Here's the video in text format;
http://spawktalk.blogspot.com/
His logic fails on the last part regarding job discrimination. He assumes that employers have knowledge of the studies he cites, and are basing their discriminatory practices on that. That's highly unlikely.
Also refer to the New Jersey turnpike study I linked to. It had very rigorous methodology, and its conclusions did not support the idea of racial profiling. It found that blacks were twice as likely to speed, and more likely to break 90mph -- consistent with the rates at which they are pulled over (twice as likely as whites).
I don't know where you were getting your data from I was getting it from the
Missouri Attorney General's website
Compare the contraband hit rate with the arrest rate.
The "Disparity Index" measures the likelihood drivers of a given race or ethnic group are stopped based on their proportion of the residential population age 16 and over. Values greater than 1 indicate over-representation and values less that 1 indicate under-representation in traffic stops.
The values in the tables and graphs below represent the disparity index.
The "Search Rate" is the percent of stops resulting in a search.
The values in the tables below represent (Searches / Stops). The result of these calculations are represented in the graphs.
The "Contraband Hit Rate" is the percent of searches in which contraband is foun
The "Arrest Rate" is the percent of stops resulting in an arrest.
The values in the tables below represent (Arrests / Stops). The result of these calculations are represented in the graphs.
For 2013, being the latest data:
|Event|White|Black|
|Disparity Index|0.38|1.37|
|Search Rate|47 / 686|562 / 4632|
|Contraband Hit Rate|16 / 47|122 / 562|
|Arrest Rate|36 / 686|483 / 4632|
It is not proof of bias, but it is suspicious.
