HSienzant
Philosopher
When do you intend to start pointing out those flaws?
Nothing you've mentioned to date is a flaw in the official account.
It's a flaw in your knowledge of the evidence.
Hank
Moderated JFK conspiracy theories: it never ends III
- Thread starter HSienzant
- Start date
- Status
When do you intend to start pointing out those flaws?
Nothing you've mentioned to date is a flaw in the official account.
It's a flaw in your knowledge of the evidence.
Hank
theprestige
Penultimate Amazing
If she was not reliably Quaker in her attitudes, then we cannot rely on her Quaker attitudes as evidence that she must have done something reliably Quaker.
Also, I once had a roommate who smoked a lot of marijuana. Our other roommate, whose name was on the lease and who was subletting to us, did not want marijuana in the apartment. Despite this prohibition, and despite the risk of being discovered and evicted, my roommate was able to bring marijuana into the apartment on more than one occasion, without being discovered. He had to exercise some caution, of course, but not as much as you might think. Reuniting with our "landlady" a few years later, I got from her the impression that she suspected shenanigans along those lines, but saw no point in causing a scene as long as the offending roommate made an effort to stay off her radar.
So naturally I don't consider your account of Paine's attitudes and policies even remotely meaningful to this discussion.
RoboTimbo
Hostile Nanobacon
Looks like Jango and Soily have joined the other CTists and run away again rather than answer questions.
LSSBB
Devilish Dictionarian
It's not answering questions that I think anyone is running from. Conceding a point, however...
Hans
Philosopher
- Joined
- May 10, 2007
- Messages
- 9,214
I'm not that familiar with Solly's posting but I think a case could be made to start calling Jango "springheels" to celebrate his ability to escape threads when his latest contribution has crashed like the R-101.
I wrote a review of Craig Roberts' book, Kill Zone at Amazon. It is similar to my post #841. My review is here; http://www.amazon.com/Kill-Zone-Sni...UTF8&showViewpoints=1&sortBy=byRankDescending
It is listed as the most helpful critical review. I don't think it is going to sway anyone who is unwilling to look past the errors in the book, but I tried.
Ranb
It is listed as the most helpful critical review. I don't think it is going to sway anyone who is unwilling to look past the errors in the book, but I tried.
Ranb
BStrong
Penultimate Amazing
I wrote a review of Craig Roberts' book, Kill Zone at Amazon. It is similar to my post #841. My review is here; http://www.amazon.com/Kill-Zone-Sni...UTF8&showViewpoints=1&sortBy=byRankDescending
It is listed as the most helpful critical review. I don't think it is going to sway anyone who is unwilling to look past the errors in the book, but I tried.
Ranb
Excellent work Salud!
RoboTimbo
Hostile Nanobacon
I wrote a review of Craig Roberts' book, Kill Zone at Amazon. It is similar to my post #841. My review is here; http://www.amazon.com/Kill-Zone-Sni...UTF8&showViewpoints=1&sortBy=byRankDescending
It is listed as the most helpful critical review. I don't think it is going to sway anyone who is unwilling to look past the errors in the book, but I tried.
Ranb
Nice work. I marked it as helpful.
Allen773
Graduate Poster
Long Politico article here. http://www.politico.eu/article/why-the-last-of-the-jfk-files-could-embarrass-the-cia/
Jango
Graduate Poster
Jango
Graduate Poster
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kiSoxFHyjGY
That's a short clip of Dan Rather a few days after the Kennedy assassination.
Are there any inaccuracies with what he said that anyone can point out?
That's a short clip of Dan Rather a few days after the Kennedy assassination.
Are there any inaccuracies with what he said that anyone can point out?
BStrong
Penultimate Amazing
It's Rather's pov - whether he was correct or not is on him.
I'll throw out a simple, plausible explanation.
Rather described what he saw watching the Zapruder film.
He was/is a reporter, not an expert on GSW's or an experienced professional, and was stunned by the footage.
His recollection was filtered by his shock and grief.
Oliver Stone allegedly is an experienced combat vet and still asserts that the "back and to the left" motion of JFK's head is evidence for a shooter from the front, so there's available evidence that someone other than Rather observed the Z footage and filtered it through their pov for their own purposes.
BazBear
Possible Suspect
I'm not sure how Stone, after seeing frame 313, could continue to think the fatal shot came from the front.
Regnad Kcin
Penultimate Amazing
"All lies and jest. Still, a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest."
Jango
Graduate Poster
Why, in your opinion, should he not think that?
Jango
Graduate Poster
A member of this board posted this elsewhere:
Anybody care to comment as to why that statement is false?
Anybody care to comment as to why that statement is false?
RoboTimbo
Hostile Nanobacon
Where, in your opinion, did the shots come from?
RoboTimbo
Hostile Nanobacon
Do you care to comment on it?
JayUtah
Penultimate Amazing
Yes, Jango, you seem to be proposing a shot-from-the-front conspiracy theory, but you're doing a very bad job of laying it out coherently. Please give us your analysis of Rather's comments. Or failing that, get to some point.
- Status