Thoughts about Munns' Book When Roger Met Patty

^^ I agree as well I think. You can see a similar thing with the left leg closer to the knee joint. It looks like there is suddenly a branch sticking straight out of the knee that looks suspiciously like the heel flap. I could be wrong, and sorry but I don't have the time ( or more importantly the inclination) to create a screenshot. But if you watch the left leg at round knee level you should see it too.
 
I'm sure River will prove we are wrong, and provide a link like he did with the plaster cast proof of a hoax he did.
 
Drewbot said:
I'm sure River will prove we are wrong, and provide a link like he did with the plaster cast proof of a hoax he did.
Click to expand...

Are you talking about this Drew? I find it hilarious that PGF experts love to ignore this. Usually it goes something like: "well we don't know where this footage was made" or " it was a practice casting" as suggested by Munns. Even when Gimlin states he was the one shooting the footage and it was that same day (October 20th he claims) at Bluff Creek. That was part of their original claim, and important to the footprint evidence Meldrum seems to have written a paper on, and named the species with the footprints. Not important though, on a forum piss contest. :cool:
 
River said:
Show your cards WP. I'm sitting here looking at copy8 and John Greens copy of the walk sequence. It's not brush or debris.
Click to expand...
Before I proceed, would you like to see the costume falling apart and showing a flap at the left heel, as well? I assume you would like people to see costume flaws at both heels. That would make your argument even stronger.
 
William Parcher said:
Before I proceed, would you like to see the costume falling apart and showing a flap at the left heel, as well? I assume you would like people to see costume flaws at both heels. That would make your argument even stronger.
Click to expand...


You're funny WP. Show your cards or don't. Trying to put words in my mouth doesnt work.
 
The first card I will show is the left heel flap. So do you want it, or fold your hand now?
 
I would vote for film anomaly. I also noticed that Patty gives a huge thumbs up with her right hand just before the flap appears.

I think if it was slowed down a bit more it would become clear that the flap is just a fleck on the film.
 
Here is my first card. It shows that the costume is falling apart at the left heel. The "flap" or piece of costume hanging off the back of the heel can be seen clearly.


q9eE_zpsdc201671.gif



River shows the costume falling apart flap hanging off the back of the right heel...

yU0md4l.jpg
 
River, do you now need to see more of my poker hand, or was the first card enough?

All your chip are belong to us.
 
I'm confused, WP. I don't see what you're calling a flap on the left heel but I do see what River's calling a flap on the right. The irregular shape seen on the left leg looks very much to me like foreground material obscuring the leg below the ankle.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom