acbytesla
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2012
- Messages
- 39,490
I don't know if Rudy was broke when he went to Milan, but I know he was essentially broke when he was arrested. That all he had on him was change.He went to Milan. It could have been to see people and go out dancing but you all keep claiming he was broke and needed money for rent. Recently there was speculation that he went to the lawyers to please his parents presumably to keep them supporting him.
I disagree. There he is in a nursery that was broken into just a few short weeks earlier and had 2000 Euros stolen. And I see no reason that Rudy wouldn't hang out there. If it had money to be stolen, my guess is he wouldn't have hung out there. Since it didn't, it was shelter and there was no reason to believe that anyone would be there the next day as the place was closed.There is absolutely no basis to assume he stole money from the nursery. Perhaps had he robbed them before and assumed the locks hadn't been changed he would gone there to see if more money had accumulated but there is no way he would have hung out there. There is as much on him being a hired assassin as that he stole the money from the nursery.
No in fact there is nothing that points to him as a fence and logic simply doesn't support that theory at all.There is much more information pegging him as a fence.
First of all, had he done every job you have fantasized that he did, it wouldn't even begin to rise to the level of "crime wave". We don't even know if a Senora Diaz exists, if she exists if she was robbed and if she was robbed that she fingered Rudi and if she fingered him that he did it. I don't see how someone that calls himself at all skeptical could not see the holes in this idea that Rudi stole a watch and caused a fire.
You have never denied that you would not believe CT if it hurt the kids. He just isn't credible, any more than Quintavalle, Nara and Curatolo. Just imagine he had come forward with a story after seeing the kids' pictures that went against them. He didn't bother to call the cops and tell them who had invaded his flat.
You're simply wrong about that. I'm not crazy about the CT story. But I can't ignore it. I also believe the story about his neighbor. The only thing I'm not sure of is if the gold watch was the same gold watch.
That's not what I said. I don't see computers as the type of things sold to a fence, That a thief would try and sell them himself as a fence is not likely to offer enough money to the thief to make it worth the thief's time and risk. The problem from what I see is that when you add a fence into the scenario, you are are adding too much costs into the product as the fence has to make his margin.You've said that the computers had little value so crooks would have to steal a lot of them so crime must have been rampant.
