Axiom_Blade
Unregistered
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2006
- Messages
- 2,979
For the record, I think non-members critical of the church are terrible when it comes to persuading anyone favorable toward Scientology. The extremes on both sides are just too . . . extreme. The critics charge forward metaphorically waving their arms going "Run! It's sinister and evil! Fear the threat! It's a cult where everything in it is just a deliberate scheme of brainwashing!" A critic not writing "Scientology" without replacing the S with a dollar sign makes them sound more bitter than sensible, like someone who must write "crapple" instead of "apple" because they hate apples.
I had a Scientology phase where I picked up everything I could find about the cult, because it's just so crazy, paranoid, and even criminal. The impression I got is that the reason why Scientology critics are often so extreme is because they're usually ex-Scientologists. They're unhinged because they were traumatized. Scientology unhinged them. Unfortunately, you're right...it can harm their credibility, especially when the things that they're claiming are so outrageous. For outsiders, it's hard to imagine that something like Scientology exists.
