Ed clintonemails.com: Who is Eric Hoteham?

[Marcus]

I don't believe there is one "Hillary apologist" contributing to this thread. There are a lot of people who are questioning the validity of the claims, questioning the "evidence" being provided, and questioning the value of the inquisition. People shouldn't confuse genuine skepticism with being an apologist.

I would rather see skepticism applied to both sides of the issue, rather than solely to Hillarys critics. I may not subscribe to the "Hillary is evil incarnate" meme but I still find some of her actions questionable.

 

[DavidJames]

I would rather see skepticism applied to both sides of the issue, rather than solely to Hillarys critics. I may not subscribe to the "Hillary is evil incarnate" meme but I still find some of her actions questionable.

I also find them questionable as I think do most in this thread.

 

[Marcus]

Whelp... now we know that her excuse of only wanting to have one email address is a lie...

One claim of hers in particular I'm very skeptical of, her contention that the private server was merely a matter of convenience, nothing to do with subpoenas or foi requests.

 

[The Big Dog]

Whelp... now we know that her excuse of only wanting to have one email address is a lie...

just ran a test on her alleged glitch.

The email addresses in the body of nested emails do not change even after being transferred to another system.

She used two? Not surprised.

 

[jhunter1163]

I also find them questionable as I think do most in this thread.

Questionable, yes. Illegal, probably no. Disqualifying her from the Presidency, definitely no.

 

[TheL8Elvis]

State Department plans on turning over Hillary emails in 2016.

So that just happened.

Thanks Hillary.

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/...ls-release-schedule-118085.html#ixzz3abAjuPAP

A federal judge has rejected the State Department’s plan to release most of Hillary Clinton’s emails as secretary of state in one large batch, insisting that the agency parcel out releases of the records over time.

So that just happened.

Thanks Judge.

 

[The Big Dog]

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/...ls-release-schedule-118085.html#ixzz3abAjuPAP

A federal judge has rejected the State Department’s plan to release most of Hillary Clinton’s emails as secretary of state in one large batch, insisting that the agency parcel out releases of the records over time.

So that just happened.

Thanks Judge.

Indeed! Thanks Judge!

 

[TheL8Elvis]

Whelp... now we know that her excuse of only wanting to have one email address is a lie...

I believe the claim was to carry one device, not to have one email address.

One claim of hers in particular I'm very skeptical of, her contention that the private server was merely a matter of convenience, nothing to do with subpoenas or foi requests.

Indeed. Many posters in the thread have agreed that it seems likely the ultimate reason was along the lines of being able to control her email.

 

[Newtons Bit]

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/...ls-release-schedule-118085.html#ixzz3abAjuPAP

A federal judge has rejected the State Department’s plan to release most of Hillary Clinton’s emails as secretary of state in one large batch, insisting that the agency parcel out releases of the records over time.

So that just happened.

Thanks Judge.

I think the wording on that is wrong. The judge is ordering the emails to be released as they're been reviewed (in batches every 2 months), rather than waiting until 2016 to release them all at the same time (or run into a new 'problem' in 2016 and announce they still can't release them because 'reasons').

 

[TheL8Elvis]

I think the wording on that is wrong.

How so ?

The judge is ordering the emails to be released as they're been reviewed (in batches every 2 months),

A federal judge ...insisting that the agency parcel out releases of the records over time.

rather than waiting until 2016 to release them all at the same time

A federal judge has rejected ... plan to release ... in one large batch

 

[TheL8Elvis]

just ran a test on her alleged glitch.

The email addresses in the body of nested emails do not change even after being transferred to another system.
She used two? Not surprised.

And you did not notice that the "email addresses in the body of nested emails" were all HDR22 ?

You just validated kendalls explanation:

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2015/05/19/clintons-second-email-address-was-explained-mon/203696

The old "HDR22" address still appears in some of the documents the Times highlighted, but seems to only occur in the text of the body of emails that were replies or forwards from other individuals. For example, a printed email from Clinton aide Jake Sullivan which was published by the Times still shows "HDR22" in the text of his email, because he was replying to her original message.

