• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Bigfoot follies

Status
Not open for further replies.
I had posted that to cervelo. I asked them if they were going to a certain specific destination which I will not mention in the forum as it is where Cervelo and I were coming from. They knew the destination I referred to as I called it by name to them and they replied "Yes".
Cervelo knew what I was talking about though I did not mention it here for obvious reasons about the location.
Chris B.

Why the secret location? Risking the integrity of a public park? lol.

Naming the place establishes how normal people go there for things like picnics.

it was after sunset and getting dark

I thought so. You changed the story to "black" with me. No scruples.

Think about it, could they have taken
that stroller and dolly over and under those downed trees we encountered and down and back up that hill we trekked?

lol. Getting a stroller over a downed tree? Incredible.

I dragged 77 of them home with me this winter. Maybe I should go out and see if I have the balls to get a baby stroller over one of them.

Really - this is exactly what I mean about 'footers being people who can't and don't do much of anything at all making the most mundane thing sound like such an accomplishment.
 
Last edited:
That's the problem with you skeptical type

The obvious problem with this statement is that you are here, by choice, on a forum with the word "skeptic" in the URL. If you were actually concerned about this then presumably you would be posting elsewhere where people don't have this skeptical problem. Instead, you are here.
 
I don't think you're being more careful, I think you simply deny everything and admit nothing. It's much easier to dismiss Bigfoot as nothing rather than spend any effort looking into it.
Actually no. The topic gets looked into anytime a new claim of evidence comes up. The same is true of ghosts or psychic claims or aliens or any other supernatural claim.

since you see Bigfoot as a myth and not a possibility, then what remains must be accredited only to human imagination or error.
This sounds correct.

The problem with that theory is that Bigfoot sightings are not decreasing, they're increasing every year.
The problem with this claim is that the number of bigfoot pictures is not increasing.
 
...We aren't afraid of the dark like you are, and there's a whole set of animals you get to enjoy. A lot of owls here.

To be fair, though, if you're in poor health and don't get out much it might be a good idea to avoid going out in the park alone at night.

...But, no, that doesn't explain why he left when he had someone with him. Huh.

He's nervous about being in the forest at night, which in itself I wouldn't make fun of. Claiming that family who does go out must be ghost hunters instead of, well, a family having a evening stroll (and the baby was probably a ninja) is where it starts to get weird. I can't ride a bike, but I don't assume people who can are circus acrobats.
 
I don't think you're being more careful, I think you simply deny everything and admit nothing. It's much easier to dismiss Bigfoot as nothing rather than spend any effort looking into it. Ancient and lazy tactic.
What a stupid argument; the very existence of these bigfoot threads testifies that the subject is being "looked into." Looked into and found lacking.
The problem you must contend with is that since you see Bigfoot as a myth and not a possibility . . .
Don't be silly, nearly everyone here admits to the biological possibility of bigfoot; it's the actuality of bigfoot that's the rub. 15,000 years of nothing footie whatsoever is a rather large problem for proponents.
The problem with that theory is that Bigfoot sightings are not decreasing, they're increasing every year. So if you are correct, that suggests that there is a serious problem with the human psyche that is increasing each year Worldwide.
Anonymous reports are increasing; I write stories every day. So what?
In either case, I'm on the side that thinks something should be investigated.
Chris B.
What is that something you think needs investigating? As noted above, it's being investigated nearly every day here; it's just that you folks don't like the results.
 
You are correct,
I know.

. . . the Bigfoot I consider to be a real living biological living creature cannot do impossible things.
No, the bigfoot you claim to think is real does a laundry list of impossible things every day, all related to "living undetected in a high-use recreational area that has been studied nine ways to Sunday."

Your subjective bias against a paranormal bigfoot is at odds with your own description of the beast whose qualities are, by definition, paranormal.
 
ABP, it's a shame that Chris never went out for a campfire at night with family and friends.

That's the first thing that came to my mind -- campfire. I would never have assumed a group of young adults was intending on chasing ghosts, but that's because I've been to late night bonfires and campfires many many times. A lot of them with music.

I guess chasing ghosts is much the same as chasing bigfoot though. At the end of the day (or night) there's nothing to produce in the way of evidence.

RayG
 
You are correct, the Bigfoot I consider to be a real living biological living creature cannot do impossible things. That's the problem with you skeptical type, you tend to group all Bigfoot reports into one category where as for one to be true all must also be true. In reality, it doesn't work that way.
Chris B.
Except the problem here is that the bigfoot you believe in hasn't been shown to exist anywhere outside your imaginination. Your own photos betray you. Your stories are no different than any others I've read, here at the BFF or in any of the BFRO "reports." No different than any silly habituator nonsense, the excited purple prose of the NAWACers, or even Bobo howling in the woods.

Yes, I do group your stories (and that's all they are) in with these rest because there is not a single thing, no method to distinguish your narrative from the rest. According to you, and these others as well, footie is right over there. But not a single one of you has ever managed to collect an iota of biological evidence, an unambiguous photo, anything of import to at least wet the beak of outside parties.*

* Sykes beak was moistened but the DNA said no.
 
Last edited:
Typically, I tend to file some incidents or reports in with the "UFO Bigfoot" and other more incredible reports as I'm not really interested in those. .
Chris B.

