Latest Bigfoot "evidence"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remember the Echo Incident at/near Area X? The spot was so wild and remote that a young couple drove there on their lunch break when some numbnut Bigfoot hunter started popping off slugs nearby - close enough that the shooter heard their car doors slam as they took off back down the mountain to escape the lunatic in the woods they thought was shooting at them.

Of course these NDAs are all about keeping the locations secret because they're nowhere near as wild and remote as the BLAARGers contend.
 
They also stifle group members that might have their gruntles removed, and attempt to spill the beans. I think this is rather common on "reality" TV.
 
Last edited:
Bigfoot ready for his close-up: Prospect Park Sasquatch IDed as cemetery clown prankster

http://www.brooklynpaper.com/stories/38/8/dtg-bigfoot-hoax-2015-02-20-bk_38_8.html

Whiteley said he has a longstanding a fascination with Bigfoot that has led him to dress up as the mythical creature in staged videos shot across the country, and to conduct interviews with Bigfoot “experts” and conspiracy theorists. In early videos, he said he walked too much like a human, but over time, driven by critiques from Bigfoot fans, he honed his hunched lurching.

Whiteley’s Prospect Park video was not the first time he has attempted to use the press to spread fake Bigfoot sightings, but it garnered more notice than videos past, and he said he began to worry that true believers would misconstrue his intentions.

“I’m not really interested in pissing off the Bigfoot community,” he said. “My end goal is to get a wide variety of people’s opinions. I’m interested in the reaction to mystery.”
Click to expand...
 
Hunter sees signs of Big Cat, puts up camera, gets video of elusive, rare creature.
Typical.
 
Drewbot said:
Hunter sees signs of Big Cat, puts up camera, gets video of elusive, rare creature.
Typical.
Click to expand...

Notably, the video was very clear, unambiguous, represented a significant length of time, and made the identification of the rare animal as a cougar very easy, including details such as the gender.

For the Bigfoot supporters out there: a single video of a Bigfoot with comparable clarity would eliminate all the doubts and firmly establish your belief. Go to it!
 
Here's a telling rebuttal to the denialist game cam hypothesis:
http://bigfootforums.com/index.php/...project-how-do-they-miss-the-bigfoots/page-42
The lack of game camera footage and the excuses why there is that lack of footage is perhaps the major telling blow against the existence of bigfoot. While it is easy to claim that the interested human beings never get enough time in the field or can't afford to put time in the field a game camera will do the job for free day and night 24/7.
Click to expand...
FakeCopGuy said:
Let's see, if that were so, it would apply everywhere and it would explain a lot of things:



“1,183,700 violent crimes were committed at American public schools during the 2009-2010 school year.”



The lack of game camera footage and the excuses why there is that lack of footage is perhaps the major telling blow against the existence of crime. A game camera will do the job for free day and night 24/7. Furthermore the game camera will do the job without a mind confusing the issue. Is not more rational to conclude that game camera footage of Crime does not exist because there is no Crime to capture on those cameras?



Therefore no crimes exist ... never mind the fact that less than a third were ever reported to law enforcement. There are direct similarities in the way people report things whether it be Bigfoots or crime, people are people yet, people know that is true. Despite the availability of technology things occur that are never caught on video, as illustrated above nor are they always reported. We cannot infer something doesn't exist simply because I (you) or others have never experienced a particular something yet ... If cameras were the end all answer to everything there would be no crime either
Click to expand...

Sheer genius.
 
Giordano said:
Notably, the video was very clear, unambiguous, represented a significant length of time, and made the identification of the rare animal as a cougar very easy, including details such as the gender.

For the Bigfoot supporters out there: a single video of a Bigfoot with comparable clarity would eliminate all the doubts and firmly establish your belief. Go to it!
Click to expand...

I've taken many pictures of wildlife, some even underwater. It's not that hard. Video of Bigfoot of this quality should be out there if the thing exists.
 
Giordano said:
For the Bigfoot supporters out there: a single video of a Bigfoot with comparable clarity would eliminate all the doubts and firmly establish your belief. Go to it!
Click to expand...
Yep, quit hiding behind all the kill: no kill nonsense and just get some decent friggin' photography.
 
I do enjoy when the other Einstein chimes in with his only dumb people like Justin Beiber get caught on camera doing crimes. Bigfoot is smarter than Beiber, so don't expect to see him on a cam.

That's some pretty special reasoning there.
 
dmaker said:
I do enjoy when the other Einstein chimes in with his only dumb people like Justin Beiber get caught on camera doing crimes. Bigfoot is smarter than Beiber, so don't expect to see him on a cam.

That's some pretty special reasoning there.
Click to expand...

To be fair, footie is smarter than that poster. One can imagine him shifting the bong from hand to hand, taking a hit, then the lightbulb over his head as he came up with his BFF handle: ItsAsquatch.
 
Last edited:
If there were Bigfoots (feet?) then wouldn't the security cams at ATMs have caught them when they were cashing checks? Given that calculations have shown that here is not enough food in the woods for a significant Bigfoot population to survive without leaving signs, then they must need to withdraw money so as to go to a fast-food shop.

Just kidding. But I do like the excuse that Bigfoot is too clever to be caught on game cams. Or too transparent, I guess (due to shape shifting)? Or perhaps the best and simplest explanation of all: too non-existent.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom