• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Professing to be Christian without believing in God

barehl

Master Poster
Joined
Jul 8, 2013
Messages
2,655
The statistics suggest that a lot more people say they are Christian than actually are Christian. I didn't have this material at hand when I started the thread about the usefulness of the terms theism and atheism. That thread is now useless. Perhaps this can be discussed here without falling into meaningless semantics.

Daniel Dennett - How To Tell Youre An Atheist (Full)

This was talk was quite interesting because it suggested that far less of the population in the UK are actually religious than say that they are religious. Church attendance in the UK is only about 6% with the average attendee being 51 years old. Yet, 54% claim to be Christian.

With this in mind, I decided to check on figures for the US. I wanted to do this because evangelical conservatives tend to claim that something like 90% of the world is religious. Gallup polls suggest that 40% of the population regularly attend church. If this were true then maybe most Americans would be religious. But I found another study from some people who acutally care about the practice of religion rather than public relations:

An Up Close Look at Church Attendance in America

The conclusion in this article matches Dennett's talk:

What Hadaway and Marler, along with Mark Chaves, author of the “National Congregations Study,” discovered was at play is what researchers call “the halo effect” — the difference between what people tell pollsters and what people actually do. Americans tend to over-report socially desirable behavior like voting and attending church and under-report socially undesirable behavior like drinking.

Regular church attendance in the US is less than 20%. It is projected to be down to 15.4% in 2020 and further down to 11.7% by 2050.

What good is a term like "atheist" if people who have no belief in God don't admit to being atheist? How accurate is professing to be Christian if you don't actually believe in God? Dennett's talk included actual ministers who don't believe in God. The terms theist and atheist are probably far less useful and accurate than they appear to be outside of esoteric philosophical discussions.
 
You think it was tough to come to a consensus on defining Athiest/Thiest - Good luck finding a consensus on what constitutes being a Christian.
 
You think it was tough to come to a consensus on defining Athiest/Thiest - Good luck finding a consensus on what constitutes being a Christian.

I believe the primary requirement is that they must be Scottish.
 
My departed father was a rather "pro-forma" Christian. Nominally Catholic, he attended church regularly and my sister and I both went to Catholic school. He was a member of the Knights of Columbus....

But when a little drunk, he would admit that he didn't believe in any sort of afterlife....which is rather the whole point of Christianity....
I've known numbers of nominal Christians who seem to pick and choose what aspects of the religion they like and which ones they don't. Hard to find any hard-core American Catholics that eschew birth control...
 
I was discussing religion with a friend who has no religious beliefs and at one point he said he was christian, when I asked him why he considered himself christian he replied that it was because he'd been christened as a baby. So I guess that's what he'll put down as his religion on any forms that ask.
 
churchleaders.com said:
If present trends continue, the percentage of the population that attends church in 2050 is estimated to be at almost half of 1990″s attendance — a drop from 20.4% to 11.7%. Olson”s projections for the years leading up to 2050 are less than encouraging. He estimates a drop to 16.6% in 2010, and 15.4% in 2020.
Good news!

However, nothing in that article says that people who don't attend church regularly are actually atheists.

Church attendance in the UK is only about 6% with the average attendee being 51 years old. Yet, 54% claim to be Christian.
In the UK being 'Christian' is more about tradition than belief. Many Brits identify with a particular church simply because they were born into it - even if they don't believe in God - and this is not seen as hypocritical. It is quite different than in many parts of the US, where Atheists are thought to be immoral and untrustworthy.

Americans tend to over-report socially desirable behavior like voting and attending church
Well everybody should vote, so those who don't may not want to admit it. But church? What is so 'socially desirable' about church attendance that half the Christian population would lie about it? Perhaps they just haven't read their own bible:-

Matthew 6:5
"When you pray, you are not to be like the hypocrites; for they love to stand and pray in the synagogues and on the street corners so that they may be seen by men. Truly I say to you, they have their reward in full. "But you, when you pray, go into your inner room, close your door and pray to your Father who is in secret"
 
Last edited:
The biggest hurdle for me in Christianity isn't believing in God. It's believing what I consider the incoherent doctrine that "Jesus died for my sins." This is played up more in the U.S., IMO.

I enjoy a series of novels with many characters who are Anglican priests (in England). This particular angle - that Jesus suffered on the cross in order to redeem all of humanity - is not played up. The minor preach-i-ness involved instead points to Jesus as an exceptionally integrated human being, who also is a great symbol of the (alleged) reality of a redemptive dynamic at play in the whole of Creation.

There is a fair amount of fancy metaphorical footwork in the novels of Susan Howatch, but it allows for a non-literal belief in Bible stories. The literalism common in the U.S. is what turns me off - if I do not literally believe a creed, I will literally burn in hell forever. So no, I can't buy in - what if I choose the wrong version of Christianity? But I could come close to saying, "I am a follower of Jesus Christ," if I pursue his (reported) behavior as ideal, and if I am granted wide latitude to interpret literary language as symbolic.

I do like this quote from Flannery O'Connor, though: "Well if it's a symbol, to hell with it." Courage of her convictions and all. I once asked a co-worker if she was a good Catholic and her wry reply was that she was an observant Catholic. I thought this a nice distinction. At the time, she apparently felt that religious practice worked for her.
 
The statistics suggest that a lot more people say they are Christian than actually are Christian. I didn't have this material at hand when I started the thread about the usefulness of the terms theism and atheism. That thread is now useless. Perhaps this can be discussed here without falling into meaningless semantics.

Daniel Dennett - How To Tell Youre An Atheist (Full)

This was talk was quite interesting because it suggested that far less of the population in the UK are actually religious than say that they are religious. Church attendance in the UK is only about 6% with the average attendee being 51 years old. Yet, 54% claim to be Christian.

With this in mind, I decided to check on figures for the US. I wanted to do this because evangelical conservatives tend to claim that something like 90% of the world is religious. Gallup polls suggest that 40% of the population regularly attend church. If this were true then maybe most Americans would be religious. But I found another study from some people who acutally care about the practice of religion rather than public relations:

An Up Close Look at Church Attendance in America

The conclusion in this article matches Dennett's talk:

What Hadaway and Marler, along with Mark Chaves, author of the “National Congregations Study,” discovered was at play is what researchers call “the halo effect” — the difference between what people tell pollsters and what people actually do. Americans tend to over-report socially desirable behavior like voting and attending church and under-report socially undesirable behavior like drinking.

Regular church attendance in the US is less than 20%. It is projected to be down to 15.4% in 2020 and further down to 11.7% by 2050.

What good is a term like "atheist" if people who have no belief in God don't admit to being atheist? How accurate is professing to be Christian if you don't actually believe in God? Dennett's talk included actual ministers who don't believe in God. The terms theist and atheist are probably far less useful and accurate than they appear to be outside of esoteric philosophical discussions.
People that call themselves “Christians” and believe in god(s) are theists.

People that call themselves “Christians” and don’t believe in god(s) are atheists.

People that don’t believe in god(s) and deny they’re atheists are no different than people telling lies and denying they're liars.

What good then is the term “liar”?
 
Last edited:
What Hadaway and Marler, along with Mark Chaves, author of the “National Congregations Study,” discovered was at play is what researchers call “the halo effect” — the difference between what people tell pollsters and what people actually do. Americans tend to over-report socially desirable behavior like voting and attending church and under-report socially undesirable behavior like drinking.

It is called the Hawthorn effect.
 
What good is a term like "atheist" if people who have no belief in God don't admit to being atheist?

What good is a term like "homosexual" if people who are sexually attracted to members of the same gender don't admit to being homosexual?

Just because some people may choose to hide their true positions regarding various beliefs for social reasons, it doesn't alter the reality of those positions. "Atheist" is a useful term to describe someone who has no positive belief in gods. In the case of someone who chooses to hide that lack of belief, I would add an adjective like "closeted". But the presence of the modifier does not invalidate the usefulness of the noun.
 
However, nothing in that article says that people who don't attend church regularly are actually atheists.
That wasn't quite the point. People who claim to be religious may not be as religious as conservative evangelicals would like to think.

As for being atheist but claiming to be Christian, we do have some evidence:


The two, who asked that their real identities be protected, are pastors who have lost their faith. And these two men, who have built their careers and lives around faith, say they now feel trapped, living a lie.

If a practicing minister can be an atheist then I assume someone who claims to be a Christian could be one too. But, Dennett points out that a number of Christians who claim not to be atheists give a definition of their belief that would actually exclude belief in God.
 
My departed father was a rather "pro-forma" Christian. Nominally Catholic, he attended church regularly and my sister and I both went to Catholic school. He was a member of the Knights of Columbus....

But when a little drunk, he would admit that he didn't believe in any sort of afterlife....which is rather the whole point of Christianity.
Not quite. A large part of the point is the prep work in the mortal coil before encountering same.
A summation: James 2: 20-24 KJV
20 But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead?
21 Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar?
22 Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?
23 And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God.
24 Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.
It occurs to me that Martin Luther skipped that part.
 
I've been a closeted atheist most of my life. Because it would hurt people I care about if I came out.

^ This is some circumstances.
Sitting at my 85 year old christian mother's death bed would not be the time for me to proclaim my atheism.
 
My mother used to say this. She was verging on agnosticism at the time but felt there was something 'good' about Christianity she didn't want to lose. I think one can subscribe to many of the ideas in the sermon on the Mount, which I think encapsulates the humanity of Christianity and in that sense one can be a 'Christian' of sorts. I suspect though to be a 'real' Christian there are a few givens one has to take on board, not least that Jesus was the son of god and rose from the dead.
 

Back
Top Bottom