Can a CharlieHebdo-type attack happen in the US?

HenryLee

Muse
HenryLee
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Messages
753
Yes, but not today, not in Texas.

So the usual bomb throwers(Pamela Geller, Robert Spencer and Geert Wilders) held a little art exhibit and cartoon contest to "celebrate free speech" and antagonize adherents of the ROP.

So two men, Lutherans presumably, drove up, got out and started shooting. They're dead. Killed by police. A security guard was wounded but has been released from hospital.

Their car is to be detonated by the bomb squad.

http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2015/05/03/breaking-shooting-in-garland/
 
Now that's just damn funny.

Congressmen Keith Ellison and Andre Carson, Quakers both I believe, along with CAIR, lobbied to have Wilders' visa blocked. They know what follows him around.
 
I haven't heard any details about the suspects' backgrounds but I predict they will be the offspring of immigrants, from a middle-class or above upbringing, and college-educated. I also predict that President Obama's comments will be more overtly critical of extremist elements within the religion of Islam instead of just saying that the suspects aren't real Muslims. I also predict that the President will obliquely place some blame on the organizers of the cartoon contest.
 
This was a suicide attack, technically. Texas police is probably better armed than most national armies. It's certainly more willing to shoot to kill than most armies.

McHrozni
 
Perfect outcome. We need more incidents like this to enflame tensions, solidify and renew divisions, and undermine the multicultural "one world, borders are oppressive, man!" project which destroys unique peoples and cultures by inundating them with whoever can breed most irresponsibly.

If Muslims and Africans and Mexicans and whoever else cannot keep their reproduction at sustainable levels, and cannot get their own (considerable) lands and nations in order, the solution is not to let them flood more successful societies with their excess humanity.

There should be about five Muslims per nation in the west, as visiting professors etc.

This idea that everyone has a right to live in the west, and boats full of worthless eaters should be admitted to Italy and the EU generally, and that nations are passé and genetics are interchangeable can have only one result: a barbaric, brown, backward, Muslim planet.

Quite enough of this globe already fits that description.

No people should be forced into a breeding competition or a cultural tug of war within their own borders.
 
Skeptic Tank said:
Perfect outcome. We need more incidents like this to enflame tensions, solidify and renew divisions, and undermine the multicultural "one world, borders are oppressive, man!" project which destroys unique peoples and cultures by inundating them with whoever can breed most irresponsibly.

If Muslims and Africans and Mexicans and whoever else cannot keep their reproduction at sustainable levels, and cannot get their own (considerable) lands and nations in order, the solution is not to let them flood more successful societies with their excess humanity.

There should be about five Muslims per nation in the west, as visiting professors etc.

This idea that everyone has a right to live in the west, and boats full of worthless eaters should be admitted to Italy and the EU generally, and that nations are passé and genetics are interchangeable can have only one result: a barbaric, brown, backward, Muslim planet.

Quite enough of this globe already fits that description.

No people should be forced into a breeding competition or a cultural tug of war within their own borders.
Click to expand...

My avatar is the future.
 
Skeptic Tank said:
This idea that everyone has a right to live in the west, and boats full of worthless eaters should be admitted to Italy and the EU generally, and that nations are passé and genetics are interchangeable can have only one result: a barbaric, brown, backward, Muslim planet.

Quite enough of this globe already fits that description.
Click to expand...

Well I can see why you think backward is bad. I can see why you think barbaric is bad. I'm pretty sure of the reasons why you think Muslim is bad, although I may not agree with why you think this.

You are going to have to explain why you think brown is bad though.
 
Last edited:
332nd said:
My avatar is the future.
Click to expand...

This is the second time you've mentioned your avatar to me but it isn't clear to me what you're getting at.

I can tell it's a child. Care to make your point more clear?

Congratulations on the child regardless.

ETA: the picture isn't great quality and I'm on a very small screen. I'm assuming she(? Looks like a young girl from what I can tell) is a multiracial child? Is that your meaning?
 
