How do you figure it didn't contradict the officer's account?
There's to be a news conference in the morning. Let's hear what is said then.
Right now we see a report, "four shots to the arm", "two shots to the head", and, the examiner didn't yet have access to the clothing.
At least three of those shots in the arm are to the inside aspect. You don't run with your arms in that position, but it is consistent with arms raised over one's head.
One way or the other, it appears the autopsy will have the information we need.
Blood on the inside of the arm, is there related blood or not on the tee shirt?
I'm willing to wait, and I think, given the location of the entry wounds, the autopsy details will resolve the position of his arms when the shots hit him.
If his arms were down, Wilson made a stupid decision, but maybe not a criminal one. If Brown's arms were up, Wilson's mistake was at least criminal negligence, even if the killing wasn't intentional.
And, BTW, I don't think the killing was intentional. I think it was likely cop in a rage, out of control.
That's an anatomical drawing showing the location of the wounds. The position of one's arms, running toward the cop or holding one's arms up surrendering, is not the position of the anatomical drawing. I suggest people think about that.