 

[Newtons Bit]

How so ?



A federal judge ...insisting that the agency parcel out releases of the records over time.



A federal judge has rejected ... plan to release ... in one large batch

"parcel out releases over time" implies that the judge wanted to slow down the release, versus releasing them as they're ready (which is what the judge is ordering). Or at least that's how it came across to me when I first read it.

 

[TheL8Elvis]

"parcel out releases over time" implies that the judge wanted to slow down the release, versus releasing them as they're ready (which is what the judge is ordering). Or at least that's how it came across to me when I first read it.

Oh. I thought it pretty clearly meant release them in parcels as ready, as opposed to waiting until they are all completed.

Either way, it's clear what is to happen.

 

[TheL8Elvis]

And you did not notice that the "email addresses in the body of nested emails" were all HDR22 ?

You just validated kendalls explanation:

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2015/05/19/clintons-second-email-address-was-explained-mon/203696

The old "HDR22" address still appears in some of the documents the Times highlighted, but seems to only occur in the text of the body of emails that were replies or forwards from other individuals. For example, a printed email from Clinton aide Jake Sullivan which was published by the Times still shows "HDR22" in the text of his email, because he was replying to her original message.

And another few hundred pages of email that also confirm the above:

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/05/22/us/politics/document-emails.html?_r=0

 

[TheL8Elvis]

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/22/u...n-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=1

WASHINGTON — The State Department is expected to release the first batch of emails from Hillary Rodham Clinton’s private email address in the coming days.
...
The Times obtained about a third of the 850 pages of emails. They appear to back up Mrs. Clinton’s previous assertions that she did not receive classified information at her private email address.

 

[The Big Dog]

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/22/u...n-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=1

WASHINGTON — The State Department is expected to release the first batch of emails from Hillary Rodham Clinton’s private email address in the coming days.
...
The Times obtained about a third of the 850 pages of emails. They appear to back up Mrs. Clinton’s previous assertions that she did not receive classified information at her private email address.

But some of the emails contain what the government calls “sensitive” information or “SBU’’ — sensitive but unclassified. This includes details of the whereabouts of State Department officials in Libya when security there was deteriorating during the 2011 revolution. One email from a year and a half before the attacks that was marked sensitive but unclassified contained the whereabouts of Mr. Stevens as he considered leaving Benghazi during the uprising against the Qaddafi regime because of the deteriorating security.

 

[TheL8Elvis]

As avid readers of this thread know, the Select Committee to Investigate the Benghazi Attacks had requested that Clinton sit for two sessions, one devoted to the emails destruction and one related to the attacks and follow up.

Clinton has refused to sit for two sessions, apparently deciding to try to run out the clock on both investigations

The letter from Hillary's lawyer was released by her chief lap dog in the House, Elijah Cummings.

And Hillary said she was going to cooperate.

So is that hearing during the week of the 18th today or tomorrow ?

 

[TheL8Elvis]

But some of the emails contain what the government calls “sensitive” information or “SBU’’ — sensitive but unclassified. This includes details of the whereabouts of State Department officials in Libya when security there was deteriorating during the 2011 revolution. One email from a year and a half before the attacks that was marked sensitive but unclassified contained the whereabouts of Mr. Stevens as he considered leaving Benghazi during the uprising against the Qaddafi regime because of the deteriorating security.

And this matters ... why ?

If it's unclassified, it's ok (by definition) to send over email, right ?

 

[The Big Dog]

And this matters ... why ?

If it's unclassified, it's ok (by definition) to send over email, right ?

No.

God damn, Obama said no to her hiring Sid Blumenthal so he sends her dozens of email reports that she turns around and circulates to the State Department.

Wowsers.

 

[TheL8Elvis]

No.

Actually, yes.

God damn, Obama said no to her hiring Sid Blumenthal so he sends her dozens of email reports that she turns around and circulates to the State Department.

Wowsers.

And this matters ... why ?