• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Continuation Part 15: Amanda Knox/Raffaele Sollecito

Status
Not open for further replies.
I am envisioning more of a jeweler's hammer, which I have seen in burglar's kits as I've studied the topic. But, regardless, to use any hammer whatsoever for either the attorney's office or the Kercher/Knox cottage would have been completely impractical, as it would have required Guede to have leapt up and hung by the windowsill with one hand while chipping into the glass with the other. In both cases, a rock was a much more practical solution, both for the purposes of the noise test, the physics of breaking the old & thick glass at the cottage, and to minimize the gymnastics involved to gain entry.


I was under the impression that Guede was carrying a type of emergency hammer, as can be found on most trains and buses. They often look like this:




They are specifically designed to break tempered glass, as used in bus and train windows, and they can also be more effective than ordinary hammers in breaking double-glazed windows. Maybe Guede got hold of (i.e. stole) it from the train he took to Milan
 
Saw this event listed for June 18 in London. Wondering if any of our UK based posters might attend?

http://www.city.ac.uk/events/2015/j...media-and-the-italian-criminal-justice-system

Wonder if any UK based guilters will show up to explain their views?

(is it wrong to wish we could bus in a load of guilters, and televise this event? - '“Foxy Knoxy”: the fabrication of a killer celebrity identity' - can you just imagine that scene???).



I will certainly try to make it. It might be a little over-academic, but I still think it would be very interesting - and, as some know, I've long held an interest in these sorts of aspects of this case.
 
They are specifically designed to break tempered glass, as used in bus and train windows, and they can also be more effective than ordinary hammers in breaking double-glazed windows. Maybe Guede got hold of (i.e. stole) it from the train he took to Milan

:D
 
I fully agree with you. Avv Bongiornio stringing out the trial to stall time for Raf on the convenient excuse of expecting a baby was contempt, IYO.

You have it wrong, Bongiornio was not pregnant at the time of the first trial and when she missed a few of the trial dates in the first trial it was due to her parliamentary duties. The trial continued without her on those occasions.
 
CT should have been able to positively ID Rudi if you believe his whole story but he couldn't. I don't see why his lackings aren't as significant as Curatolo's regardless of the greater impact of Curatolo on the kids' trial.

Anyone can say in hindsight, oh yeah, that guy who mugged me was Gary Glitter, I recognised him in later newspaper reports. Do you see the procedural problems? Courts rely on chronology. The correct sequence should be, 1. was mugged, 2, reported it to the police, 3, picked out guy on ID parade, 4, suspect interviewed under caution, 5, file sent to Crown Prosecution Service to determine if charges should be brought.
 
Anyone can say in hindsight, oh yeah, that guy who mugged me was Gary Glitter, I recognised him in later newspaper reports. Do you see the procedural problems? Courts rely on chronology. The correct sequence should be, 1. was mugged, 2, reported it to the police, 3, picked out guy on ID parade, 4, suspect interviewed under caution, 5, file sent to Crown Prosecution Service to determine if charges should be brought.

What is amazing is that you do not apply this to the Perugian murder case from 2007.
 
he is getting something for some of them. Why he kept the rest, who knows.

The thing is that we are trying to only come up with what he was probably doing. No matter what, his DNA was all over her, his hand prints were in her blood, his shoe prints were in her blood, and he money was missing. Edit: He also fled the country immediately.

As such, we could be completely wrong about why he was there and he would still be guilty of murder. There is no real evidence of anybody else so his strange tales are not credible in any manner.

Part of the reason why I speculate about what exactly he was ding is to determine the risk he poses once released.


Rudy told Giacomo Benedetti on Sype the window was not broken as of the time he left. Putting aside the fact he is a consumate liar, why would come up with this strange fact?
 
To obtain a reasonable sample of DNA, you need one transferred by saliva, perspiration, living cells rather than dead ones, or blood, i.e., newly wet.

Merely sweeping up specks of dust is wasting everybody's time. DNA is a helix shaped structure which is also very fragile once shed. Your aim would be to be able to identify allelles, haplotypes and mitchochrondrial Dna (the matrilineal line [ethnicity] and chromosomes, Y or X.

So, might I ask how Lukis Anderson's DNA ended up under the fingernails of murder victim Raveesh "Ravi" Kumra? Must have a really good answer?
 
Anyone can say in hindsight, oh yeah, that guy who mugged me was Gary Glitter, I recognised him in later newspaper reports. Do you see the procedural problems? Courts rely on chronology. The correct sequence should be, 1. was mugged, 2, reported it to the police, 3, picked out guy on ID parade, 4, suspect interviewed under caution, 5, file sent to Crown Prosecution Service to determine if charges should be brought.

You do understand that no witness credibly saw them at any time between 8:45 pm and 1 pm the next day. Curatolo when asked the next day didn't remember anything notable nor did Quintavalle tell the detective the same week he had seen Amanda even though he was shown pictures of her.

