DOJ: Ferguson PD descrimination against blacks is routine

I would think that small forces would be more prone to corruption. There are fewer people who need to be corrupted for it to work. Someone in charge of 5,000 officers would hopefully be paid more than someone in charge of 50 officers, so at the least, one would hope their price would be higher. Potentially corrupt officers probably need to be in the right environment, with either little effective oversight, or sympathetic oversight. Because the chain of command is longer in a large force and spread out over more sites, oversight of a potentially corrupt cop is likely to have their own superior. With a small force, a family working in the force would represent a disproportionate fraction of the total force whilst they would be far less influential in a large force.

Because they cover a larger area, the chief officers will be higher profile and subject to wider scrutiny by the press.

I think the kind of corruption might be different. In big cities you have organized crime making big pay offs for the cops to basically look the other way.
Frankly, the money invovled with the Ferguson police is petty cash compared to what corrupt cops in Chicago or New York can make from the local mob bagman....
 
It also shows that a small town government can be just as corrupt as a big city.

I would think that small forces would be more prone to corruption. There are fewer people who need to be corrupted for it to work.

I would argue that, in a lot of ways, Ferguson is not unique. However, as one of the many St. Louis Country townships, it is fairly unusual in one respect. It is a small town, but it is a small town in a crowded urban setting. In almost any other area, it would be a part of St. Louis city, but St. Louis has the crazy history where the city can't/won't/didn't annex surrounding land as it grew, so this patchwork system of townships grew up around it instead in what is known as St. Louis County.

My point is that Ferguson may be a small town in terms of geographic size and population, but it is big city urban in terms of social dynamics. Maybe political dynamics, but I can't really speak to that.
 
I think the kind of corruption might be different. In big cities you have organized crime making big pay offs for the cops to basically look the other way.
Frankly, the money invovled with the Ferguson police is petty cash compared to what corrupt cops in Chicago or New York can make from the local mob bagman....

The fact that it is petty cash is part of my point. If you are going to buy a cop in New York, you need deeper pockets compared to Ferguson.
 
I do find it likely. Maybe it is just media reporting although I believe the facts uphold the view. I do not believe there is something inherent in African-Americans that would make it so.

The report itself shows double standards

(quoting a fair bit as my understanding of copyright is that it is public domain).

The common practice among Ferguson officials of writing off tickets further evidences a double standard grounded in racial stereotyping. Even as Ferguson City officials maintain the harmful stereotype that black individuals lack personal responsibility—and continue to cite this lack of personal responsibility as the cause of the disparate impact of Ferguson’s practices—white City officials condone a striking lack of personal responsibility among themselves and their friends. Court records and emails show City officials, including the Municipal Judge, the Court Clerk, and FPD supervisors assisting friends, colleagues, acquaintances, and themselves in eliminating citations, fines, and fees. For example:
 In August 2014, the Court Clerk emailed Municipal Judge Brockmeyer a copy of a Failure to Appear notice for a speeding violation issued by the City of Breckenridge, and asked: “[FPD patrol supervisor] came to me this morning, could you please take [care] of this for him in Breckenridge?” The Judge replied: “Sure.” Judge Brockmeyer also serves as Municipal Judge in Breckenridge.
 In October 2013, Judge Brockmeyer sent Ferguson’s Prosecuting Attorney an email with the subject line “City of Hazelwood vs. Ronald Brockmeyer.” The Judge wrote: “Pursuant to our conversation, attached please find the red light camera ticket received by the undersigned. I would appreciate it if you would please see to it that this ticket is dismissed.” The Prosecuting Attorney, who also serves as prosecuting attorney in Hazelwood, responded: “I worked on red light matters today and dismissed the ticket that you sent over. Since I entered that into the system today, you may or may not get a second notice – you can just ignore that.”

 In August 2013, an FPD patrol supervisor wrote an email entitled “Oops” to the Prosecuting Attorney regarding a ticket his relative received in another municipality for traveling 59 miles per hour in a 40 miles-per-hour zone, noting “[h]aving it dismissed would be a blessing.” The Prosecuting Attorney responded that the prosecutor of that other municipality promised to nolle pros the ticket. The supervisor responded with appreciation, noting that the dismissal “[c]ouldn’t have come at a better time.”
 Also in August 2013, Ferguson’s Mayor emailed the Prosecuting Attorney about a parking ticket received by an employee of a non-profit day camp for which the Mayor sometimes volunteers. The Mayor wrote that the person “shouldn’t have left his car unattended there, but it was an honest mistake” and stated, “I would hate for him to have to pay for this, can you help?” The Prosecuting Attorney forwarded the email to the Court Clerk, instructing her to “NP [nolle prosequi, or not prosecute] this parking ticket.”
 In November 2011, a court clerk received a request from a friend to “fix a parking ticket” received by the friend’s coworker’s wife. After the ticket was faxed to the clerk, she replied: “It’s gone baby!”
 In March 2014, a friend of the Court Clerk’s relative emailed the Court Clerk with a scanned copy of a ticket asking if there was anything she could do to help. She responded: “Your ticket of $200 has magically disappeared!” Later, in June 2014, the same person emailed the Court Clerk regarding two tickets and asked: “Can you work your magic again? It would be deeply appreciated.” The Clerk later informed him one ticket had been dismissed and she was waiting to hear back about the second ticket.

These are just a few illustrative examples. It is clear that writing off tickets between the Ferguson court staff and the clerks of other municipal courts in the region is routine. Email exchanges show that Ferguson officials secured or received ticket write-offs from staff in a number of neighboring municipalities. There is evidence that the Court Clerk and a City of Hazelwood clerk “fixed” at least 12 tickets at each other’s request, and that the Court Clerk successfully sought help with a ticket from a clerk in St. Ann. And in April 2011, a court administrator in the City of Pine Lawn emailed the Ferguson Court Clerk to have a warrant recalled for a person applying for a job with the Pine Lawn Police Department. The court administrator explained that “[a]fter he gets the job, he will have money to pay off his fines with Ferguson.” The Court Clerk recalled the warrant and issued a new court date for more than two months after the request was made

And their analysis of this

City officials’ application of the stereotype that African Americans lack “personal responsibility” to explain why Ferguson’s practices harm African Americans, even as these same City officials exhibit a lack of personal—and professional—responsibility in handling their own and their friends’ code violations, is further evidence of discriminatory bias on the part of decision makers central to the direction of law enforcement in Ferguson.
 
I would argue that, in a lot of ways, Ferguson is not unique. However, as one of the many St. Louis Country townships, it is fairly unusual in one respect. It is a small town, but it is a small town in a crowded urban setting. In almost any other area, it would be a part of St. Louis city, but St. Louis has the crazy history where the city can't/won't/didn't annex surrounding land as it grew, so this patchwork system of townships grew up around it instead in what is known as St. Louis County.

My point is that Ferguson may be a small town in terms of geographic size and population, but it is big city urban in terms of social dynamics. Maybe political dynamics, but I can't really speak to that.
Interesting that you have the same situation in Los Angeles....the City of LA only has juridiction over a small portion of the Metro area,resulting in endless jurisdictional disputes. The most infamous is that between the LAPD and the LA county Sheriff's office, which have overlapping jurisdictions where, on paper, both have authority. Joseph Wambaugh has written quite a bit about this.
 
Last edited:
I do find it likely. Maybe it is just media reporting although I believe the facts uphold the view. I do not believe there is something inherent in African-Americans that would make it so.

Again further evidenceof bias from the report

During our investigation, FPD officials told us that their police tactics are responsive to the scenario at hand. But records suggest that, where a suspect or group of suspects is white, FPD applies a different calculus, typically resulting in a more measured law enforcement response. In one 2012 incident, for example, officers reported responding to a fight in progress at a local bar that involved white suspects. Officers reported encountering “40-50 people actively fighting, throwing bottles and glasses, as well as chairs.” The report noted that “one subject had his ear bitten off.” While the responding officers reported using force, they only used “minimal baton and flashlight strikes as well as fists, muscling techniques and knee strikes.” While the report states that “due to the amount of subjects fighting, no physical arrests were possible,” it notes also that four subjects were brought to the station for “safekeeping.” While we have found other evidence that FPD later issued a wanted for two individuals as a result of the incident, FPD’s response stands in stark contrast to the actions officers describe taking in many incidents involving black suspects, some of which we earlier described.
 
The "Disparity Index" measures the likelihood drivers of a given race or ethnic group are stopped based on their proportion of the residential population age 16 and over.
You know, the more I think about this the less plausible it sounds.

Why would the residential population be the baseline? Wouldn't the relevant metric be the proportion of drivers on the roads?

I have no idea what the Ferguson area is like, so what is the racial makeup of the surrounding towns? If they are mostly white then you'd expect drivers in Ferguson to be white in a higher proportion than the population of Ferguson. If they are mostly black then you'd expect drivers in Ferguson more likely to be black than the population of Ferguson, and thus blacks would be more likely to be pulled over without any racial discrimination occurring.

After all, drivers don't just drive in the town they live in. Particularly in tightly-packed small suburbs in a metropolitan area a driver likely drives through many towns during their daily commute.

So, I don't think this statistic is really relevant without knowing more information than is available so far.

eta: one other possibility is age demographics. If the whites are on average 60 years old and blacks are on average 30 years old (I'm talking about drivers here) then blacks are more likely to get stopped more simply because younger drivers are more reckless, prone to speeding, etc. And given how quickly Ferguson's race demographics has changed in the last 20 years such a large disparity wouldn't surprise me at all, as younger people are more likely to move frequently while older people tend to stay put.
 
Last edited:
In addition to the blatant racism, the cops and the courts were encouraged to write citations and impose fines because a big percentage of the city budget was financed by traffic tickets and related "failure to appear" etc. penalties. People went to jail because they couldn't afford to pay trivial tickets.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...can-turn-into-a-plundering-collection-agency/
No one goes to jail because they can't pay tickets. They go to jail because they don't show up for their court date.
 
No one goes to jail because they can't pay tickets. They go to jail because they don't show up for their court date.

Are you trying to defend the blatant corruptuion in the Fergson PD?

Surpised since you are always blasting the corruption in Illinois.
 
In addition to the blatant racism, the cops and the courts were encouraged to write citations and impose fines because a big percentage of the city budget was financed by traffic tickets and related "failure to appear" etc. penalties. People went to jail because they couldn't afford to pay trivial tickets.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...can-turn-into-a-plundering-collection-agency/
Perhaps the solution applied by Bill White in McMinn County, Tennessee, back in 1946 would be a reasonable response.
 
Two police officers, court clerk out at Ferguson over racist emails
The sources said Henke was associated with an e-mail from 2008 suggesting that President Barack Obama would not be president for very long because a black man can't hold a job. They said Mudd was associated with an e-mail from 2011 suggesting that CrimeStoppers paid a black woman who terminated a pregnancy.

The Justice Department report also detailed other emails as well, including one that depicted Obama as a chimpanzee.
 
No one goes to jail because they can't pay tickets. They go to jail because they don't show up for their court date.

Ferguson has the neat rule in which people who can't pay their fine in full, even if they are in court and are attempting to make a partial payment, are deemed to have "failed to show".
 
No one goes to jail because they can't pay tickets. They go to jail because they don't show up for their court date.

Ferguson has the neat rule in which people who can't pay their fine in full, even if they are in court and are attempting to make a partial payment, are deemed to have "failed to show".

From the DOJ report:
Although Ferguson’s court—unlike many
other municipal courts in the region—has ceased imposing the Failure to Appear charge, the court continues to routinely issue arrest warrants for missed appearances and missed payments.
 
Ferguson has the neat rule in which people who can't pay their fine in full, even if they are in court and are attempting to make a partial payment, are deemed to have "failed to show".

God, Boss Hawg wished he would have thought of that one....
 
Are you trying to defend the blatant corruptuion in the Fergson PD?

Surpised since you are always blasting the corruption in Illinois.
Pardon me for introducing facts and being skeptical.

Crissy Brown

But do continue to wow us with your Superior Intellect™® on all issues.
She wasn't arrested for not paying a ticket. She was arrested for getting caught driving without expired tags, not showing up for her court date, and then pulled over again because she was still driving with expired tags.

You do not go to jail for being unable to pay a ticket.
 

Back
Top Bottom