William Parcher
Show me the monkey!
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2005
- Messages
- 27,496
What?How about the suit imperfections like the bottom of the leg coming apart during the early walk sequence...
What?How about the suit imperfections like the bottom of the leg coming apart during the early walk sequence...
That video is a mess. Poor quality, artifacting, grainy film noise, etc.
I don't see what you want me to see at all here. The video says that some believers say it's a "stuck tree branch". I've never heard that before let alone that you can see the suit fall apart there.
I'm supposed to see a major flaw here proving that it's a costume? That's one of the worst attempts at debunking I've ever seen.
No, but thanks for the offer.
I saw a crappy video.I asked you what you saw.
You wanted me to see the costume falling apart. Do you recall that?I don't recall wanting you to see anything.
If a costume were to fall apart in front of your eyes it would be a major flaw.I don't know if its a "major flaw" you're supposed to be seeing either.
I know that. Yesterday it had less than 100 views. Proof of the hoax lay dormant is a little corner of the Internet.The video is old, and was not made by myself.
No he didn't. There are no arrows or red circles or anything pointing anything out. I wouldn't have known which heel to look at if I hadn't been told that in the script. Is Ghetto Sven still in the ghetto?The person that made it pointed out something obviously.
That's fine.I see a suit coming apart at the heel.
The sole and heel of the foot look unnaturally weird and do weird things. This can be even more exaggerated with the various digital treatments that have been applied.IIRC, we have discussed that point in the PGF before, and I believe one of the conclusions was that it looks like the costume foot slips backwards, making the heel stick out.
Well show them if you want me or others to see what you are talking about.The large res scans I have of those frames show the same "anomaly".
I don't want anyone to see anything.
Me either. My guess is Patty probably died from the infection she got from it.I see it, and I've never noticed it before. Thanks for the link.
It's interesting but I can't tell if I'm looking at some kind of film artifact or something on the subject itself.
Nope. She did get an infection but chewed the leg off. The weird thing is she was able to make a prosthesis with a tree branch, pigskin bindings and a stomper someone left in the woods. Unfortunately the stomper was a left foot.Me either. My guess is Patty probably died from the infection she got from it.
Here is another suit defect that Munns avoided..
[qimg]http://i1130.photobucket.com/albums/m532/abitofmystuff/Lumps1_zps8e2da105.jpg[/qimg]
Check out the lumps on Patty's left leg..
Paterson's BF anatomy at it's best, or chunks of padding out of position?
This is early in the film and the back of the left leg is never really clear again, at least not in the LMS version..
When Munns was asked about it, he wrote it off to lighting and shadows, or a film anomaly. Never mind that the defect is in direct sunlight, and that the other back " muscles " that proponents are so quick to point out as being ' realistic ', have pretty much the same appearance as the ' anomalies ' on the back of the left leg..