I don't think CT's testimony should have had weight if considered at all. But then I try to be consistent.
 
Rudy told Giacomo Benedetti on Sype the window was not broken as of the time he left. Putting aside the fact he is a consumate liar, why would come up with this strange fact?

It was in the news. If he did break in, then he would deny it was broken when he left. No mystery.

I hear your now going after the WM3.
 
Rudy told Giacomo Benedetti on Sype the window was not broken as of the time he left. Putting aside the fact he is a consumate liar, why would come up with this strange fact?

What matters in an absolute sense is that his palm print is in blood at the scene, his shoe prints in blood are at the scene, his dna is on the victim in multiple places, her money and cell phones are missing, and his story is implausible to the extreme. That he fled instead of calling for help just makes it more damning.
 
What are you suggesting? That Marasca might change his mind and convict them?? Of course Nencini and Massei are history!

We do not know that the facts found by Massei will be binned. Facts are facts, after all. I am not aware of any new facts presented that overrode facts found at the First Instance merits hearing made the convictions unsafe enough to say, "exonerated". For example, the "real murderers were found".
 
Last edited:
We do not know that the facts found by Massei will be binned. Facts are facts, after all. I am not aware of an new facts presented that overrode facts found at the First Instance merits hearing made the convictions unsafe enough to say, "exonerated". For example, the "real murderers were found".

Er Rudi is found.
 
I believe that forensic police planted his DNA to frame him.
They had just lost their best evidence in the shoe rings and needed something else that could be used against him.
Remember they went back looking for his DNA 43 days later.
It was miracle that they found exactly what they were looking for after the films shows them wiping their dirty gloves on the bra clasp.

The trainer prints were originally considered to be Raf's as they had a unique deformed star pattern on the heel, which matched the print on the floor. Massei bent over backwards for Raf's dad and upheld it was after all, Rudy's print because of the matching box in his room. The addidas print is completely different to Raf's Nike 2 Outbreaks (?). So what was Massei thinking, anyway?

Especially as Raf had immediately soaked his Nikes in bleach after the murder and police recorded witnessing a strong smell of bleach at his abode even five days later.

Did Italian cops try to frame Italian Raf, whose sister was a carabinieri policewoman - one of their own.

Please explain why and how police framed Raf.
 
We do not know that the facts found by Massei will be binned. Facts are facts, after all. I am not aware of an new facts presented that overrode facts found at the First Instance merits hearing made the convictions unsafe enough to say, "exonerated". For example, the "real murderers were found".

Here you were a minute ago saying the absolute opposite of the Hellmann process, that it was history.

Now you are claiming that there might still be some of Nencini or Massei reinstated - all that, after the ISC said the kids were exonerated on Mar 27, 2015?

I stand by my words to you upthread.
 
Filomena's bedroom was dark when Rudi climbed in her window. I suspect he passed through in the dark (without seeing anything) and immediately went into the living area to get an idea of the apartment's layout and see where the front door is. He most probably intended to return to Filomena's bedroom to look for valuables, but first hit the refrigerator before rifling through the bedrooms. He assumed he had plenty of time. Big mistake. After the murder, Rudi was in flight mode.

Are there indications that he went back into Filomena's room after the murder?

His footprints were covered in blood and there was no trace at all of Rudy in Filomena's room, despite Rudy's profligracy in scattering his ID.
 
The trainer prints were originally considered to be Raf's as they had a unique deformed star pattern on the heel, which matched the print on the floor. Massei bent over backwards for Raf's dad and upheld it was after all, Rudy's print because of the matching box in his room. The addidas print is completely different to Raf's Nike 2 Outbreaks (?). So what was Massei thinking, anyway?

Especially as Raf had immediately soaked his Nikes in bleach after the murder and police recorded witnessing a strong smell of bleach at his abode even five days later.

Did Italian cops try to frame Italian Raf, whose sister was a carabinieri policewoman - one of their own.

Please explain why and how police framed Raf.

You print crap like that, with no evidence to support it, and you then want to know how Raffaele was framed? You're doing a fairly good job yourself in this very thread!
 
His footprints were covered in blood and there was no trace at all of Rudy in Filomena's room, despite Rudy's profligracy in scattering his ID.

What is amazing is that you'd speak up for Rudy on that point, while vilifying AK and RS who have no trace of them in the murder room.

That's the trouble with suspect-centric posts like yours.
 
What facts did Curatolo provide?

Since he was last heard by Hellmann, is Hellmann's opinion the relevant one?

Hellmann's report is as dead as a dodo, extinguished, rescinded, mullahed, massacred, repudiated, reversed, removed, blotted out, cut into pieces, trampled over, ditched, scrubbed, dashed.

Please note.


Toto was an eye witness.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom