I guess if you were trying to prove that the Bible has errors and is self contradictory then you've succeeded.Or were you trying to prove that the alteration of a name is somehow justified by altering the name?
Exactly!
I guess if you were trying to prove that the Bible has errors and is self contradictory then you've succeeded.Or were you trying to prove that the alteration of a name is somehow justified by altering the name?
Here is a reply previously used to reply to your other shenanigans and is a very apt reply to your current tomfoolery.
Regards and may Angra Mainyu teach you the way!
That's one heck of an argument you're having with yourself. I hope you win.
It's possible I might not be aware. I find it more likely we are talking to the emperor's new tailor.
I'd add that when your philosophy contradicts reality, you just did an ad-absurdum disproof of said philosophy. Doubly so when actually it's just illustrating one's own ignorance.
Navel gazing philosophy is of no value whatsoever, save to grant it's practitioners brief and fleeting feelings of pretend superiority over those they wish they were at least able to intellectually equal. Aside from that it is fluff.
... Your coffee shop pseudo-intellectual shtick wasn't impressive when you hijacked threads with and it ain't impressive here.