Last edited:
I don't wish for more effective terrorists, but wow, this is some serious incompetence.


A drive-by aimed at a security guard? Is this a Snoop Doggy Dogg video from the mid-nineties?

In Texas? Where you can expect an armed response from police?

So, they chose to give their lives for a taking a pot-shot at some underpaid rent-a-cop?

Face it America, Europe's Muslim terrorists are just way better than yours.
 
Last edited:
PursuedByABear said:
Well I can see why you think backward is bad. I can see why you think barbaric is bad. I'm pretty sure of the reasons why you think Muslim is bad, although I may not agree with why you think this.

You are going to have to explain why you think brown is bad though.
Click to expand...

Loss of diversity, for a start.

If whites mix into the pot we lose red hair, blonde hair, green and blue eyes, freckles, etc.

I happen to think many of these traits are beautiful but their uniqueness and rarity globally are enough to justify their preservation.
 
PursuedByABear said:
Well I can see why you think backward is bad. I can see why you think barbaric is bad. I'm pretty sure of the reasons why you think Muslim is bad, although I may not agree with why you think this.

You are going to have to explain why you think brown is bad though.
Click to expand...

I'm puzzled by brown too.

More brown people in the population decreases the need for sunscreen, which in turn is a big win for the environment.
 
Skeptic Tank said:
This is the second time you've mentioned your avatar to me but it isn't clear to me what you're getting at.

I can tell it's a child. Care to make your point more clear?

Congratulations on the child regardless.

ETA: the picture isn't great quality and I'm on a very small screen. I'm assuming she(? Looks like a young girl from what I can tell) is a multiracial child? Is that your meaning?
Click to expand...

He, & yes, the multiracial child of a multiracial child.

Tick, tick, tick.
 
332nd said:
He, & yes, the multiracial child of a multiracial child.

Tick, tick, tick.
Click to expand...

Apologies for the gender misidentification. That was why I initially tried to avoid deducing anything. As I said, dark small picture on tiny phone screen.

I'm happy for you being a grandparent if that's the dynamic. I'm sure the child is lovely.

None of that changes my desire to preserve unique genomes and the delicate traits they hold, especially when I'm part of one of the more delicate and endangered genomes. I assume you've heard about red hair going extinct.

Personally, I like the idea of my grandchildren looking like my grandparents and being able to truly identify with them in old pictures, rather than risk the kind of disconnect and resentment Obama wrote about in his autobiography.

Does that make me evil?

Does "tick tick tick" indicate a gleeful anticipation of white extinction?
 
Last edited:
Skeptic Tank said:
Loss of diversity, for a start.

If whites mix into the pot we lose red hair, blonde hair, green and blue eyes, freckles, etc.

I happen to think many of these traits are beautiful but their uniqueness and rarity globally are enough to justify their preservation.
Click to expand...

I can actually see your point here. But I think a lot of the fear for loss of diversity stems from some debunked news articles from some years ago.

"Redheads and blondes will be non-existent by 2050" and stuff like that.

You still get redheads and blondes in places like Brazil and Israel.
 
Eddie Dane said:
I can actually see your point here. But I think a lot of the fear for loss of diversity stems from some debunked news articles from some years ago.

"Redheads and blondes will be non-existent by 2050" and stuff like that.

You still get redheads and blondes in places like Brazil and Israel.
Click to expand...

These traits exist in a group (whites) with a very low birth rate, a very low total percentage of the global population, and a rapidly dwindling amount of exclusive territory.

These traits aren't always completely wiped out by one instance of mixing, depending on the genetics of the other party, but a second mix or a third pretty reliably wash them away.

Trend is undeniable.

We also only need look at history and the world today, condition of blacks in nonblack nations, etc. to see clear evidence that being a racial minority in a society is an undesirable and precarious position to be in.

Whites should avoid that situation.

Thought experiment: if the population of Ireland all keeled over dead tomorrow and the UN imported an identical number of people from Guatamala or Zaire, would it still be Ireland in any meaningful way?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom