testify to the purchase of bleach who was not credible.
3. The fact that the receipts were not put into evidence in the trial despite the clear importance that the prosecution put on the idea that AK/RS had purchased bleach following the murder.
4. Information from an Italian news source, la repubblica, quoted by Methos:
English translation
link to post:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=10667540#post10667540
Some of these claims are easily falsifiable if evidence to their false nature exists. Among the possibilities Vixen could point to places in the court record where information about the bleach receipts was entered as evidence, photographs of the receipts showing the purchase of the bleach on the dates in question, and any current articles by a reputable journalist claiming that the early stories about the bleach receipts were true.
I do not believe that this thread should move on until Vixen responds to the evidence that has been put forth on this issue. The thread bounces around all over the place without a resolution on any issue. This is an opportunity to change this. Vixen seems to believe he/she is correct on this issue. Let's give Vixen a chance to do some research and produce the evidence he/she believes is compelling on this point.[/QUOTE
I agree.