Drewbot
Philosopher
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2007
- Messages
- 7,758
Not interested.
http://memegenerator.net/instance/50439133
http://memegenerator.net/instance/50439133
Sorry, but I don't have it. If you seriously would like to attend then I will put you in touch with the organizer and I look forward to meeting you.
Come now. You've signed them, which can't be done without, um HAVING one to sign. There is one for the upcoming expedition too.
This wording demonstrates attending is a requirement for even LOOKING at a non-disclosure agreement, and since the nondisclosure agreement must be signed to attend... ergo the nondisclosure agreement itself is subject to nondisclosure.
So thank you for proving that.
Just a couple things I highlighted. Why in the world would you suspect first off that if something threw candy at you, it would be anything but human? Anything beyond that is ridiculous. Your promotion of bigfoot camping trips and the "phenomenon" is well noted. We most likely know what your motives for posting here are too. A little promotions work here and there never hurts eh. (I understand this being in the entertainment industry myself) Also, why would you suspect "a member of the group" as opposed to someone (a hired actor/participant) else using nightvision to to navigate around? (if any was needed) Does this group par chance toss candy at suspected bigfoots also?! lol
Candy, and bigfoot? Come on son, you can do better than that!


I signed them for the BFRO but since I'm part of the SRA, it isn't needed so I've not had to sign one.
Here is the BFRO non-disclosure agreement form:
http://www.bfro.net/docs/nda.htm
Confidential Information does not include information that is approved by the Organizer, in writing, for release.
Here is the BFRO non-disclosure agreement form:
http://www.bfro.net/docs/nda.htm

What does their contract say about in the event of confirmation?
Would the BFRO delete an encounter report from their database if the submitter later contacted them to say that they no longer think that they saw a Bigfoot and that they no longer believe that Bigfoot exists? Has that ever happened before? They have thousands and thousands of encounter reports.
They won't delete it but they will remove it from public view and change the classification. Internally, they have their own rating system, so if they don't believe the report is legitimate, they mark it as such.
Only a small portion are actually available to the public.
So the ****** ones they actually make a available are the best of the best?
Speaks volumes.
When I read/hear the acronym BLAARG, I have a very specific character that comes to mind...