You are a UFO Bigfoot Denialist. You should keep an open mind, if you can't disprove it was a UFO Bigfoot, you should give it some weight.

Seriously. UFO Bigfoot has the same amount of verifiable evidence supporting it's existence as Earthly Bigfoot. What's more, if you are to believe the anecdotal reports, it would seem that UFO Bigfoot origins, are far more feasible than an Earth-bound Animal accomplishing what it is claimed to do.
 
Interesting… It seems the usual ghost hunting grounds are “haunted” buildings (houses, factories, museums, pubs, etc.) and cemeteries. Ghost hunting at a forest? What were they looking for? Ghosts of deer? Or maybe bigfoot ghosts? That's it - they were hunting bigfoot ghosts.

Ah, yes, as an alternative, maybe there was a nearby haunted manor and they were heading towards it. Or perhaps a ghost town. Very plausible.

What sort of ghost-hunting gadgets and gizmos they were carrying that Cervelo missed to notice? Proton packs? Ecto Googles? Oh, sorry, those are the ghostbusters’ gear… Ghost hunters use EMF Meters. Cervelo, not having the super-footer-spider sense certainly failed to perceive their presence inside the backpacks… Very plausible (tall) tale.

Chris’ tall tales are attention whoring. Hopefully he is just trolling, having fun trying to bait skeptics. The other options are troublesome, for they involve dishonesty and/or perhaps some psychological disorder.
 
Very likely they were spelunkers, heading out at night, going to explore a cave that is off limits. You don't really need the sun to do that.

It would also explain why they were unclear where they were going.


In fact, maybe they pretend to be Bigfoot to keep the meddling Bigfoot hunters scared, and out of the woods at night.
 
Chris,

You asked the "ghost hunters" if they were going where we went. You passed them on a trail going the other way, what did you expect them to say? How did they know how far you and Cervelo walked?

Indeed I have the same question!
This hike has two documented destinations, the first has a structure that the majority of people would stop at.

Sooooo Chris did you ask them if they were going to our final destination?

If not how on earth do you determine someone is lying to you if you didn't tell them our ultimate destination?
 
Very likely they were spelunkers, heading out at night, going to explore a cave that is off limits. You don't really need the sun to do that.

It would also explain why they were unclear where they were going.


In fact, maybe they pretend to be Bigfoot to keep the meddling Bigfoot hunters scared, and out of the woods at night.

There are two documented destinations on this hike the first has a structure that the majority of people would stop at.
The trail/road to this location is extremely well maintained and a very easy walk.
 
Interesting… It seems the usual ghost hunting grounds are “haunted” buildings (houses, factories, museums, pubs, etc.) and cemeteries. Ghost hunting at a forest? What were they looking for? Ghosts of deer? Or maybe bigfoot ghosts? That's it - they were hunting bigfoot ghosts.

Ah, yes, as an alternative, maybe there was a nearby haunted manor and they were heading towards it. Or perhaps a ghost town. Very plausible.

What sort of ghost-hunting gadgets and gizmos they were carrying that Cervelo missed to notice? Proton packs? Ecto Googles? Oh, sorry, those are the ghostbusters’ gear… Ghost hunters use EMF Meters. Cervelo, not having the super-footer-spider sense certainly failed to perceive their presence inside the backpacks… Very plausible (tall) tale.

Chris’ tall tales are attention whoring. Hopefully he is just trolling, having fun trying to bait skeptics. The other options are troublesome, for they involve dishonesty and/or perhaps some psychological disorder.

I assumed they were carrying equipment to make a space time jump to Bigfoots home world....but on reflection and my return to reality most likley musical instruments.
But yes based on my time with Chris and his conduct here your assesment is spot on....boys got issues ;)
 
Drew, you are wrong. You are wrong because I never took my kid to a cave at night. Thus nobody else would do it. <- period. And I am never worng. <-Another period.

^Just in case, that was sarcasm, BTW.


So, they were in a hunt for bigfoot ghosts.

Wait, what? Musical instruments?
Nope, scratch that. The were NSA agents prying on you and erasing bigfoot evidence.
 
Drew, you are wrong. You are wrong because I never took my kid to a cave at night. Thus nobody else would do it. <- period. And I am never worng. <-Another period.

^Just in case, that was sarcasm, BTW.


So, they were in a hunt for bigfoot ghosts.

Wait, what? Musical instruments?
Nope, scratch that. The were NSA agents prying on you and erasing bigfoot evidence.
^^^
This would be right in the wheelhouse of someone that has people sign NDAs and conducts super secret research in a area that gets 2 million visitors a year.

This same area has species that are endemic to this location...meaning they have not been found anywhere else in.....the world.

There's nothing unknown in this part of the world over 1lbs period.
 
I had posted that to cervelo. I asked them if they were going to a certain specific destination which I will not mention in the forum as it is where Cervelo and I were coming from. They knew the destination I referred to as I called it by name to them and they replied "Yes".

Cervelo knew what I was talking about though I did not mention it here for obvious reasons about the location.

Chris B.


Your reason for not sharing a location in a freaking public park is "obvious?" That's a laugh. Even if you were being serious, what would be the reasons for not wanting more people looking for this thing? Afraid some would get a clear photo or some mystery poop and blow all of our minds?

ABP is right; game playing is the only hypothesis that accurately explains all of the behavior we see here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom