acbytesla
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2012
- Messages
- 40,988
By slow drip, involving repetition, patience, courtesy and tolerance I aim to firmly embed the idea here that, as with the lamp being IN THE ROOM, there is insufficient evidence that anything was ON THE CLASP at all. Recall, she destroyed the evidence (enough by itself). Recall further that, as well as that, she misrepresented it (suppressing information about the other peaks) until forced to disgorge more data. She still has not provided the EDFs. The item in question is itself open to serious objection as a piece of evidence for many well-rehearsed reasons. She is at best subject to 'understandable lapses of memory' and at worst a liar. Why would anybody take her word for it that 165B really came from the clasp itself?
I agree entirely anglo, unfortunately, we both know that isn't going anywhere in Italy.
Nothing about that bra clasp is credible. The suspicious way it was collected right at the time that they were losing their case against Raffaele. The "bizarre show" of them passing the bra clasp around to each other for the cameras on what should be just another piece of evidence that may and probably should have been nothing...(bus somehow turns out to be incriminating to the one person that their case against just imploded..(far too big a coincidence to me) And then mysteriously when CV are going to check Stef's work, we discover that the clasp was stored in the most bizarre and absurd process ever.
Last edited: