Lord Language Resurrection.

[Nationalcosmopolitan]

Wrong. Dead people remain dead. Permanently.

To make it clearer let us presume that we put the person into the state of artificial coma every 7th Day and at the end of 7th Day we derive him from this state.
We see that very week the person becomes stronger and stronger.
The person of the "To eat only in the 7th Day lifestyle" feels similar.

 

[Nay_Sayer]

To make it clearer let us presume that we put the person into the state of artificial coma every 7th Day and at the end of 7th Day we derive him from this state.
We see that very week the person becomes stronger and stronger.
The person of the "To eat only in the 7th Day lifestyle" feels similar.

None of that is correct at all.

Coma's do not make you stronger.

Honestly, Where do you get this stuff from?

 

[Craig B]

To make it clearer let us presume that we put the person into the state of artificial coma every 7th Day and at the end of 7th Day we derive him from this state.
We see that very week the person becomes stronger and stronger.
The person of the "To eat only in the 7th Day lifestyle" feels similar.

If you are not in a state of artificial coma yourself, can you now comment on my previous post?

... Strong's Concordance lists these verses as containing the word "Hebrew" in the MT version of the Tanakh.
Genesis 14:13; 39:14; 39:17; 40:15; 41:12; 42:3.
Exodus 1:15; 1:16; 1:19; 2:6; 2:7; 2:11; 2:13, 3:18; 5:3; 7:16; 9:1; 9:13; 10:3; 21:2.
Deuteronomy 15:12.
1 Samuel 4:6; 4:9; 13:3; 13:7; 13:19; 14:11, 21; 29:3.
Jeremiah 34:9; 34:14.
Jonah 1:9.

 

[Craig4]

Let us presume that we make the social poll and ask people separately about every of 4 my blocks and 13 constitutional points.
For sure most people will agree minimum with one of those 17 points.
So most people will be the members of my "New Saturday Movement".
If you like to drink vodka as I it doesn't mean that you are the member of my movement.

So these people who you say agree with one of your points. What are they doing to advance your goal?

Agreeing with one point doesn't mean that person wants to start an apocalyptic war and destroy the world economy.

 

[Nonpareil]

Coma's do not make you stronger.

Honestly, Where do you get this stuff from?

Dragon Ball Z.

 

[bruto]

None of that is correct at all.

Coma's do not make you stronger.

Honestly, Where do you get this stuff from?

Maybe it is relative. After all, if you put one person in a coma and feed the other one a diet of raw chicken, there is a possibility that the coma victim will come out ahead.

 

[abaddon]

The systems of quality assurance use the statistical methods of random samples.

Nope. Plain flat out wrong. While statistical methods may be deployed where appropriate, they are not required and often not used at all.

Unless you are willing to define the question "Does it work or not?" as "statistical methods". I have implemented plenty of ISO systems where even simple maths was not necessary to attain independent accreditation and certification.

My system of social quality assurance uses the statistical methods of random samples and the system of procedures of anonymous communications between experts and and authors of projects.

What? You already claimed anonymity was verboten. Has that changed? Or is it simply applied when it suits you? What experts? What authors? If they are as you claim, anonymous how can you tell whether they are honest or dishonest? Whether they actually are experts or crackpots? Whether they are genuine "authors" or just making stuff up?

Job places and state power places accordion lottery from professional tested candidates is the social quality assurance system too.

That is a word salad from which no sensible meaning can be derived. Please rephrase in some more meaningful way. Perhaps autocorrect caused an issue, as I cannot see how accordions fit into your scheme. If you want to ban accordians then I am all with you (thanks, Pterry).

 

[Nationalcosmopolitan]

This is all an absolutely correct and accurate portrayal of reality on Planet Sausage.

If my project is correct for any planet of of intelligent beings it is correct for our world too.

 

[Nationalcosmopolitan]

In Ancient Athens the system of selection by lot was managed on behalf of the Assembly, a body of citizens that was the sovereign power in the state.

Who will exercise sovereign power in your dystopia? Numbers? Your laws will be the laws of mathematics? That is gibberish. If there are criminals in a democracy - which has ways of limiting the damage they do - above all a free press and frequent elections - how many more will there be when criminals in power have to fear not the laws of the country, but the laws of mathematics?

Did Stalin's gang of brigands and thieves fear mathematics? Or did they fear democracy and free expression? Mathematics was the one thing they left alone. It presented no danger to their power. Freedom of voting they ruthlessly suppressed.

For example.
You are the person who want to be the prime minister.
You have to be successful in professional test.
It is the test that can go successfully 9 from 10 ordinary doctors, engineers, scientists, businessmen, programmers, high skill workers.
After that you have to be successful in lottery.
After that you have to work as the shadow cabinet for about a year with the previous prime minister with the same level access to all information as he.
After that you are ready to work on this place but only for 1 cadence.
And the same model on every power state place of every brunch and level.
In every power state place you are not the decisions maker you are garant of effective and transparent procedures of projects of decision making processes.

 

[erwinl]

For example.
You are the person who want to be the prime minister.
You have to be successful in professional test.
It is the test that can go successfully 9 from 10 ordinary doctors, engineers, scientists, businessmen, programmers, high skill workers.
After that you have to be successful in lottery.
After that you have to work as the shadow cabinet for about a year with the previous prime minister with the same level access to all information as he.
After that you are ready to work on this place but only for 1 cadence.
And the same model on every power state place of every brunch and level.
In every power state place you are not the decisions maker you are garant of effective and transparent procedures of projects of decision making processes.

Oh cool!
Every year new leaders, just like in Republican Rome.
And just as incapable of making necessary long term decisions.

 

[Craig B]

For example.
You are the person who want to be the prime minister.
You have to be successful in professional test.

Devised and marked by whom? Remember that Stalin started his rise to power as a Secretary of the Party, organising the allocation of Party members to various tasks. He used that function to usurp power.

It is the test that can go successfully 9 from 10 ordinary doctors, engineers, scientists, businessmen, programmers, high skill workers.
After that you have to be successful in lottery.

Who organises the lottery?

After that you have to work as the shadow cabinet for about a year with the previous prime minister with the same level access to all information as he.
After that you are ready to work on this place but only for 1 cadence.

And what then forces you to relinquish office? Your dystopia has no elected legislative assembly!

And the same model on every power state place of every brunch and level.
In every power state place you are not the decisions maker you are garant of effective and transparent procedures of projects of decision making processes.

You, personally, are the guarantor? There is no democratic oversight? Crazy.

 

[Nationalcosmopolitan]

You have stated that the word "Hebrew" doesn't occur in the text of the Tanakh.

Yes!
Hebrew in our language sounds "Ivrit" - the language of the nation - "Ivri".
The language of citizens of Judea has the name in Tanakh.
In our language it sounds "Ihudit".
"Juda" sounds in our language "Ihuda".

My question is simple. Is the above statement true or not?

No.
Because "Ivrim" are the sons of Ever and not only the Sons of Israel or Juda.
The language of Torah is not the language of nation Ivrim.
It is the language of Israel citizens.
Religion people believe that it is the language of Vavilon Tawer builders - the single language of people that Jews had to safe.

 

[sackett]

...Crazy.

Okay, is this thread over now?

 

[Craig B]

No.
Because "Ivrim" are the sons of Ever and not only the Sons of Israel or Juda.
The language of Torah is not the language of nation Ivrim.
It is the language of Israel citizens.
Religion people believe that it is the language of Vavilon Tawer builders - the single language of people that Jews had to safe.

That has nothing whatever to do with my question. I have stated that the word Hebrews occurs in the Tanakh.

Hebrews (Hebrew: עברים or עבריים, Tiberian ʿIḇrîm, ʿIḇriyyîm; Modern Hebrew ʿIvrim, ʿIvriyyim; ISO 259-3 ʕibrim, ʕibriyim) is a term appearing 34 times within 32 verses of the Tanakh (Hebrew Bible).

as noted in wiki. And I have listed the relevant verses from Strong's Concordance. I did not ask about the language of Israeli citizens, or about the Tower of Babel.

 

[Nationalcosmopolitan]

OK. Now I'm on the side of people thinking this is an elaborate joke.

Ever seen any zombie movie? The resurrected are always slow, moaning and subject to having piano's dropped on their heads.

What is the goal of person who has solved the task of limit difficulty for him?
To be ready to solve the other task of the higher level.
The process of every week death and resurrection gives this ability.
It is not my joke and it is not what I can prove.
It's just my hypothesis.

 

[Nationalcosmopolitan]

Did any of the people you talked to give you money or offer to organize support?

Because state power depends from money in every so called democracy states of criminals I need not those type of money for my support.
Presume please that I have invented the the judge - robot.
From this moment the sides of the judicial process will not depend from amount of money they can pay to their lawyers.
My judge - robot can make mistakes of course.
But the probability of those mistakes will not for sure depend from how many money have the sides of process.
Something the same will be in my " state power according lottery" system.

 

[Craig B]

Because state power depends from money in every so called democracy states of criminals I need not those type of money for my support.
Presume please that I have invented the the judge - robot.
From this moment the sides of the judicial process will not depend from amount of money they can pay to their lawyers.
My judge - robot can make mistakes of course.
But the probability of those mistakes will not for sure depend from how many money have the sides of process.
Something the same will be in my " state power according lottery" system.

No I will not presume that you have invented robot judges, or are able to mechanise juridical procedures in any way, unless you can provide evidence that you are able to construct such machines.

I notice that by your own admission, your sortition process will result in your dystopia being governed by robots. I have asked this sort of question before: who will programme these robot judges and cabinet ministers?

 

[Nationalcosmopolitan]

Yes, what you write here is true. If the thieves and prostitutes eat fifteen pounds of raw unsalted buckwheat mash, four pounds of raw chicken plus raw beet on Saturday and nothing on the other days, soon there will be no thieves and prostitutes.

"To eat only in the 7th Day lifestyle" will make the health of thieves and prostitutes very strong together with the health of honest people.
But 4 blocks of my project together with 13 principles I have told about will eliminate most criminal events.

 

[Nationalcosmopolitan]

The EU is working pretty good at the moment. The euro might struggle a bit, but the EU as a whole does pretty well.
At least we're not subject to some technocratic horror as your proposal.

EU constructs the global multiculturalism of monoculture persons.
It is the main reason why in the most cases EU receives the total tolerance relationship of hating each other monoculture persons.
My technocratic methods of high social quality achievements give another reality of course.
You have to understand that the domination of lawyers and economists in every brunches and levels of state power is he main reason of global catastrophic situation.
Technocratic persons have to dominate in every points of state power but they will be educated as lawyers and economists too of course.

 

[Nationalcosmopolitan]

I would think that the vast majority of people will find that only one of your "four greatest books" to be worthy of the title "greatest book" and then only because there has been a level of religious indoctrination and that they would find the other three useless. It is precisely the people who think that at least three of those books are of no value that you must convince that your idea is sound and worthy of following.

Frankly, hate between groups of people is going to continue so long as people are predisposed to tribalism - something about 9,000 years of city living hasn't done - some reading certainly isn't going to do it.

It is the matter of fact that for thousands years billions of people read those 4 books with great respect.
Let us simply respect those billions of people and let us teach our children to respect them by reading those 4 books.
It is the absolutely reliable way to eliminate the most forms of hatred between people.
Today most people have the great respect only to 1 of those books and the great hatred to 3 others.
But most of those people are secular once only for last 50 years.
So we have a real ability to use this new situation and force them to read 4 books.
For religion persons it is not so easy but for secular persons it is not a problem and it will give great global positive result.
It is simple task for professionals of manipulation technologies .