Latest Bigfoot "evidence"

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Shrike said:
Come to think of it, what do you know about that mask? How old is it and what is its provenance? How do we know it's not a recent carving meant to profit from bigfoot mythology rather than an actual artifact of that mythology?
Click to expand...
Ahem:

carlitos said:
Another post, another lie from Chris. The mask he linked was created by a gentleman named Gilbert Dawson in 2005.
Click to expand...
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
http://blog.alpineinstitute.com/2012/10/bigfoot-sightings.html

http://www.examiner.com/article/review-giants-cannibals-monsters-bigfoot-native-culture

http://www.bigfootproject.org/articles/mayak_datat.html

http://wakinguponturtleisland.blogspot.com/2006_09_01_archive.html
Click to expand...

Are you even trying to be serious? Have you looked and read your links?

I guess that mask looks at least as much like Bigfoot (a female Bigfoot your site specifies) as does the pictures you provided. I guess my kids, when they were 2-5 years old, must have seen Bigfoot too.

What do you think about the proposal that the mask you show was created in 2005? Oh wait- your link only stated that it was a mask created by a Native American- not that it was evidence of pre-Columbian knowledge of Bigfoot. In fact, this link has exclusively modern advertising and folk art images of Bigfoot. So I guess it is proof that people in the Northwest currently attract tourists by using Bigfoot images. Good to know. Have you ever seen a Paul Bunyon and Babe sign?
 
Last edited:
If porcupines ate all the giganto bones, why wouldn't they have eaten all the bones of every animal? Did giganto bones taste the best?
 
Time to quit Chris.
It was nonsensical from the start but Porcupine-gate was your silliest error.
I did laugh though.
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
...Where are the Bigfoot bones? Possibly the same place as the Giganto bones. Broken down in the bowel movements of porcupines. Chris B.
Click to expand...


You're just being silly now, Chris. Porcupines? Pffffttt... I have stated my case for the lack of bigfoot bones for quite some time and footers just can't seem to wrap their heads around the terrifying truth...


T-rex.
 
Chris,

Try going to this site.

http://www.sacred-texts.com/nam/index.htm

It is full of research on NA stories that were completed mostly prior to 1930 (pre-bigfoot craze) Please find a story that is about bigfoot and show us.

If you look around enough, you will find a comparison of characters across tribes. The only NA legend that is common to every tribe is "little people" and yet nobody seems to believe in them. Why would one tribe have a "Bigfoot" legend, but the next doesn't? Shouldn't they all know about footie? The NA legend thing is entirely bogus. Again, I challenge you to find one story that really equates to today's vision of Bigfoot.
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
I have a saliva sample that will contain good DNA I have retrieved. Since I did not witness what left the sample it's likely to be anything. I certainly won't be admitting it for testing at this time. I may later.
Click to expand...
No, you said "I myself posses DNA samples that are possibly collected from a Bigfoot..." But since you're not going to get them tested, everyone should just take your word for it they're Bigfoot because, well, you mentioned Bigfoot and you can't possibly be wrong?! Right? It could be anything, but it's really Bigfoot huh?!

ChrisBFRPKY said:
Yep, the Native Americans didn't seem to worship pieces of Bigfoot. And that means what exactly? They did draw a few pics and some also seemed to like making masks etc.
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-XIrV6iMlPT0/UHhMTRvLlqI/AAAAAAAAAzg/8KUOxy52fCI/s320/bigfoot+mask.jpg
Click to expand...
Yes of course, how could I be so thick, ambiguous drawings and suspicious ritual masks from who knows where are such perfect substitutions for actual DNA or bones or teeth or just a clear cell phone picture.

ChrisBFRPKY said:
Absurd? Only for those uneducated on the subject.
Click to expand...
Homey, there is not even one single piece of anything (physical) that can be directly and properly attributed to Bigfoot despite thousands of years of interaction (you say) with those same natives who as a culture make "artifacts" from and for just about everything except Bigfoot. That's not absurd, that's sublime.

ChrisBFRPKY said:
I think I answer this one above. See the mask. Mask = artifact, see the definition you yourself posted. Learning is fun, having fun yet?

Artifact: an object made by a human being, typically an item of cultural or historical interest.
Tada!
Click to expand...
Homes, please, if you knew how much "fun" I have reading and rebutting you I'm absolutely positive you'd beg the mods to ban me. I really shouldn't be having this much fun at your expense. I've even shared some your comedy gold with others for some serious chuckles.

ChrisBFRPKY said:
Didn't you follow the discussion we were having about Chinese farmers, North American farmers, Giganto, porcupines, dragon bones, motives for looking for them etc. You'll need to review with some context this time.
Click to expand...
Yes I know quit reminding me, YOU NEVER GET THE JOKE. I followed along perfectly. I was actually pointing out the absurdity of the "porcupine as Bigfoot culprit" stupidity. You have a terrible habit when interacting with others of pretending (once again - how not ironic) that if you happen to say it, then it can only be one thing, THE TRUTH, because so far you're never wrong. Know how I know? In all your time here, with the exception of a couple minor points, you have not once conceded even ONE single general point about the non-existence of Bigfoot. If I'm lying I'm dying. Please provide evidence you have.

ChrisBFRPKY said:
You're not having much success quoting definitions at me. Thanks though, some actually help present my argument better. Chris B.
Click to expand...
Once again, it's like you read posts completely different than everyone else. Please point out where I failed in "quoting definitions", and just as importantly, how it helps your present argument unique version of reality? I have to know.
 
Porky loves him some footie marrow.

Say, maybe ole foo keeps porcupines around as pets, knowing that his spiny friend will clean up after his demise, thus frustrating the search for bigfoot bones. Cagey, that is.

Yeah, that's the ticket.
 
I still want badgers to be involved.
Badgers wearing saddles and being rode by giant jellyfish.
Can we introduce Brussel sprouts to the game?
I hate those things. They could be the masters of the porcupines.
Oh, I assume the porcupines are wearing roller skates?
 
CHRISBFRPKWY said:
I have a saliva sample that will contain good DNA I have retrieved. Since I did not witness what left the sample it's likely to be anything. I certainly won't be admitting it for testing at this time. I may later.
Click to expand...

This is like a lotto ticket.

You have no idea what it is from, yet you took it, hoping it might be the Sasquatch spit. Now you are waiting for the DNA to break down, so that when you do send it in, it will come back inconclusive, and won't say Raccoon. If it says Raccoon you lose, if it says inconclusive you win. You throw Bigfoot into that 'inconclusive' gap, and Phi Slamma Jamma, you have a slam dunk into the Bigfoot elite.
 
Actually rare, elusive, and intelligent living creature news now . . .

10,000 photographs of Amur leopards - all 57 of them.

Shockingly, there hasn't been a single Russian wildman or Chinese yeren photo from this 900,000 acre national park.

How do we explain that? I'd say it's a case of absence of evidence actually producing evidence of absence. Chris would probably say it's a case of bigfoots being highly intelligent and avoiding the trail cameras.
 
Drewbot said:
This is like a lotto ticket.

You have no idea what it is from, yet you took it, hoping it might be the Sasquatch spit. Now you are waiting for the DNA to break down, so that when you do send it in, it will come back inconclusive, and won't say Raccoon. If it says Raccoon you lose, if it says inconclusive you win. You throw Bigfoot into that 'inconclusive' gap, and Phi Slamma Jamma, you have a slam dunk into the Bigfoot elite.
Click to expand...

Also, human contamination = bigfoot. As well all know, footie is a hybrid human, Giganto-lemur thingamabob.
 
The Shrike said:
Chris would probably say it's a case of bigfoots being highly intelligent and avoiding the trail cameras.
Click to expand...

Well, they're clearly smarter than the humans that are caught on security cams, gam cams, go-pro, etc. Because . . . bigfoot. Not only are they incredibly well-adapted to their wild habitat, they're also hip to technology. They can't make fire, but they know what a game cam is and can tiptoe around it like ballet dancer. They instantly know when a puny human enters their domain; they are agile, fast (for a biped-cheetah speed), elusive, silent when they need to be, loud when they have to be, extemely intelligent (though stymied making fire), playful, omniscient wood ninjas.

Yeah, that's the ticket.
 
I've always thought the "knowers" suffer from some sort of weird self centered bigfoot narrcissm. Everytime they step in the woods bigfoot knows they are there. Bigfoots got nothing better to do but wait till they show up.
They are the "chosen" ones Bigfoot interacts with....it's very prevalent at BFF.
 
Every game cam operating right now within the putative range of bigfoot = goose egg.

Chris from Kentucky = gets close enough to watch mommyfoot nurse her baby.
 
In fact, I'll expand on that.

Chris let's say that one day I come to you and tell you that a firebreathing dragon lives in my garage.

You, of course, ask me to show you this dragon. I, without pause or hesitation, lead you out to my garage and press the button on my keyfob that opens the garage door. The garage door opens up slowly and dramatically revealing my car, my water heater, shelves of tools and off season holiday ornaments, my recycling bin... normal garage stuff.

In notably lacks a dragon.

You ask me where's the dragon.

I tell it's right in front of you. I neglected to mention that it is an invisible dragon.

You ask me why you can't hear the dragon roar.

Well it's a mute dragon.

You ask me why you don't see any dragon footprints.

The dragon floats above the ground.

You ask me why everything in my garage isn't scorched or on fire.

The dragon breathes a special heatless flame.

You ask me why there's no dragon droppings.

The dragon is 100% metabolically efficient and doesn't leave waste.

And so on and so on and so.

So Chris does a dragon live in my garage? Because that all given me. You haven't been able to make an argument for Figboot anymore than I just did for a dragon in my garage.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom