• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more
<snip>

Republican National Committee communications director Sean Spicer demonstrates that the GOP is the party of personal responsibility... who am I kidding, he tries to blame the media for the deplorable remarks made by Lauten.



Typical. Take some *********** responsibility for once.

Daredelvis

You don't think the media went overboard on this story? Compare and contrast to coverage of former Dem staffer, Donny Ray Williams, Jr., who pled guilty to sexual assault the day after Lauten resigned. Here's a fair analysis in the San Fran Chronicle:

That said, did Lauten’s post have to be played as such a big story? Credit journalism’s breathless rush to umbrage. As the Federalist’s Mollie Hemingway noted, the Washington Post ran three Associated Press stories as well as eight staff blogs and posts on the Lauten gaffe. A Post foreign-affairs reporter actually investigated Lauten’s articles in her student newspaper. That story kindly included a TMZ item about Lauten being arrested in 2000 on a charge of misdemeanor larceny, later dropped.

...

You could argue that Williams’ assaults, which make his behavior criminal but not national news, didn’t reflect on Landrieu. But given Lauten’s quick fall from grace, her Facebook post didn’t reflect on the GOP either.

If bad quotes alone make for good stories, then there should have been more reportage on Jonathan Gruber. He’s the MIT economist and Obamacare consultant caught on tape explaining how the Obama administration deliberately misled the public on the Affordable Care Act. The self-satisfied Gruber chalked up his success in fooling the public to “the stupidity of the American voter.” The Chronicle ran one piece on Gruber’s dust-up — mine.
 
You don't think the media went overboard on this story? Compare and contrast to coverage of former Dem staffer, Donny Ray Williams, Jr., who pled guilty to sexual assault the day after Lauten resigned. Here's a fair analysis in the San Fran Chronicle:

Boo hoo, the bad old lame stream media is picking on us for showing how hateful we are in public!

Keep it up. The Streisand Effect in action. The best way for this to go away would be for people to stop defending her stupid actions.
 
Boo hoo, the bad old lame stream media is picking on us for showing how hateful we are in public!

Keep it up. The Streisand Effect in action. The best way for this to go away would be for people to stop defending her stupid actions.

I'm neither defending Lauten's actions (her post was stupid, but her decision to resign in the face of a media uproar was a good one), nor do I wish for the story to go away. It reinforces my belief in the hopelessly biased, librul media, so it is providing me with a very pleasant sensation of cognitive coherence right now. :)
 
I'm neither defending Lauten's actions (her post was stupid, but her decision to resign in the face of a media uproar was a good one), nor do I wish for the story to go away. It reinforces my belief in the hopelessly biased, librul media, so it is providing me with a very pleasant sensation of cognitive coherence right now. :)

No, you're not defending. You're deflecting. Like when a soldier uses a shield to deflect a spear. That's not a defense, no sirree!
 
No, you're not defending. You're deflecting. Like when a soldier uses a shield to deflect a spear. That's not a defense, no sirree!

Exactly.

You want to make this story go away? MAKE it a non-story.

How do you do that? By making it non-controversial. By making it obvious everyone, including republicans, agree that what she did was unacceptable. However, as long as there are those who are defending her (see this thread), it is going to be something to talk about. And as long as it is republicans defending her, it is going to be described in partisan terms.

The solution, if you want this to be a non-story, is to slap down the morons who are defending it. Tell THEM to stop turning this into a big deal, because all they are doing is feeding the media.

Turn it into a man bites dog story and the media won't bother.
 
Well I guess that because she was such a religious person (after all she prayed for hours after her tweet) she knew John 8:7 well.

Seems she should have held onto that stone.

I liked Dan Savage's take. "If you have to ask God to figure out if you're an *******, you're an *******."

It seems God is there only after the fact, to recommend withdrawing or apologizing for stupid comments. Why didn't he just tap her on the shoulder just before she pressed "send" and give her a little tsk tsk?
 
I'm neither defending Lauten's actions (her post was stupid, but her decision to resign in the face of a media uproar was a good one), nor do I wish for the story to go away. It reinforces my belief in the hopelessly biased, librul media, so it is providing me with a very pleasant sensation of cognitive coherence right now. :)

What the heck is librul?

Is that some kind of silly code?
 
What the heck is librul?

Is that some kind of silly code?

Normally this form of code is used to quote and denigrate another speaker, not oneself.:rolleyes:

Eye dialect is used in quotes as a literary form using spelling to indicate that the character's speech overall is dialectal, foreign, or uneducated...not the writer's.;) But what do I know?
 
The children of a standing political figure are off limits (morally) except in some, very uncommon, exceptions.

1. What they do is not overly problematic. Obviously if the child of a standing political figure does something highly illegal, treasonous, or otherwise notably grave expecting that to stay out of public discourse is probably unreasonable, but the subtle actions of two teenagers during a Turkey Pardoning hardly even begins to reach that level.

2. The political figure themselves have not constantly alluded or referenced their relationship with said relative as part of their... pitch to the American public. Had Obama during his campaign made how well behaved his daughters were a part of his platform, that would, obviously depending on the exact details of how everything was worded, at least open the door to higher levels of criticism.
 
Last edited:
Normally this form of code is used to quote and denigrate another speaker, not oneself.:rolleyes:

Eye dialect is used in quotes as a literary form using spelling to indicate that the character's speech overall is dialectal, foreign, or uneducated...not the writer's.;) But what do I know?

It's called self-deprecating humor. You should try it some time. It might work well for you. ;)
 
Dress like you deserve respect.” That is sound advice that should be given to any teenager. The smart money is on the Obama daughters never having heard those words.
The smart money is that Michelle Obama has indeed had those words with her daughters. Whether or not a couple of teens made a poor or awesome fashion choice for the event that Cleon rightly ridicules is not something to begin an outrage campaign over.

This was someone taking a cheap shot at the President through his daughters.

Not classy. Snark rarely is.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom